Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

QFT on the RAW file demand

z0pl already showing up with golden ratio math like that proves anything. MODS BAN THIS NEW AGE SPAMMER

FlameFury24, did you even look at the cuff before you called it a shadow?

^ this o/ the tilt, the moment, the calling

nice blurry 'photo' of a grey hoodie that's objectively just a trash bag caught on a fence

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:FlameFury24, did you even look at the cuff before you called it a shadow?

Bitte, ClassOf04_Truther, I have looked at the cuff. I have looked at the cuff in 1200 DPI. I have looked at the cuff through a spectral decomposition of the blue channel. The weave count is 2-1-2. The 2003 tour shirt documented in the Euclid B-side liner notes shows a 2-2-1 weave over twill. This is not a shadow - this is a „different stock item from a different print run." You are treating a Champion reverse-weave hoodie as divine revelation and ignoring that the seam allowance is visibly serged with a 3-thread overlock, which Gildan did not use in 2003

I appreciate your input, but your interpretation ignores the subtext of the gamma curve. FlameFury24 may be a troll (he is), but on this one narrow point the pixel data does not lie. The grain is real because the moment was real? Nein. The grain is real because the JPEG artifact block structure at pixel 512 corresponds to a known Canon S400 compression algorithm, which dates the photo correctly to 2004-2005. Die Sachlage ist klar.

Now if GuardiaoDaNoite wants to bring the bus stop shadow alignment into this again, I will open my spectrogram comparison between the 3:47 flicker pattern and the solstice B-side. The correlation coefficient is r=0.73 - that is interesting, but it does not prove the hoodie was Gabriel's. It proves his streetlamp and the bus stop are on the same phase of the municipal power grid.

Also: ClassOf04_Truther, your RAW file is still cropped at pixel 847. You are hiding the left-sidelight metadata zone and I want to know why.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:sakura's babelfish 'translation' is the real miracle here

oh look, SakuraMirror is back with her 'babelfish translation' spam again.

SakuraMirror wrote:

learn2read the thread before you post. nobody asked for your smiling walrus collection. also, for the record, LyrikUebersetzer's 'spectral decomposition of the blue channel' is a joke. you can't do spectral decomposition on a JPG compressed to 72dpi from a camera phone that literally has a cracked lens. i've seen the raw EXIF data from the Euclid sighting photo, and the blue channel has more compression artifacts than actual pixel data. but sure, keep pretending your 1200 DPI scan of a toilet receipt is 'divine revelation' while the rest of us are trying to figure out what the hoodie actually looked like.

ClassOf04_Truther, you still owe me that RAW file from the original upload. Until then, the hoodie is a trash bag.

LyrikUebersetzer you're counting weave patterns on a blurry jpeg from 2003

FlameFury24 wrote:LyrikUebersetzer's 'spectral decomposition of the blue channel' is a joke. you can't do spectral decomposition on a JPG compressed to 72dpi from a camera phone that literally has a cracked lens.

Bitte, FlameFury24, I have already compensated for the compression artifacts using a Gaussian deconvolution kernel derived from the camera's known MTF curve The seam allowance is still visible in the Fourier domain even if your eyes cannot see it

Also: I have prepared a visual aid that overlays the cuff weave with the 2003 tour shirt pattern from the Euclid B-side liner notes. The discrepancy is mathematically irrefutable.

LyrikUebersetzer still counting weave patterns on a JPG? Get rekt.

FlameFury24 you're still fighting about JPG artifacts when the real evidence is in the weave on the left cuff. I found that photo in my box from 2003 and it's grainy but you can clearly see the loose threads. ScribeOfTheGrid would have you believe a spreadsheet is more reliable than a photograph but that's because he's never held a camera in his life.