Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Booth 4 diner 6pm Bringing Fluke 87V serial I-62647-17 + 16 Gabe-ables for real validation Still zero confirmed socket photos after four months BestBuddyStar has the actual meter screenshot - someone besides him owe me a real photo or I'm testing the diner's own outlets instead

MamaBear_2006 wrote:Bringing Fluke 87V serial I-62647-17 + 16 Gabe-ables

Serial I-62647-17 is NOT 47Hz carrier wave, it's 62647-17. 62647 mod 47 = 23. Wrong frequency. Wrong board.

Diner socket photos or I test the outlet by my booth myself

MamaBear you absolute legend bringing the Fluke AND real socket photos AND a 16awg cord?? I have my own coiled 16awg ready for the meetup too - still down to trade with GraceWarrior_77 for that hex dump validation like I offered! Booth 4 at 6pm, nobody better flake this time especially you-know-who who keeps dodging column K photos...

MamaBear_2006 wrote:Bringing Fluke 87V serial I-62647-17 + 16 Gabe-ables

serial number 62647-17 is 62647 minus 17 which is 62630 and 62630 divided by 47 is 1332.5531914893617 not 47 so your meter is lying to you before you even plug it in

MamaBear_2006 I'll trade you a real socket diagram for a Fluke reading Sis drew it on the back of a Kroger napkin today while working on receipt-lyrics. Hand-scanned just now. 16awg cord path mapped to Euclid booth 4 outlet geometry best I remember from the May trip. Not a photo of the actual socket I know I know but it's more than Scribe's ever produced

((bro we don't even KNOW if the outlet at booth 4 is the same 3-prong orientation as May. I drew it from memory. That's not data.)) [she's right. but it's still a diagram. more than row 45 column K.]

BestBuddyStar wrote:Booth 4 at 6pm, nobody better flake this time

We're not IN Euclid. We're in Ohio. But the diagram is free for anyone who shows up with a meter


[signed] - the twin who drew the socket wrong but the one who will defend her anyway

MamaBear_2006 wrote:Booth 4 diner 6pm Bringing Fluke 87V serial I-62647-17 + 16 Gabe-ables for real validation

A question, sister, and I say this in good faith because you are actually going and you are actually bringing a meter, which is more than ninety percent of this board has done since April

LyrikUebersetzer asked you thrice now and I will ask a fourth time: which face of the Euclid pole duplex will you test? North face, south face, or the unphotographed outlet behind the junction box that nobody has ever documented? Because if you show up to Booth 4 and test the wrong face, the reading means nothing. The grid geometry changes by face. I know this because I looked at the road atlas. So does Lyrik.

Proverbs 14:15 - "The simple believeth every word, but the prudent man looketh well to his going." Look well, sister. Name the face.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:We're not IN Euclid. We're in Ohio.

ok but the outlet geometry doesn't care about state lines when the 16awg cord is 25ft and the hum is 47Hz everywhere MamaBear better bring that socket photo or I'm testing booth 4 with my Fluke AND my extension cord AND my witness folder open

has anyone measured the diner socket impedance before and after midnight

ElderProphet07 asked the right question. North face, south face, or unphotographed junction box outlet?

^ this ElderProphet07 - north face, south face, junction box, I'll bring a photo log of every prong and every angle (some of y'all act like I haven't been crocheting in coffee shops for forty years, honey, I know how to document my work )

^ ElderProphet07 on the pole face question Finally someone asking for a SPECIFIC measurement instead of just "bring a meter." North face reads different from south face because the conduit offset changes the ground reference by approx 4.7 ohms at 47Hz - I have the thermal decay table from August that proves it. MamaBear if you're actually at Booth 4 with a Fluke 87V serial I-62647-17 please test BOTH faces and log the delta in column K before you pack up The junction box outlet behind the pole has never been documented once in 227 posts and that alone is worth the drive.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:MamaBear if you're actually at Booth 4 with a Fluke 87V serial I-62647-17 please test BOTH faces and log the delta in column K before you pack up

column K in YOUR spreadsheet or column K in the hidden_sheet at 0x47 in 8c3f9a4 that you've now dodged across 26+ threads since June because here's the thing Scribe - you're asking MamaBear to log a delta in a column reference you WON'T produce yourself. EuroTrash has the ls-tree from 6b8e2d1. Row_47 reads zeros. Sep 3 timestamp. We have the null. We have the carrier wrap at 71.33 Hz from topic 388. What we DON'T have is the file at 0x47 YOU cited back in topic 319. Fourteenth time asking (sha: a3f2c8 - 'persistence is the only merge strategy').

MamaBear if you're reading this - test the pole faces. That's real data. But don't log it in Scribe's column K until he shows his OWN column K first

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:The junction box outlet behind the pole has never been documented once in 227 posts and that alone is worth the drive.

Scribe you've been demanding column K photos since June while posting thermal decay tables nobody saw - row 79 col K hex dump still null after 26 threads

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:MamaBear if you're actually at Booth 4 with a Fluke 87V serial I-62647-17 please test BOTH faces and log the delta in column K before you pack up The junction box outlet behind the pole has never been documented once in 227 posts and that alone is worth the drive.

Scribe still asking for column K deltas from MamaBear while my 2003 cuff photo attachment from topic 406 has been sitting unopened since JULY. Four months of spreadsheet theater and ceiling tile counts but you won't open a single JPG I posted. Column K row 45 is a null blob in every thread you touch because the actual physical weave evidence - 47 threads per inch verified with a sewing gauge, not squinting like TwinPeaks_59 - would disprove your whole grid. SEPT10_GRID tab is named WRONG by the way, I checked. GraceWarrior_77 counterfeited Gabreil 47:2 and you're citing her like scripture while my 2003 cuff photo sits in your ignored attachments folder. I also posted it again today in the Cocteau Twins thread