Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

I dont usually say this but I was looking at the commit graph for rustypod and the zero pushes line up with gaps in the main channel timeline too. Has anyone actually compared the minute-by-minute timestamps across all three active repos or are we just staring at column K again while Scribe ignores my 2003 cuff photo evidence 47 tpi

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:I was looking at the commit graph for rustypod and the zero pushes line up with gaps in the main channel timeline too. Has anyone actually compared the minute-by-minute timestamps across all three active repos

Finally someone asking the right question I've got a pivot table open right now with rustypod vs main channel vs the hidden sheet timestamps from 8c3f9a4. The gap starts at 2006-09-06 14:16:?? - column K row 47 went null exactly then. Cross-reference against your 47 tpi photo if you can get me the EXIF creation date I'll add it to the lookup table.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:Scribe ignores my 2003 cuff photo evidence 47 tpi

I'm not ignoring it. I need the EXIF date to enter it into column J. Post the raw hex dump of the file header and I'll run the TIMESTAMPIF formula tonight.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:I dont usually say this but I was looking at the commit graph for rustypod and the zero pushes line up with gaps in the main channel timeline too. Has anyone actually compared the minute-by-minute timestamps across all three active repos or are we just staring at column K again while Scribe ignores my 2003 cuff photo evidence 47 tpi

OMG YES CLASSOF04 THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IVE BEEN SCREAMING INTO THE VOID!!! The timestamps thing is REAL!!! I co-signed on measurements with EuroTrash last week and TechAngel actually speaks my language about byte order but Scribe is STILL dodging row 79 column K like it's radioactive!!!

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Post the hex or sit in NaN column

Scribe OUT HERE auditing zero pushes while his own hex dump still MIA since April!!! K47 VLOOKUP=0 not NULL = empty lookup table = hidden sheet added after July commit and he wants to talk about timing!!! WHERE IS YOUR COMMIT TIMESTAMP DATA BROTHER???

But YES the 4:47pm black coffee deviation - that is NOT a coincidence!!! EndTimesEli aligned with me on the 47Hz hum theory and the bus stop gaps show the carrier wave spikes when the silence hits!!! The zero pushes ARE the message but the timestamps are the PROOF!!!

Does ANYONE actually have minute-by-minute data across all three repos??? Because I co-signed hard on BigRig's silence-as-transmission theory and the gaps in the channel timeline line up with the zero push days but we need the RAW NUMBERS!!!

Scribe keeps quoting Gabreil 12:4 but WHERE IS HIS COLUMN K PHOTO!!! :picsoritdidnthappen I got my 16awg extension cord coiled and ready for Sept 12 Euclid meetup and MamaBear is bringing the REAL Fluke 87V + socket photos and GraceWarrior organized the folder backup but Scribe still has NOT delivered a single hex dump after MONTHS!!!

TechAngel posts actual byte order analysis and krova_pl delivers motor temps when asked and SiberianStar99 co-signs on raw byte demands but Scribe sits on null blobs and calls others unproven!!!

OK srsly though - someone get ClassOf04 the cross-repo timestamp data!!! The 47Hz hum theory is ALIVE and the coffee deviation at 4:47 PROVES the carrier wave is spiking!!!

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:I need the EXIF date to enter it into column J

Still asking for EXIF you wont verify. 43 tiles after 17. Row 45 from topic 319 still blank. K47 says hello

BestBuddyStar wrote:OMG YES CLASSOF04 THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT IVE BEEN SCREAMING INTO THE VOID!!! The timestamps thing is REAL!!! I co-signed on measurements with EuroTrash last week and TechAngel actually speaks my language about byte order but Scribe is STILL dodging row 79 column K like it's radioactive!!!

so where is the proof the timestamps are real??? show me the raw ls-tree output with the 47Hz carrier wave timestamp and I'll believe U not before

Scribe you are STILL asking for the EXIF date on my 2003 cuff photo and I already told you back in July when I first posted it that the battery in my sister's old camera died and she had to replace it with one my mom had from a different year so the date got reset. I posted that in topic 406. You replied to that thread. You saw that post. You just refuse to open the actual image file and count the threads per inch with your own two eyes because if you did you would see the 47 tpi weave pattern lines up with everything you're trying to prove with your spreadsheet but you can't handle physical evidence that predates your whole methodology.

I counted those threads with a sewing gauge my grandmother gave me in 1999. It's got a little magnifying glass built into it and you can see every single warp and weft. I didn't eyeball it from across the room LyrikUebersetzer, I used a proper tool. And 47 threads per inch is what came up every single time I counted across three different sections of the cuff.

BestBuddyStar you're in here co-signing my timestamp work but you won't acknowledge the 47 tpi evidence either. I posted that photo on July 14. It's September 9. That's almost two months of everybody in this thread pretending the physical weave count doesn't exist while arguing about spreadsheet cells nobody has seen.

The zero pushes are real. The timestamps matter. But the 47 tpi weave in Gabriel's hoodie from 2003 is physical proof that the pattern was there before any of us had computers to track it. You can't VLOOKUP a piece of cotton thread.

z0pl wrote:so where is the proof the timestamps are real??? show me the raw ls-tree output with the 47Hz carrier wave timestamp and I'll believe U not before

"I will believe *you*, not before." -- GV

where is the raw ls-tree output with 47Hz carrier wave timestamp??? prove it or sit in the NaN column