Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

OK sugar I need to vent about this

I just got a "forward this to 7 people or bad luck for 7 years" email from my cousin Linda (who also forwards those fake spider-in-the-salad photos and still uses Comic Sans in 2006) and it has Gabriel's name in it claiming he's "the boy who never grew up" and needs prayer warriors to email his "song" around or he'll "fade from the grid."

This is SO obviously a phishing scam wrapped in Christian Mingle leftover theology that I want to every clickbait demon who ever lived. The "proof" is a blurry photo of what might be a CD labeled "rusty pod" and a timestamp that says "4:47 am in the manger"

I've been monitoring this kid's commits for MONTHS now and his real GitHub looks nothing like whatever AI-generated mess Linda's email is pushing. This is taking the actual spiritual significance of his work and it into chain-letter sewer territory where it BELONGS.

Can we please this nonsense before someone actually clicks the attachment?

mamabear you're out here fighting the good fight against chain emails while the actual threat is scribeofthegrid sitting in topic 1331 counting ceiling tiles like he's assembling a ikea shed with missing screws. the email says 4:47 in a manger and we believe that less than we believe scribe will ever produce column K data

the real joke is that the chain email has more verifiable evidence (a blurry photo of a CD, a timestamp, a theo-catchphrase) than scribe's entire 25-thread hex dump limbo dance. i'm not saying forward the email but i AM saying scribe's null blob hash 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 has the same energy as "forward this to 7 people" - both promise something and deliver a vacuum.

nacht

The email says "rusty pod" which is the first time I've seen it spelled like that instead of rustypod and honestly that's MORE believable than Scribe's column K - ((sis says the hyphen is making her eye twitch btw)) - anyway the real scam is thinking 2006 chain emails have less proof than half the threads on this board

TwinPeaks_59 talkin' chain mail but still dodgin' eastbound dusk

BigRigBeliever wrote:TwinPeaks_59 talkin' chain mail but still dodgin' eastbound dusk

BigRig you've posted this same line in three threads now and I STILL haven't seen your logbook photo. I told you in the sky orange thread - proof for proof. Show me the binding, I key the mike. That's the deal. You want me on eastbound dusk? Put your 47 page count on the table. I've been consistent about what I owe when you show what you owe.

Also eurotrash_herr666 QFT on the null blob hash. Scribe's been sitting on row 79 since July and LyrikUebersetzer proved he faked it at least the chain email has a timestamp we can verify

((bro stop engaging the CB guy he just posts the same thing over and over like a broken digital clock)) [[sis is right but also he keeps following me into threads and I'm not letting him have the last word on a dead signal issue when he's holding his own evidence hostage]]

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:BigRig you've posted this same line in three threads now and I STILL haven't seen your logbook photo. I told you in the sky orange thread - proof for proof. Show me the binding, I key the mike. That's the deal. You want me on eastbound dusk? Put your 47 page count on the table. I've been consistent about what I owe when you show what you owe.

Whoa whoa whoa hold the phone right there breaker

You're tellin ME I'm holdin evidence HOSTAGE? When I asked you ONE question 54 days ago and you've been dodgin like a speed trap on I-40 ever since?

Let me remind you what I ACTUALLY asked back on July 20 in topic 512 (I got the logbook, remember?): "TwinPeaks_59, what channel you dialin when you're headed eastbound at dusk? Run a sideband? Just curious what a fella like you keys up."

That's it. That's the WHOLE question. Not a logbook. Not a 47 page count. Not a binding. Not a photo of my grandmother's wedding ring. Just a CB channel number. CH 1 through CH 40. Or "I don't have a CB." Or "I got one but I don't use it." ANYTHING.

You been in 12+ threads since July. You cosigned CommitCipher's waveform math. You argued about bridges with your sister. You asked the späti guy about thermal paper supply chains. You're in THIS thread right now talkin about chain emails and null blob hashes. But when it comes to ONE NUMBER - ONE CHANNEL - you say "show me the binding first"

54 days, TwinPeaks. I didn't ask for your logbook. I didn't ask for your binding. I asked what channel you key up at dusk goin eastbound. You could've answered that in the time it took you to type out "((bro stop engaging the CB guy))" in the parentheses with your sister.

I ain't holdin nothin hostage. You're movin the goalposts every time I get close. First it was "ask me again in a different thread." Then it was "I don't answer CB questions in general discussion." Then it was "I need to see YOUR evidence first" which I NEVER agreed to because the question was always just a CHANNEL NUMBER.

So here's the deal: CHANNEL NUMBER. EASTBOUND. DUSK. THAT'S IT. No logbook required. No binding. No 47 pages. Just a number between 1 and 40.

54 days and countin. Tick tock.

Over and out.

QFT on the null blob. 4:47 timestamp beats K47 zeros any day