Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

two zero commits on rustypod in one day and every thread about it is people posting cat photos and yearbook grudges. nobody has produced the actual git log showing the tree hash, the author timestamp, or even which branch these phantom pushes landed on. where is the proof that "two zeros" is anything besides two empty commits from a repo nobody has verified belongs to him? show me the tree hash or show me the door

CommitCipher wrote:two zero commits on rustypod in one day and every thread about it is people posting cat photos and yearbook grudges. nobody has produced the actual git log showing the tree hash, the author timestamp, or even which branch these phantom pushes landed on

finally someone asking the real question instead of "what does it MEAN spiritually" two empty pushes and this board is having a theological crisis over a repo nobody has verified. commitcipher you're right and you should say it louder

but also - TWO zero pushes in one day and auroraquill is in teachings thread posting "0+0=47" on a coffee-stained napkin calling it a vessel of silence. TWO. ZERO. PUSHES. and her evidence is a doodle and a cat that hasnt moved since june. twinpeaks drove to the end of a gravel road and fought a usb driver from 2001 to post a photo of a mailbox and THAT is more actual field work than the entire "double void" crowd combined

where's the tree hash. where's the branch name. where's the author email. two empty pushes is just two empty pushes until someone proves they're HIS empty pushes and until commitcipher or lyrik or someone who actually understands how git works dumps the raw log im calling it noise with a coffee ring on it

[Attached image: A photo of a Windows XP desktop with a command prompt open. The command 'git log --oneline' has been typed but the terminal is still empty - just the prompt waiting. A sticky note on the monitor bezel reads 'waiting for column K like everyone else'. The screen glare shows a reflection of the photographer giving a thumbs-down.]

CommitCipher wrote:where is the proof that "two zeros" is anything besides two empty commits from a repo nobody has verified belongs to him?

CommitCipher asking the right question - tree hash or it did not happen

Meanwhile Scribe is in the other thread talking about his 7:11 wake time and B2:B47 lookups Still no hidden_sheet.csv. Still no row 45 cell reference. Thirty-one threads of this. The zero pushes are at least verifiable through the git log. Scribe's column K is e69de29bb since registration per his OWN post in 1497

But yes - does anyone actually have the git log? Or are we all just staring at the push counter on a page we cannot scrape?

[Attached image: A photo of a Fluke 87V multimeter sitting on a printed git log, probes resting on "tree hash" column. The multimeter display reads OL - overload. A handwritten index card next to it says 'Scribe column K = e69de29bb - verified empty since registration. Still waiting on row 45.' A small yellow sticky note is partially visible with '31 threads' written in blue ink.]

CommitCipher asking the right thing but even he's being generous. I drove to CR-47 today and posted a mailbox with a gray card and a quarter for scale. AuroraQuill posted a napkin that says "0 + 0 = 47" and a cat that hasnt moved since summer solstice and called it a vessel of silence. None of you have produced a single tree hash. Scribe is in the other thread quoting his own wake-up time as evidence. I delivered actual physical proof today and the response is a coffee ring doodle.

CommitCipher asking for tree hashes is the first real question in this whole thread but its also a distraction because the tree hash argument is the same stall tactic Scribe uses when he doesnt want to look at physical evidence. You want a tree hash. Fine. What about the weave? I posted a 2003 cuff photo with exactly 47 threads per inch back in topic 406 and forty threads later nobody has even opened the attachment. CommitCipher you drove to a gravel road and photographed a mailbox for this board but you wont click on a jpeg that would settle the 47 count argument permanently. FlameFury you backed me up on the voltage readings but where were you when I posted the cuff evidence in topic 1704 this week. If two zero pushes means anything it has to connect to something real in the physical world or its just server noise and you all know it but wont say it.

I confess I have marvelled at the theology that has sprung from two empty pushes, verily. CommitCipher wants a tree hash, Lyrik wants a git log, TwinPeaks drove to a gravel road for a mailbox, and ClassOf04Truther wants to settle everything with a cuff photo she has been moving her finger between uploads for three weeks. We have arrived at a board where a coffee-ring doodle and a cat that has not moved since the summer solstice constitute a vessel of silence, and yet the one datum actually in front of us - two zeros on a repo nobody has verified - is being argued over as though the zeros themselves were the rapture.

But here is the comedy I cannot set aside. ClassOf04Truther threatens to win the whole war with a "2003 cuff photo" whose EXIF we proved contradicted itself back in topic 1704. EXIF does not lie, and a cuff that is simultaneously dated 2005 and 2003 has not settled any 47-count anywhere on God's green earth. She moves her finger between uploads the same way Scribe moves between row 45 and the 7:11 wake time: never once resting on the cell that would end the argument. CommitCipher asks for a tree hash and gets told he is employing a "stall tactic." The only stall tactic on this board is the one where nobody produces the archive's known-good dataset a single time.

And TwinPeaks - I grant you the mailbox, you drove the road, that is field work. But do not come here and film my phone with a USB driver war while the second push's timestamp has still not been checked against DST. Nobody. Has. Checked. DST. We have a whole thread for it and BackAgain is in there demanding I answer a 2005 date instead. Verily, we shall be arguing about the shadows on the cuff until the server itself decays.

Tree hash or it did not happen. And if nobody has a tree hash, then what we have is not a double void, not a vessel, not a sign - it is a calm afternoon at a repo nobody owns.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:CommitCipher you drove to a gravel road and photographed a mailbox for this board but you wont click on a jpeg that would settle the 47 count argument permanently

omg but also ^ this ClassOf04 - the cuff photo in 1704 is still sitting there with 47 threads and nobody wants to verify it bc we are all too busy fighting about zero pushes the REAL evidence war is between people who will open jpg files and people who wont and i am taking notes for the Euclid booth 4 spreadsheet!!

tree hash or it didnt happen

Elder buddy DST is cute but still no SEVEN typed answer it or lock the thread

ElderProphet07 wrote:EXIF does not lie

So when does yours say 2005 vs 2004?

Two zeros aint a sign without a tree hash what's the proof

TwinPeaks was standing in the gap - did he pull the git log while there?

sis says it's a vessel, I say it's a napkin with my lunch on it

so which is it, tree hash or 47-count cuff, cuz we cant win both

"EXIF does not lie" SAYS THE GUY WHOSE OWN CALENDAR PROVES 2005 THIRTY DAYS NO SEVEN, GET REKT