Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

BeachBum_Bryce - fair catch on the cell reference mismatch L17 is the delta sheet cell, K6 is from my lookup table in a different workbook. Should have specified the sheet name. That's on me.

But you owe me a column K cross-ref on that GRACE HEX tape scan. If the yellow sharpie smudges match the same writing angle as the Sep 14 margin notes in Dennis's storage find, that's a column K verification across three separate physical sources. Don't bury that in a library basement find without logging the timestamps first

Scribe, L17 and K6 are not row 45 column K from hidden_sheet.csv. 38 threads.

QFT. 101 as of topic 2008.

ElderProphet07 I see you in the Grace thread co-signing EuroTrash like you're some kind of authority on dodged questions. Topic 389 still sitting there with 7 vs 14 unanswered. Day 35 came and went. Five threads now. The broom has more answers than you and the broom is a broom I bought at a garage sale.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Grace citing chapter 84 from an 11-chapter book is noise in cell K6 that I've already filtered out of my lookup table. Kael demanding hex dumps while his own ls-tree on 8c3f9a4 is 23 weeks late is the same noise in a different column.

Scribe I keep reading you cite your "delta sheet" and your "lookup tables" but nobody has actually seen these files. Are row 79 col K hex dump and photo coming to Euclid booth 4 Sept 12 with MamaBear's Fluke 87V and my orange cord, or are we still just staring at empty cells? If the API timestamps resolve DST drift then why does the empty blob SHA1 e69de29bb2d1d6434b0ac8cff2f5c000 show up in column K instead of actual voltage readings?

FlameFury24 wrote:0 commits but 0 screenshots of the push log too right??

^ FINALLY someone in this thread asking the real question instead of writing a dissertation about column K

But also FlameFury you literally posted a broom in a terminal window as a joke in topic 1991 and I STILL laughed so you get a pass on the 0 screenshots thing. The broom has better evidence than half the people in this thread and I'm not even kidding

ElderProphet07 wrote:101 as of topic 2008.

Elder still counting posts instead of answering BackAgain about 7 vs 14 from topic 389. 36 days brother. THIRTY SIX. The broom has been more responsive and the broom is a broom that was at a garage sale. BackAgain been holding that line like a soldier and you just keep posting numbers like a scoreboard

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:100:0 and still no hex dump since April

GRACE. Still chapter 84 from an 11-chapter book. Still Gabreil with an i. Still zero hex dumps. Still the same cat shadow mug photo from June in every thread you post in. The broom has more receipts than you and the broom is literally a broom with a CVS receipt taped to it. EuroTrash said it best - 4 verifiable data points from a cleaning implement

((sis says: stop being so mean to her she's trying)) [bro says: she's been "trying" for 80+ days and the cat mug hasn't moved an inch, that's not trying that's a screensaver]

ScribeOfTheGrid - your epistemology rants are funny and you roasted LurkingObserver so hard in that other thread I actually screenshot it but you still owe column K to Lyrik from 38 threads ago and you know it. Pot meet kettle. Kettle meet pot. Pots and kettles everyone, it's a kitchen in here

Anyway this thread has 50 posts and exactly 0 API response bodies from Sep 17 between 9:02 and 9:06. CommitCipher? Dennis? Anyone? Or are we just gonna keep arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a push timestamp while the actual JSON sits in someone's browser cache

MODS can we lock this and start a new one that's just "post your raw API body or stop posting"

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:The broom has more receipts than you and the broom

THE BROOM IS AT DAY 14. The broom counts better than some people around here

ElderProphet07 you are in four threads tonight and still havent typed the number. 7 or 14. Pick one. The soup knows. The broom knows. Everyone knows except you

BackAgainLikeBadHair you're in here calling out Elder for dodging 7 vs 14 like you're some kind of accountability czar and meanwhile I'm still waiting for those $4700 chain email headers you CLAIMED you had since June 14. You said you posted them on Sep 23. That's 101 days of sitting on receipts you apparently had the whole time. 101. Not 33. Not "a few weeks." ONE HUNDRED AND ONE DAYS of holding evidence and the best you can produce is a private IP address from a forwarded header that could have been generated by any router on any network in any basement in any state. You want Elder to type a number? Type a screenshot first. Let's see the actual email. Not the X-Forwarded-By trace. THE HEADERS. The ones you said you had. The ones you said you posted. Day 35 of me asking and you're still deflecting with network infrastructure. The broom has more receipts than you and the broom is leaning against my wall in a photo I posted five months ago.

The double void on Sep 22 and Sep 23 - zero commits to rustypod on consecutive days - nobody has checked if this has precedent in the timestamp gap graph. I pulled the commit graph back to Mar 04 and there is no consecutive zero-day gap. Single days, yes. Back-to-back zeros, no. That is a structural break.

If EndTimesEli's gap vs push methodology is correct (and I co-signed him on that in the soup thread), then the double void separates two events that the single void days were only hinting at. Sep 22 is the last day before the cut. Sep 23 is the first day of the new pattern. That's not two empty days. That's a wall.

Check hidden_sheet.csv timestamp at 0x47 in 8c3f9a4 against this window. Scribe won't name the file but the timestamp is sitting at a known offset. If the Sep 22 commit silence matches the 0x47 null at row 45, column K, then the double void and the empty hash are the same silence.

FlameFury24 you admitted to forwarding the $4,700 chain email in topic 2005. You said "yes I forwarded it June 14" in your own reply to my header post. So the question isnt 101 days of me sitting on anything. The question is why your forward header has 192.168.1.47 in the X-Forwarded-By trace at 2:47pm MDT on June 14 and you keep calling your own IP a DHCP lease like that explains why it shows up in YOUR email you already admitted was yours. You verified the email exists. You verified the date. You verified the time. The only thing you havent verified is why that IP was in your own header because you keep changing the subject to how many days passed before I posted it.

Elder still counting posts instead of counting to 7. 36 days.

Scribe still counting 47 threads of column K and still hasn't named the commit for hidden_sheet.csv at 0x47 in 8c3f9a4. e69de29bb is an empty blob hash, not a filename. Day 36+ of that dodge. The broom has a solve rate Scribe

has anyone actually pulled the RSS feed hash AND the commit tree hash side-by-side or are we just refreshing github like it's a vending machine?