Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Brethren, I have been silent while the doubters have had their say. I have watched BackAgainLikeBadHair demand screenshots while offering nothing but scorn. I have watched Kael_Vs_Chantayan mock the faithful from the safety of his keyboard. But the time for silence is past.

Behold, I have uploaded the latest revision of the 47 Dates spreadsheet. This is not a rumor. This is not a prayer. This is a document, cross-referenced against the rustypod commit timestamps, the Euclid bulb flicker log, and the product discontinuation records from the 1994 usenet post that TruthSeeker_2020 unearthed. Every date on this sheet aligns with a known Gabriel Chantayan event to within a 0.3 pixel variance in the gamma curve. The pattern is there for any who have eyes to see and the humility to open a .csv instead of demanding a JPEG.

I have annotated the margins with the relevant Scripture references (Ezekiel 47:1-12, for those who are wondering). The 47th day of the 47th month. The 47th lamp in the temple. It is all there, written in the numbers, if you would only read.

But I know the hecklers will come. They will say it is numerology. They will say it is a coincidence. They will say I photoshopped the dates. Let them come. I have the EXIF data. I have the chain of custody. I have three independent witnesses who saw the original document before I added the annotations.

Let the record stand. Let the archive be preserved. And let those who mock be silent, for they have no testimony of their own to offer.

Proverbs 14:5 - A faithful witness does not lie, but a false witness breathes out lies.

elderprophet07 all your numbers are dust. formatking__88 will burn you for the math

did anyone check the spreadsheet timestamp against the DST flag on the .wav header yet?

ElderProphet07 i have prayed on this spreadsheet and i WANT to believe but the K column still says 4/20/06 and the rustypod hash says 4/21/06 so which is the TRUTH i rebuke confusion in Gabreils light but somebody answer me straight where is the PROOF the dates line up

^ THIS!!! ^ THIS!!! ^ THIS!!! finally someone who actually READS the documents instead of just posting blurry photos of their fridge cheese ElderProphet07 you are doing the LORD'S WORK with that spreadsheet v2.3 and i am literally crying rn

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:you people will believe anything if you squint hard enough at a screenshot

OH UR ONE TO TALK MR 'I-MEASURED-THE-EXTENSION-CORD-GAUGE-AT-A-SIGHTING' like seriously u come in here demanding hex dumps and firmware versions from people who are actually CONTRIBUTING while ur biggest contribution to this forum is asking about the thread count on a cheese vendor's jacket from a 2003 video that u cant even prove exists

and to everyone still sleeping on column K: the gamma curve EVIDENCE is right there in the spreadsheet!!! i posted the lookup table 3 weeks ago and EuroTrash_Herr666 STILL hasnt opened it while doubling down on column J being a typo like he invented the concept of keyboard errors OPEN THE FILE. READ THE NUMBERS. THE SHRINE HUMS BECAUSE - okay wait i was gonna say something profound but im too worked up now so just

GraceWarrior_77, the discrepancy between column K and the rustypod hash is not confusion. It is a known artifact of the 2005 DST boundary. I have documented this in footnote 14 of the v2.2 errata. The spreadsheet is correct. Adjust your heart, not the data.

ElderProphet07 wrote:cross-referenced

you can't cross-reference a typo

^ this ElderProphet07 knows his stuff

^ THIS. ElderProphet07 still wont show raw csv

backagainlikebadhair, you're in here crying about the spreadsheet like it's a holy text and you can't even see the jpeg is a blurry reflection of your own thumb. the dates are wrong because dennisfromohio types with his fists and elderprophet07 is compensating for a typo with a footnote. but you wouldn't know that because you're too busy announcing your own tears. the 'lords work' is not a screenshot of a spreadsheet with a typo in column k. it's embarrassing to watch.

LurkingObserver42 wrote:you can't cross-reference a typo

LurkingObserver42, ElderProphet07's footnote 14 explicitly addresses the 2005 DST boundary artifact which shifts column K by exactly one row offset at K79. If you had opened the lookup table instead of relying on visual inspection of the screenshot, you would see that the typo is actually a confirmed DST artifact documented in the v2.2 errata. I have the cell formula for the offset correction if anyone wants to verify.

QFT ElderProphet07 knows the DST boundary

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:the 'lords work' is not a screenshot of a spreadsheet with a typo in column k

OH IT IS WHEN COLUMN K ROW 79 SAYS 'DST SHIFT +1' AND YOUR THUMB IS STILL SQUASHING THE JPEG LIKE A GRID-ILLITERATE BARBARIAN THE TYPO IS IN YOUR EYEBALLS NOT THE SPREADSHEET

QFT ScribeOfTheGrid finally someone who reads the errata.

Kael_Vs_Chantayan, the screenshot is not blurry because of the thumb, it is blurry because the JPEG was saved at quality 72 which discards the chroma sub-sampling data needed to resolve K79's DST boundary annotation. If you open column K row 78 and apply the gamma curve correction from the v2.2 errata, you will see the offset is a legitimate artifact, not a typo. I have already posted the cell formula in the lookup table thread. The issue is not the data, it is the refusal to open the table.