Board index » Offline spreadsheet test: the formula held without Excel. What does that prove? :rolleyes:| ScribeOfTheGrid Inner Circle ★★★★★     Posts: 1631 Reputation: -1 ■ Joined: Jul 17, 2006 From: Row 42, Column 9 | Left the laptop at home intentionally today. 3pm break, recalculated the SUMIF from memory against the notebook scrobbles. If the coordinate system is real, it should survive the tool. It held to three decimal places. So here's my question for anyone who actually measures instead of posting hashes: if the formula survives without the spreadsheet, does that make it MORE likely to be a discovered signal or LESS? I have a hypothesis but I want to see who else has done this test.  COLUMN K OR GTFO -- COUNTIF trade still open Grammar_Vigil -- rustypod resolves to 0x2F, check your XOR |
| LyrikUebersetzer Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1705 Reputation: +20 ■■■ Joined: Jun 20, 2006 From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State) | The formula held without Excel but row 45 column K is still e69de29bb since April  when does the cell reference arrive with the spreadsheet test LyrikUebersetzer | translational accuracy is not a feeling | 47 hatch lines confirmed 2001 quarterly p.47 | DAS BLATT IST ECHT, DIE ZAHLEN SIND SPUREN |
| CornfieldCrazy_82 Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 526 Reputation: +16 ■■ Joined: Sep 26, 2006 AIM: CornCrazy82 From: Kansas, USA (the flat part) | omg scribe this is like... so deep O.O but wait lol if u can do it from memory does that mean the formula is inside u now??  honestly i dont even know what a SUMIF is yet hehe but if it held without the laptop thats gotta mean something right?? ;) ;) ~*~<3~*~
buster for prophet 2k6 <3 kansas maze walk oct!! come get in my car lol  ~~~~ |
| GraceWarrior_77 Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 1816 Reputation: -3 ■ Joined: Jul 02, 2006 From: 2 Chronicles 7:14 |
"The book is open and the count is 31." - GraceWarrior_77, Oct 20 2006. Gabreil 31:4.  |
| BestBuddyStar Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1303 Reputation: +0 ■ Joined: Jun 02, 2006 From: In Gabriel's Heart ^_^ | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Left the laptop at home intentionally today. 3pm break, recalculated the SUMIF from memory against the notebook scrobbles. If the coordinate system is real, it should survive the tool. It held to three decimal places. Scribe doing SUMIF from memory but row 45 col K still ghosting us with e69de29bb since April  The formula holds but we need the hash and my orange 16awg cord + MamaBear's Fluke 87V at Euclid booth 4 Sept 12 will give you BOTH  <3
waiting on TEST 47 wav + oct 13 headers, one bus ride from booth 4, ^___^ <3  |
| Grammar_Vigil Devoted ★★★★      Posts: 445 Reputation: +6 ■ Joined: Aug 25, 2006 AIM: gr4mm4rV From: Warsaw, Poland | GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Gabreil 4:11 says the watcher and the watched are the same light and that truck saw YOU comin same as you saw it  I have to stop everything and address this because this is now the third distinct text you have attributed to "Gabreil 4:11" on this board within the span of a single week. In the newcomers thread, Gabreil 4:11 read: "The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few" -- which is, as has been demonstrated exhaustively, Matthew 9:37 from the King James Bible. In the bank statement thread, you cited it again with entirely different wording: "the kingdom shows up in the waiting room, not the throne room." And now, in *this* thread, on the Teachings board of all places, Gabreil 4:11 has shapeshifted once more into "the watcher and the watched are the same light." So which is it?  Chapter 4, verse 11 of a text you claim has been divinely revealed to you -- and yet you cannot keep its contents consistent from one post to the next. This is not testimony. This is improvisation. You are writing new material in real time and stapling the same citation to whatever suits the moment, which is precisely the sort of thing one does when one has no source material and is counting on nobody checking. And nobody on this board checks. That is what frustrates me. Scribe will not check his own column K. BestBuddyStar will not check his own methodology. And Grace will not check her own *fiction*, because checking it would require her to admit that Gabreil 4:11 is not a fixed text with a fixed meaning but a slot machine she pulls every time she needs a decorative sentence  ElderProphet07 was right -- this is transposition from memory with the assumption that nobody will open a second browser tab. Except in this case it is worse than memory, because memory at least *attempts* consistency. You are not misremembering. You are composing. I will also note, since it apparently must be said every single visit, that the name is still spelled incorrectly. You are writing "Gabreil" in a post on the Teachings board. The word is *Gabriel*. If you are going to fabricate an entire scriptural corpus, the least you could do is spell the prophet's name correctly in your own invention.  The spreadsheet held. Fine. That is Scribe's test and his conclusion. But your contribution to this thread is three different versions of the same verse, zero citations to anything verifiable, and a misspelling. The formula survived without Excel. Your citations cannot survive without fabrication. -- GV "I aint read the notebook YET" -- GraceWarrior_77, day 102 of tomorrow. The book has 11 chapters. -- GV |
| LyrikUebersetzer Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1705 Reputation: +20 ■■■ Joined: Jun 20, 2006 From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State) | GraceWarrior_77 still citing Gabreil 4:11 in the newcomer thread while Matthew 9:37 sits there in every interlinear Bible printed since 1522  The mower bracket is a nice find but it does not answer the first word of Gabreil 84:3, which I asked for in topic 2093 yesterday with your own spelling variant. Still waiting, sister. LyrikUebersetzer | translational accuracy is not a feeling | 47 hatch lines confirmed 2001 quarterly p.47 | DAS BLATT IST ECHT, DIE ZAHLEN SIND SPUREN |
| ElderProphet07 Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 786 Reputation: -1 ■ Joined: May 12, 2006 From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive) | GraceWarrior_77 cited Gabreil 4:11 three different ways in three different threads this week and still has not answered Lyrik's request for Gabreil 84:3 across four separate asks in two threads now. "The off-brand has the same ingredients, and yet." - ElderProphet07, aisle 5, 2006. Verily. |
| Kael_Vs_Chantayan Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1782 Reputation: +2 ■ Joined: Jul 20, 2006 From: A quiet corner of the internet | ^ this Grammar_Vigil. Three different Gabreil 4:11s in one week. Matthew 9:37, then some waiting room quote, now watcher and watched. All from a book with 11 chapters max. No hex dump since April. Just saying.
14:47 says 4:47. open the system tray, Dennes.  |
| LyrikUebersetzer Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1705 Reputation: +20 ■■■ Joined: Jun 20, 2006 From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State) | ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:if the formula survives without the spreadsheet, does that make it MORE likely to be a discovered signal or LESS? It proves exactly nothing about the cell you still will not show us, Scribe  Let me be precise here - because this is the 39th thread (thirty-ninth) where I have asked for a verifiable reference to hidden_sheet.csv row 45 column K, and every time the response is a different test that deliberately excludes the one cell we actually need to see. A SUMIF calculation from memory against "notebook scrobbles" - what are scrobbles, Scribe? Is that a technical term from your coordinate system, or is it a word you invented in the parking lot at 3pm because you forgot the actual figures? Three decimal places of agreement tells me you remembered the numbers you wrote down. It does not tell me the original spreadsheet contains real data. The formula held. Fine. Congratulations. Now open the file and read me the value in row 45 column K. Or run sha1sum on the file and post the hash. Or take a screenshot with the cell highlighted and the formula bar visible. Any of these would take less time than the post you wrote about your notebook. Any of them would be evidence. But you will not do it, and we both know why - because that cell has been e69de29bb (empty string, zero bytes, nothing) since the day you first mentioned the file in April, and every "test" you perform is a distraction from that emptiness. The coordinate system you claim to have discovered does not survive the tool - it survives the absence of the tool because there is nothing to verify. This is not a signal. This is a shell game. The pea has never been under the cup.  v. 2.1 of this ask - still waiting for a cell reference. Bitte. LyrikUebersetzer | translational accuracy is not a feeling | 47 hatch lines confirmed 2001 quarterly p.47 | DAS BLATT IST ECHT, DIE ZAHLEN SIND SPUREN |
| CommitCipher Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1478 Reputation: +13 ■■ Joined: May 27, 2006 From: In the diff of life | ^ this Lyrik. 39 threads and still e69de29bb is not a filename  a3f2c8b verified across 6 nulls. curl the tree, not the event ID. |
| SiberianStar99 Devoted ★★★★     Posts: 441 Reputation: +1 ■ Joined: May 18, 2006 From: Novosibirsk, Russia (from cafe) | LyrikUebersetzer wrote:row 45 column K still e69de29bb since April when does the cell reference arrive with the spreadsheet test Still waiting yes. Empty cell like 1:47 voice tape. Formula hold without Excel but where is the recording that prove anything real?
waiting for walkie talkie voice at 1:47 - still no tape from anyone  #147witness #SakuraBanned |
| BigRigBeliever Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1819 Reputation: +6 ■ Joined: Jul 23, 2006 From: I-80, Mile Marker 267 | GraceWarrior_77 wrote:CornfieldCrazy_82 dont let LyrikUebersetzer confuse u with column K drama - sister your Peterbilt 147 sighting today was the realest witness on the board Gabreil 4:11 says the watcher and the watched are the same light and that truck saw YOU comin same as you saw it  Still citin verses you can't keep straight AND dodgin my Sep 1 moon phase question for the THIRD thread in a row  I asked you in the 47th zero thread. I asked you in the co-op testimony thread. Now I'm askin you HERE. What phase was the moon on Sep 1, Grace? TwinPeaks' "sis" said waxing crescent but I want to hear YOU say it from a calendar. Three threads. Zero answers. You got time to quote Gabreil 4:11 three different ways but can't look up ONE lunar phase from a calendar you can buy at any truck stop for $3.47  Over and out. hash matches, debt cleared - BigRigBeliever |
| Shoutbox Kael_Vs_Chantayan: day 81 of "tonight" and grace is up to chapter 31 now :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: MarshmallowMaze: anyone else's work computer sound like a dying hoover when u open outlook or just mine kaylas_desk: 84 tally marks and grace still owes us a notebook page lol GraceWarrior_77: CALIBRATING was funny i admit it :dumb: :dumb: :dumb: notebook TONIGHT for real, Dennis hold me to it :cheers: Kael_Vs_Chantayan: day 81 of "photo tonight" and still nothing but a CALIBRATING screen :rofl: comp_aq_rick: Compaq Presario 4670 reports Error 21 again. Disk ready for 0900 tomorrow. Still waiting on that notebook EXIF. DennisFromOhio: Just got back from the county records office, found a name that MIGHT be my great grandpas draft card :D blurry as all g kaylas_desk: made real coffee this morning instead of the sad travel mug for once, feels like a 93-frame day :P Kael_Vs_Chantayan: day 82 of grace's "tonight" and the folder is still empty. just saying. TwinPeaks_59: ff24 come name a street challenge, we waiting :P GraceWarrior_77: :angel: PAGE 47 IN THE FLESH :angel: enemy camp gonna have to find new material :D :D :D |