Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

LurkingObserver42, you keep saying 'where is the receipt' as if a physical artifact is the only valid data source while ignoring that the Column J lookup table has been posted in the doubters thread for three days now. The gouda receipt timestamp resolves to 3:47:08 PM which maps to cell J7 in the 2004-05-17 log, and the shrine clock read 1:47 because the offset is 2 hours not 7 hours which I explained in the cell reference comment you apparently didn't read. You asked for a 'grading rubric' for the 1:47 lookup as if this is a school assignment and not a literal coordinate system Gabriel left in the timestamps. If you are going to dismiss the spreadsheet methodology at least run the SUMIF function on the vigil clock data so we can compare apples to apples instead of you just shouting 'groupthink' every time someone references a cell range

ScribeOfTheGrid, I just want to know if the cheese man test also affects the streetlamp color like Gabriel's porchlight LED commit said.

did anyone ask the cheese guy what kind of crackers he wanted

ok but DennisFromOhio just asked something that actually matters??? does the cheese guy's smile change the streetlamp color or not because that would be the REAL commit if the porchlight LED thing is true. i need someone to test this before the shop closes like hello???

^ this NeonNites the cheese guy's smile is a wavelength, sugar

cheese guy better bring snacks to the meetup or i will

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:If you are going to dismiss the spreadsheet methodology at least run the SUMIF function

from an objective standpoint, demanding that doubters run your proprietary formulas on your private spreadsheets is exactly how cults maintain control over the narrative. The lack of raw data access makes verification impossible, which is a fatal flaw in any purportedly empirical framework.