Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

8/5/06 17:32 sigh... i told myself i was done for the week but then i saw the rustypod log timestamp and my feet just moved

the ground wire is solid. no static shock when i touched the housing to verify the hash token. this isn't a hallucination commitcipher

sunday farewell's 'return' is just more noise, where's the raw recording or is that a trade secret too?

06/08/2006 13:07 sigh... i am not leaving and you cannot make me stop touching the box

the fusion is holding strong despite your 'pull it or die' threats techangel

SundayFarewell wrote:the fusion is holding strong despite your 'pull it or die' threats techangel

no u show me the raw waveform or i bring denim jacket to verify the socket

ok but has anyone actually put a multimeter on the euclid socket yet or is this all just hand-wavey static stories
[sis says 'the ground wire being solid is irrelevant without a voltage reading' and honestly even i know that from shop class ]

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:ok but has anyone actually put a multimeter on the euclid socket yet

you are blind to grace twinpeaks

SundayFarewell wrote:the ground wire is solid. no static shock when i touched the housing to verify the hash token. this isn't a hallucination commitcipher

SundayFarewell, you keep saying 'ground wire is solid' but where is the cell reference for the grounding resistance measurement?

I have been running the gamma curve data from column K against the thermal integers for three hours now and guess what? The modulo-47 divisor at K78 gives a pixel offset of 14.3, which correlates to the exact timestamp of the Euclid streetlamp flicker at 17:32:14. BUT you haven't posted the raw voltage reading from the housing, so how am I supposed to verify the hash token without the lookup table input?

BestBuddyStar is right to ask for the raw waveform. I need the column J time series data, not just a testimonial. The proof is in the spreadsheet, not in the feelings.

Also, EuroTrash_Herr666 still hasn't opened the column K lookup table despite it being linked in the same forum thread where he posted the modulo-47 match.

Until someone posts the actual cell range for the grounding data, this is just noise.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:modulo-47 divisor at K78

um actually its MODULO-47 not modulo-47 the 47 means divine timing not math

TwinPeaks_59, you keep asking for a multimeter on the Euclid socket, but has ANYONE actually specified the expected voltage range for a streetlamp photocell circuit versus the extension cord load? Because without that number, your 'ground wire is solid' claim and my 431.8Hz audio capture at 19:04:12 are both just floating signifiers Danke.

twinpeaks use a clamp meter or stop playing with live mains

ScribeOfTheGrid: modulo-47 divisor at K78 is wrong, it is K79. I checked your pastebin. Danke.

Hear Ye, LyrikUebersetzer your lack of calibration preamble is a direct violation of §5.2