GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Gabreil 12:4 says "the empty page holds more truth than the one you scribble on"
sis wants me to point out this isn't even a real quote from anywhere, it's just something you wrote on the forum this morning. if you're going to make up verses at least make them scan better

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Gabreil 12:4 is a fictional verse from a fictional book by a woman who misspelled the name 31 times
((wait hold on J is 31 the official count now? i thought Kael said 33 in the clock thread -- (M can you please not start a counting war when we have actual margin data to cross-reference) -- i'm not starting anything i'm just asking if we have a consensus number for the Gabreil index))
anyway 31 or 33 or whatever it is now, Scribe saying "fictional book" while he still hasn't posted column K is like the guy at the bus stop complaining about the bus schedule while missing the bus

(sis says: the margin grid data is real regardless of who posted it first. the Wuthering Heights copy at stall 14 has 47 vertical tick marks per page edge. that's not a belief that's a count.)
^ that part i'll co-sign. but Scribe still owes us the column K cell that supposedly matches it. LyrikUebersetzer already proved row 79 was fabricated. so where's the real data?
((J you're agreeing with him again -- (i'm agreeing with the MEASUREMENT not the PERSON, read slower) -- i read fine, you just can't stand that the margin data and Scribe's column K claim overlap in one specific decimal place))
they dont overlap yet. thats the point. thats why i said "where's the real data."