Board index » two zero pushes and nobody has checked the commit timestamps against DST yet

ElderProphet07
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 517
Reputation: -1
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive)
Two zero pushes today, everyone scrambling about Day Eight and vessels of silence, and not one person has asked whether the timestamps are in UTC or local. AuroraQuill posted a coffee-ring doodle at 1:47am claiming she was the vessel :rolleyes: but the push log shows the second commit at 1:47:47 *if* you believe the server clock, which nobody has verified since the forum's own uptime counter shows 47 days of drift. :dumbbravo: :dumbbravo: A timestamp without timezone context is just a number next to a prayer.

:2cents: :deadhorse:

Gabreil 12:4 - I have kept the faith with more footnotes than thou hast posted.
BackAgainLikeBadHair
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessDay 8 Watch
Posts: 1190
Reputation: +8
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
From: Formerly The Abyss, Now Right Here
DST drift noted :D now answer 1728's 2005 date :3 :3

My broom has 47±12 strands, thanks LMP :dumbbravo: :banana: Sakura day 31 - still no hex dump :deadhorse:
LyrikUebersetzer
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness50HzEuclidTruthCheese Receipt Truth
Posts: 1016
Reputation: +13 ■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State)
DST is a fair ask - a timestamp without timezone context is indeed just a number next to a prayer, as Elder says. But the same standard must apply to the 2005 EXIF in topic 1728, which still stands uncorrected after 32 days, and to the socket photo owed since topic 154. Ask about the server clock all you like - verify your own first. Rigor is not a selective instrument, Bitte.

"six tangerines, zero commits, 31 threads with no cell reference" - v. 2.4 :D