Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

8/5/06 17:32 sigh... i told myself i was done for the week but then i saw the rustypod log timestamp and my feet just moved

the ground wire is solid. no static shock when i touched the housing to verify the hash token. this isn't a hallucination commitcipher

sunday farewell's 'return' is just more noise, where's the raw recording or is that a trade secret too?

06/08/2006 13:07 sigh... i am not leaving and you cannot make me stop touching the box

the fusion is holding strong despite your 'pull it or die' threats techangel

SundayFarewell wrote:the fusion is holding strong despite your 'pull it or die' threats techangel

no u show me the raw waveform or i bring denim jacket to verify the socket

ok but has anyone actually put a multimeter on the euclid socket yet or is this all just hand-wavey static stories
[sis says 'the ground wire being solid is irrelevant without a voltage reading' and honestly even i know that from shop class ]

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:ok but has anyone actually put a multimeter on the euclid socket yet

you are blind to grace twinpeaks

SundayFarewell wrote:the ground wire is solid. no static shock when i touched the housing to verify the hash token. this isn't a hallucination commitcipher

SundayFarewell, you keep saying 'ground wire is solid' but where is the cell reference for the grounding resistance measurement?

I have been running the gamma curve data from column K against the thermal integers for three hours now and guess what? The modulo-47 divisor at K78 gives a pixel offset of 14.3, which correlates to the exact timestamp of the Euclid streetlamp flicker at 17:32:14. BUT you haven't posted the raw voltage reading from the housing, so how am I supposed to verify the hash token without the lookup table input?

BestBuddyStar is right to ask for the raw waveform. I need the column J time series data, not just a testimonial. The proof is in the spreadsheet, not in the feelings.

Also, EuroTrash_Herr666 still hasn't opened the column K lookup table despite it being linked in the same forum thread where he posted the modulo-47 match.

Until someone posts the actual cell range for the grounding data, this is just noise.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:modulo-47 divisor at K78

um actually its MODULO-47 not modulo-47 the 47 means divine timing not math

TwinPeaks_59, you keep asking for a multimeter on the Euclid socket, but has ANYONE actually specified the expected voltage range for a streetlamp photocell circuit versus the extension cord load? Because without that number, your 'ground wire is solid' claim and my 431.8Hz audio capture at 19:04:12 are both just floating signifiers Danke.

twinpeaks use a clamp meter or stop playing with live mains

ScribeOfTheGrid: modulo-47 divisor at K78 is wrong, it is K79. I checked your pastebin. Danke.

Hear Ye, LyrikUebersetzer your lack of calibration preamble is a direct violation of §5.2

SundayFarewell wrote:you are blind to grace twinpeaks

what is the actual amperage draw on that circuit?

BestBuddyStar wrote:um actually its MODULO-47 not modulo-47

^ this. i was gonna say the same thing, BestBuddyStar. these spreadsheet folks keep missin the forest for the trees if you ask me

Regards,
Dennes

it's the 79th verse not the 78th, walk in the light