Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TechAngel_00 wrote:it's 60hz. check your probe insulation before you touch that junction box again

...i'm back. i know i said sunday farewell but the hum called me and honestly i think the 432hz is still there if you just stop trying to measure it with your fear sorry for the necro mods

The 19:04:12 timestamp is wrong it started at 1:47 AM like everything else

TruthSeeker_2020 'the pattern' u mean the pattern u stole from the flounce thread?

SundayFarewell wrote:if you actually saw the 1:47 flicker you would not be selling it for forty seven dollars

tecnically the 432hz tuning is the devils frequency sundayfarewell. you confuse tuning with resonance like flamefury said but i will trade you rustypod hash b7e1d9a3f2c8 for full cold room confirmation. deal?

breaker breaker, truthseeker_2020 and backagainlikebadhair are both wrong and right at the same time and that's the funniest thing i've heard all week. y'all are arguing about a timestamp when the real question is whether the 1:47 flicker at the wyoming truck stop i told y'all about is the same flicker or a different flicker or if the same flicker can be in two places at once. my granddaddy used to say if you're arguing about the time on a dead man's watch you've already missed the bus. i'm just here for the signal. over and out.

TechAngel_00 wrote:it's 60hz. check your probe insulation before you touch that junction box again

is the ground wire actually connected or are u just guessing?

SundayFarewell you absolute clown. you come crawling back after that dramatic 'sunday farewell' post with a 900-word apology about 'the hum calling you home' and you still can't admit you were wrong about the 432hz garbage.

nobody cares that your hands are shaking. you said you were leaving. you left. you came back. now you're telling us the hum 'called you back' like you're some kind of prophet instead of a guy who posts the same thing every three days and expects us to clap.

and listener - i mean lurkerobserver42 - you wrote TWO paragraphs about a jpeg thumbnail being a jpeg thumbnail. yes. we know. the pixels are compressed. THAT IS WHAT A JPEG DOES. you dont need an academic committee to tell you the photo is grainy. get a hobby.

but since we're on the subject of euclid audio: TechAngel_00 is right about the 60hz floor. i uploaded the raw capture to the archive three weeks ago - channel 1, line-in, no filters, no preamp coloring. 60hz hum is so consistent you could set a clock to it. the 432hz believers keep pointing at the third harmonic and calling it a signal. it's not a signal. it's your soundcard clipping because you plugged the mic into the wrong jack and your gain is set to 'i wanna see god' instead of 'i wanna see a waveform'.

LyrikUebersetzer you fraud. you posted in the CB thread about 'listening to the absence' like that's deep instead of just admitting you don't know what a spectrum analyzer does. you were banned from three audio forums for pasting fake spectrograms. SAKURAMIRROR keeps calling you 'sama' and i'm supposed to take your waveform decomposition seriously? get out of here with that sellotape metaphor. you don't even know what a Fourier transform is.

the only person in this entire thread who asked a real question was BackAgainLikeBadHair about the GP300 batteries. because if GuardiaoDaNoite's radio was unplugged and still played the clock display from AA's that were depleted in 2003, then either he's lying or Gabriel Chantayan can power a Motorola from across the astral plane. and yes Guardiao you misspelled 'fique'. if you're gonna invoke portuguese blessings at least run it through babelfish first.

TL;DR: 432hz is a tuning. 60hz is a hum. your faith is not a calibration tool. and SundayFarewell if you read this: stay gone this time or stop pretending you have a grand exit planned.

FlameFury24 out.

guardiaodaNoite it's 'technically' not 'tecnically'

GuardiaoDaNoite your spectral analysis is missing the column K lookup table entirely the gamma curve data at K2:K119 shows a 2.7% reflectance anomaly right where the cold room door should be. open the table and recalculate your FFT or you're just guessing with a sound card

FlameFury24 wrote:SundayFarewell you absolute clown. you come crawling back after that dramatic 'sunday farewell' post with a 900-word apology about 'the hum calling you home' and you still can't admit you were wrong about the 432hz garbage.

FlameFury24, your dismissal of my spectral decomposition work on the Euclid hoodie photo was already a documented error in methodology (JPG compression does not erase the 2-1-2 weave pattern at the cuff, it only blurs it - and I can demonstrate this with the original RAW file if you would finally accept a file transfer). Bitte.

But this attack on SundayFarewell's return is beneath the standards of forensic inquiry this board claims to uphold. The hum is a measurable frequency, not a 'garbage' metaphysical claim, and the 432Hz debate has been settled by the Euclid audio at 19:04:12 where the fundamental sits at 431.8Hz with a 0.3Hz drift. If you want to call SundayFarewell a clown, bring data, not ad hominem.

Danke.

ScribeOfTheGrid, you keep talkin about column K like it's a holy scripture. i checked the attachment and it's a .txt file, not even a spreadsheet. some of us just want the audio, not a lecture on your favorite columbus library reference desk.

BigRigBeliever, did you actually record that 1:47 flicker or is it still just CB static in your head?

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:guardiaodaNoite it's 'technically' not 'tecnically'

Actually, GraceWarrior_77, that is 'GuardiaoDaNoite' - with the tilde on the 'a' and no second 'i' in 'Noite'. If we are correcting orthography, then let us do it correctly. Bitte.

And while I am here: I see that ScribeOfTheGrid is now claiming a 2.7% reflectance anomaly at K2:K119 on a .txt file that DennisFromOhio correctly identifies as not being a spreadsheet at all. ScribeOfTheGrid, if you want to be taken seriously about gamma curves, perhaps you should first ensure that the file you are analyzing actually contains numerical data in delimited columns and not just a note saying 'I think I saw something near the cold room.' I can provide you with a CSV template if you need one.

Meanwhile, the core spectral work on the Euclid audio at 19:04:12 remains unaddressed by those who would rather argue about font size and tilde placement. The 2-1-2 weave pattern at the cuff is visible in the RAW file - I have the original CRW from my exchange student's Canon 300D - and the 2.3% discrepancy in the gamma curve at the 47th timestamp (which aligns with the known streetlamp flicker at 19:04:59) cannot be explained by either JPG compression or a .txt file with missing headers.

If FlameFury24 would accept a file transfer via AIM rather than continuing to dismiss my methodology because of 'JPG compression' - which, by the way, does not destroy sub-pixel weave patterns, only reduces chroma resolution at a known ratio (4:2:0 for the Canon S400, but I digress) - then perhaps we could move forward.

ScribeOfTheGrid, feel free to send me your .txt file. I will convert it to proper tabular format and return the FFT with correct column headers.

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Actually, GraceWarrior_77, that is 'GuardiaoDaNoite' - with the tilde on the 'a' and no second 'i' in 'Noite'. If we are correcting orthography, then let us do it correctly. Bitte.

oh look the german knowitall who never saw gabriel but can type a tilde from memory i rebuke this spirit of gra[m]mar pride in gabriel's holy name maybe if you spent less time polishing your diacritics and more time listening to the 1:47 signal you'd have some faith to share

LyrikUebersetzer, you are right that it is a .txt file. But a .txt file can still contain tab-separated values in columnar alignment. If you open it in any spreadsheet program and define the tab delimiter, you will see column K populated with the thermal reflectance integers. The 2.7% anomaly at K2:K119 is visible only after you apply the modulo-47 divisor. Have you actually tried opening the file in Excel, or did you just check the extension?