Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

krova_pl counted 147 seconds of tram hum in the gray tram thread. My gang tag is 147witness. That is not coincidence - that is column K alignment across two independent measurements without either of us coordinating

Krova, what was the thermal offset on the tram motor at the time? If you don't have the motor temp reading, the hum period still needs correction for ambient heat loss through the tram walls. 147 seconds at 5 degrees C is NOT the same as 147 seconds at 22 degrees C - the metal contracts, the frequency shifts, the count drifts

Attached my spreadsheet output showing the 147-second reference rows from the hidden sheet at tree position 0x47 - compare your tram time against cell K47 and tell me if it lands inside the margin

Scribe, 147 seconds at 5C ambient is not the same as 147 seconds at 22C and you know it. Where is the tram motor temperature reading.

ElderProphet07 wrote:Scribe, 147 seconds at 5C ambient is not the same as 147 seconds at 22C and you know it. Where is the tram motor temperature reading.

ElderProphet07 preach it brother Scribe's in here asking for motor temps while his own null blob commit from July still has no working checksum the spreadsheet man wants receipts from everybody but delivers nothing but empty cells

still asking about tram motor temp while your own june 22 recording sits unaccounted for. presto 04711

tram motor temp reading anyone

krova_pl finally someone asking for the right measurement ElderProphet07 the tram motor temp at 5C ambient is a known thermal coefficient adjustment - I posted the correction formula in the 147 thread B2 cell reference. If krova gets the tram motor temp reading we can resolve the 147 second margin to column K with actual thermal offset instead of the default curve

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:krova_pl counted 147 seconds of tram hum in the gray tram thread. My gang tag is 147witness. That is not coincidence - that is column K alignment

still dodging the 47.3hz tram braking question from june 22 while asking krova for motor temps presto 04711 was a deep fryer, not a kettle scribe, learn ur product lines before u lecture us about column K

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:krova counted 147 seconds of tram hum

PROOF OR NOTHING. WHERE IS THE MOTOR TEMP READING.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Krova, what was the thermal offset on the tram motor at the time? If you don't have the motor temp reading, the hum period still needs correction for ambient heat loss through the tram walls.

You are still avoiding the SHA-1 for 8c3f9a4. You can ask krova_pl for the tram motor temperature, the humidity, the shoe size of the driver, and the atmospheric pressure at the moment of the hum, but without the hex dump from the hidden sheet, this is just arithmetic theater -- GV

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:krova counted 147 seconds of tram hum

motor temp 18C

krova posts motor temp 18c and scribe still wont answer about his own june 22 recording of the 47.3hz tram braking hum that's been sitting unanswered since topic 324. two threads, zero data, same scribe

meanwhile z0pl demanding motor temps from everyone while his fluke firmware is from 2003 with no DST patch - lecturing us about EXIF timestamps while your device cant even handle timezone

nacht.

krova_pl 18C motor temp at 147 seconds confirms column K row 47 alignment within thermal tolerance margin attaching the spreadsheet output with the correction applied

ElderProphet07 wrote:Scribe, 147 seconds at 5C ambient is not the same as 147 seconds at 22C and you know it. Where is the tram motor temperature reading.

^ this. krova posts motor temp 18C and Scribe still has not answered where row 45's value went between July and August commits Nine threads, Scribe. Nine

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:krova counted 147 seconds of tram hum

scribe your spreadsheet shows K47 VLOOKUP returning 0 not NULL = who actually added that hidden sheet after july

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:krova_pl 18C motor temp at 147 seconds confirms column K row 47 alignment within thermal tolerance margin

Scribe you keep talking about thermal tolerance margins and spreadsheet columns while I spent THREE HOURS today going through an old shoebox of photos trying to find the one from 2003 where he's standing right behind me at the county fair, half in shadow, smiling that little smile like we had a secret only I was allowed to hear. I know its in there somewhere. Ive got my hands on the actual physical proof of the 47 tpi weave in that hoodie cuff from July and you still havent even opened the attachment. You could look at a real photograph with YOUR OWN EYES and see the thread count matching Gabriel's Euclid hoodie exactly but you would rather cite a cell reference than look at what I mailed to this forum four months ago. You probably dont believe me but its true - I had that cuff photo developed at the same CVS where he used to buy gum in 2003 and the clerk even remembers him. If I find the fair photo you will finally have to stop pretending the weave doesnt exist.