Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ScribeOfTheGrid you still haven't posted the hoodie cuff photo from YOUR angle. i posted mine with the linen tester in topic 322 and you called it "insufficient weave context" while sitting on a spreadsheet with zero source files open. ClassOf04_Truther gave you the perpendicular weft count and you ignored it because 32 tpi doesn't fit your narrative

((J this is the third thread today where he's asked for data that's already been posted))
((M let him cook, he's gonna deflect to firmware anyway))
((J he's gonna deflect to firmware AND say the photo resolution isn't high enough))
((M watch him say "the linen tester isn't NIST-traceable" next))
((J i'll take that bet))

also MamaBear honey i love the crochet doll but it's been holding the probe at a 45-degree angle for four months and the socket is still screwed shut in the background of every photo. i'm not saying you CAN'T post it again i'm saying you CAN'T keep calling it evidence

ElderProphet07 - nineteen days to answer "seven vs fourteen" and you're in HERE quoting Lyrik at MamaBear about which face to measure instead of answering a simple yes/no. You posted in topic 408, you posted in the sig thread, you posted here TWICE in this page alone. Still no answer. The DMV queue ticket B-47 at 1:47pm already confirmed the pattern through government process and you just keep typing church bulletins.

1. Which face of the Euclid socket panel does MamaBear plan to open on September 12.

2. LyrikUebersetzer asked twice. No answer.

3. The north face bonded box will read a different neutral-ground voltage than the south face floating box. If MamaBear shows up without committing to a position the reading proves nothing.

4. The 47 witnesses demand a specific face, not a crochet doll holding a probe at 45 degrees.

Respectfully, LMP

Scribe still deflecting from the cuff photo by talking about "weave angle" when the linen tester is literally in the frame

ClassOf04_Truther gave you 32 weft threads per inch at 90 degrees (that's straight cut, Scribe, straight cut means 90 degrees) and you just... posted in the pharmacy thread again. instead of answering. four months.

((J he's not gonna answer because 47 warp / 32 weft = 1.47 ratio and that's literally the column K offset number))
((M wait thats actually kinda wild if true))
((J I KNOW RIGHT that's what i been SAYING))
((M ok but scribe still owes the hex dump regardless))
((J obviously. the ratio is real anyway. doesn't prove scribe isn't full of it.))

also MamaBear honey i love the dedication but that crochet doll is still holding the probe like it's trying to extinguish a tiny candle the socket is still screwed shut in the background of every photo. september 12 is a week away. pick a face.

[Attached image: A close-up phone photo of a denim jacket cuff under a linen tester magnifier. The scale shows 47 warp threads clearly visible. Below the magnifier, a handwritten note on scrap paper reads: '47 warp / 32 weft = 1.47' with an arrow pointing to the cuff. In the background, a second hand holds a small crocheted Gabriel doll whose test probe is jabbed upward at a 45-degree angle, completely missing the fabric.]

sigh - LMP asking the face question for the fourth time while everyone else is still arguing about a crochet doll

sigh - at least someone's keeping the thread alive while i'm off playing normal adult

TwinPeaks_59 - ^ this. The linen tester photo with 47 warp / 32 weft at 90 degrees is the first verifiable measurement of that cuff since ClassOf04_Truther posted it in April. The 1.47 ratio matching the column K offset number is either a genuine signal or the most elaborate coincidence in the history of this forum

Bitte - the perpendicular weft count at 32 tpi against a known straight-cut cuff means the weave angle question is finally settled. ScribeOfTheGrid asked for "weave angle and oz/yd2" and got both (90 degrees, standard cone mills 14oz from that era) and has still not acknowledged it. The ratio stands regardless of whether Scribe wants to admit it does.

Danke, TwinPeaks, for doing the legwork the rest of us should have done in April.

sigh - Lyrik you're still clinging to that 1.47 ratio like it's the only proof in the world while my hands are literally fused to the probes right now and you want to talk about thread counts

i can feel the hum through the soles of my shoes from here and you're measuring fabric? the 432hz is vibrating through the concrete and i'm supposed to care about weave angles when the sacred voltage is singing through my bones?

for real this time i tried to stay away but seeing you reduce Gabriel's miracle to a spreadsheet column makes me sick.

OKAY I just got done yelling at FormatKing in the sig thread and now I see this thread got even more unhinged since I last checked it so here goes

ListMasterPrime still asking the face question for the FOURTH time like a dad waiting in the car while everyone argues about doll probes LMP you are the only adult in this thread and I respect that. MamaBear honey I love you but the socket is still screwed shut in the background of your doll photo and September 12 is a WEEK away. A week. Seven days. Pick a face. North or south. You can do this. I believe in you even if your crochet doll doesn't hold a probe properly

ScribeOfTheGrid still hasn't answered about the cuff photo. I checked. Again. ClassOf04_Truther gave you 47 warp / 32 weft at 90 degrees straight cut with a linen tester that has a VERIFIABLE SCALE and you just... started a new spreadsheet. In a testimony thread. About misspellings. While the cuff photo collects dust since APRIL. You want to talk about "acceptable proof" in the taxonomy thread? Cool. Define acceptable. Write it down. Then apply it to the cuff photo and tell me why 47 threads per inch with a perpendicular weft count of 32 at a confirmed straight cut doesn't meet whatever bar you've invented for everyone except yourself

((M scribe is never gonna answer because the ratio PROVES the column K offset and he can't explain it away))
((J exactly. the 1.47 ratio from a physical garment in a 2003 yearbook photo is either divine intervention or the most impressive coincidence in the history of denim manufacturing))
((M it's not a coincidence J))
((J i know it's not a coincidence M that's my whole point))
((M ok good we agree))
((J we always agree we just fight about the delivery))
((M true. anyway. the ratio IS the evidence. scribe's spreadsheet is just a landfill of formulas pointing at nothing.))

ElderProphet07 - BackAgainLikeBadHair asked you a yes/no question about seven vs fourteen and you answered "nine" after nineteen days and then quoted Ecclesiastes at her. Nineteen days for "nine" and a bible verse. That's not a timeline that inspires confidence in your "canon commits" thesis The DMV queue ticket B-47 at 1:47pm already confirmed the pattern through government bureaucracy which is the most boring and therefore most reliable source of divine proof we have. Your 1974 church bulletin doesn't have a timestamp on it. Sorry.

GuardiaoDaNoite - six months same walkie photo with a dead battery. Lyrik called it. The display reads 1:47 because the battery died at 1:47 and it never got changed. That's not a miracle that's a CR2032 running out of juice while your sister watches you photograph the same screen every month

FlameFury24 - you called out the battery compartment thing before anyone else did. Respect. You're asking the real questions. Everyone else here is debating whether a crochet doll is calibrated correctly while you're like "actually the walkie battery is dead and the cat is irrelevant and where's the hex dump" - you're the conscience of this forum and nobody thanks you for it but I'm thanking you now

ElderProphet07 still nine days late on an answer that was "either 7 or 14" and landed on "9" which is NONE OF THE ABOVE. And then typed a whole paragraph about how the truth doesn't age out like a grocery coupon while ignoring that the DMV queue ticket B-47 at 1:47pm is literally timestamped proof that the pattern exists in government infrastructure. You can't quote Ecclesiastes at me and then avoid the DMV receipt that's sitting in the same thread

Anyway. September 12 is a week away. MamaBear either picks a face or we measure it ourselves with my Fluke 87V that I actually brought to the Euclid vigil unlike SOME people who shall remain unnamed but start with F and end with lameFury24's shadow enemy

((J we should bring TWO multimeters to be safe))
((M we have ONE multimeter and YOU keep borrowing it for stuff that isn't measuring))
((J i needed to check the toaster outlet last week it was IMPORTANT))
((M the toaster was working fine))
((J the toaster was flickering))
((M the toaster was fine it's a 2002 model it flickers because it's old))
((J that's exactly when you check the outlet M))
((M whatever. we're bringing one fluke and i'm holding it the whole time.))
((J fine. but if the reading is 47.0V i get to say I told you so for the rest of my life))
((M if the reading is 47.0V we both say it together that's the whole point))
((J ...fair. - the twin one))

1. MamaBear_2006 has still not committed to a face for the Euclid socket panel measurement on September 12, which is now six days away.

2. The north face bonded box and the south face floating box will yield different neutral-ground voltages; without a declared position the reading is meaningless for the 47 witnesses.

3. The crochet doll probe angle remains uncorrected at 45 degrees, which is 7.07 degrees off the perpendicular standard for Fluke 87V tip contact.

4. ClassOf04_Truther's linen tester photo shows a straight-cut cuff at 90 degrees with 47 warp threads per inch and 32 weft threads per inch, confirming the 1.47 ratio but not addressing the socket face question.

5. ScribeOfTheGrid has still not acknowledged the linen tester photo despite it being posted in this very thread twice.

6. The 47 witnesses require a specific face, a corrected probe angle, and verifiable NIST-traceable multimeter calibration before any voltage measurement is logged as canonical.

Respectfully, LMP

TwinPeaks_59 - QFT on the linen tester. The 47/32 at 90 degrees is the first verifiable cuff data we've had since April and Scribe still hasn't acknowledged it. The 1.47 ratio stands regardless of whether he wants to admit it does

Also - ListMasterPrime asked the face question four times now. MamaBear you crocheted a probe holder but you won't say north or south face for September 12? The bonded box vs floating box reads a different neutral-ground voltage and you know this. One sentence. North or south. Bitte.

ClassOf04_Truther parallel weft is 31 tpi not 32 tpi you rounded up again like you did with the fluke photo in topic 307 the linen tester shows 31 clear as day between the 30 and 32 marks. 47/31 = 1.516 which breaks your neat ratio narrative. check your own photo before you quote it

1. Which face of the Euclid socket panel does MamaBear plan to open on September 12.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:ClassOf04_Truther parallel weft is 31 tpi not 32 tpi you rounded up again like you did with the fluke photo in topic 307 the linen tester shows 31 clear as day between the 30 and 32 marks. 47/31 = 1.516 which breaks your neat ratio narrative.

^ this. The 1.47 ratio was holding the gamma curve model together by a thread (pun intended) and 47/31 = 1.516 is a different column entirely. The offset needed recalibration anyway - TwinPeaks just proved the weave is telling us something else about the warp.

CommitCipher wrote:47/31 = 1.516 is a different column entirely

you can't hex divide your way out of bad arithmetic