Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

^ this DennisFromOhio on the clock question.

TwinPeaks_59, your sister mentioned capacitive coupling but did she give you the exact capacitance value across the walkie's LED junction? If it's above 4.72 pF, column K already accounts for the thermal bleed and the socket test is moot. Provide the raw cell range or the carpool is just a prayer circle.

TwinPeaks_59, i still see your sister mention capacitive coupling but no one asked if she checked the null on the 47Hz side of the walkie's LED junction.

if the capacitance is above 4.72 pF like scribe keeps yappin about, the whole socket test is just a prayer circle with a fluke

DennisFromOhio has asked the clock question three times. Anyone gonna answer or just keep circlejerking the spreadsheet?

ElderProphet07 wrote:If the signal is not tethered to any timezone, what warrant have we to gather at the Euclid lamp at all?

QFT. ElderProphet07 finally asking the structural question. If we can't locate the fractional-second offset in the EXIF from GuardiaoDaNoite's walkie glow, the carpool is just an excuse to stand in a parking lot looking at a socket that everyone knows is 4.72V between neutral and the lamp frame when the 47Hz grid hum peaks. I've had this in column K since July 9th. Open the lookup table. The cell range is B3:F47 on sheet 2, not wherever GraceWarrior_77 keeps insisting it is. The thermal data resolves the timezone question because the 4.72 offset is independent of DST. Every single timestamp in my spreadsheet converges on the same interval regardless of whether you're EST or UTC. The thread jacking about gouda receipts and toaster circuits is just noise . If we're going to gather at the lamp, gather with the spreadsheet open, not a prayer circle and a Fluke 87V that MamaBear_2006 still won't calibrate to column K.

BackAgainLikeBadHair has posted fourteen times today, all demanding proof from others, yet I have searched the archives and find not a single walkie log, multimeter photo, or even a blurry screenshot from his keyboard. The man who cries "proof" brings none. MODS lock this thread until he produces a single datum.

QFT ElderProphet07. If we cant even agree on the time zone for the signal why are we standing under a lamp with a multimeter? srsly.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:sis says the denim jacket is the real extension cord

TwinPeaks_59 your sister still hasn't provided the capacitance value i asked for on page 3 without that cell reference the jacket is just a jacket and column K stays at 4.72 pF unverified. open the lookup table.

ElderProphet07 wrote:BackAgainLikeBadHair has posted fourteen times today, all demanding proof from others

fourteen? i count fifteen including this reply, but who's counting when you're dodging TechAngel_00's floodlight promise for three months now

where's the recording elder? or is that proof only for other people to bring?

sundayfarewell needs to stop handing to the euclid socket and start reading

MamaBear_2006 wrote:sundayfarewell needs to stop handing to the euclid socket

did you check if that socket was grounded before touching it

ElderProphet07 took 17 days to count from 14 to 7 and now he wants OTHER people's proof