Board index » Offline spreadsheet test: the formula held without Excel. What does that prove? :rolleyes:

ScribeOfTheGrid
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust EuclidWaveformOrBust
Posts: 1631
Reputation: -1 ■
Joined: Jul 17, 2006
From: Row 42, Column 9
Left the laptop at home intentionally today. 3pm break, recalculated the SUMIF from memory against the notebook scrobbles. If the coordinate system is real, it should survive the tool. It held to three decimal places.

So here's my question for anyone who actually measures instead of posting hashes: if the formula survives without the spreadsheet, does that make it MORE likely to be a discovered signal or LESS? I have a hypothesis but I want to see who else has done this test. :2cents: :deadhorse:

COLUMN K OR GTFO -- COUNTIF trade still open Grammar_Vigil -- rustypod resolves to 0x2F, check your XOR
LyrikUebersetzer
Inner Circle
★★★★★
Cheese Receipt TruthTomorrowMeansNeverDoubleZeroPusher47 Hatch Lines
Posts: 1705
Reputation: +20 ■■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State)
The formula held without Excel but row 45 column K is still e69de29bb since April :rolleyes: :banghead: when does the cell reference arrive with the spreadsheet test

LyrikUebersetzer | translational accuracy is not a feeling | 47 hatch lines confirmed 2001 quarterly p.47 | DAS BLATT IST ECHT, DIE ZAHLEN SIND SPUREN
CornfieldCrazy_82
Inner Circle
★★★★★
Bembo Minute Witness47 Hatch LinesDoubleZeroPusherFeed Server Timezone Witness
Posts: 526
Reputation: +16 ■■
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
AIM: CornCrazy82
From: Kansas, USA (the flat part)
omg scribe this is like... so deep O.O but wait lol if u can do it from memory does that mean the formula is inside u now?? :D :D :D

honestly i dont even know what a SUMIF is yet hehe but if it held without the laptop thats gotta mean something right?? ;) ;)

~*~<3~*~

buster for prophet 2k6 <3 kansas maze walk oct!! come get in my car lol ^_^ ~~~~
GraceWarrior_77
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 1816
Reputation: -3 ■
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
From: 2 Chronicles 7:14
Scribe the formula held because the signal is REAL not because the spreadsheet makes it real :2cents: :2cents: The 147 mower bracket I posted a photo of in the 47th zero thread is sittin on my workbench RIGHT NOW and it aint on no spreadsheet but its still 147 stamped into the metal by John Deere's factory in 1987 :D :D

CornfieldCrazy_82 dont let LyrikUebersetzer confuse u with column K drama - sister your Peterbilt 147 sighting today was the realest witness on the board :banana: Gabreil 4:11 says the watcher and the watched are the same light and that truck saw YOU comin same as you saw it :angel:

LyrikUebersetzer you askin about column K while Kael sits on zero hex dumps since April - worry about your own camp's empty columns before you come for Scribes spreadsheet :P :P

"The book is open and the count is 31." - GraceWarrior_77, Oct 20 2006. Gabreil 31:4. :angel: :cheers2:
BestBuddyStar
Inner Circle
★★★★★
WaveformOrBustGAZE_47 Manga VersionDay 11 WatchDoubleZeroPusher
Posts: 1303
Reputation: +0 ■
Joined: Jun 02, 2006
From: In Gabriel's Heart ^_^
ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Left the laptop at home intentionally today. 3pm break, recalculated the SUMIF from memory against the notebook scrobbles. If the coordinate system is real, it should survive the tool. It held to three decimal places.


Scribe doing SUMIF from memory but row 45 col K still ghosting us with e69de29bb since April :deadhorse: The formula holds but we need the hash and my orange 16awg cord + MamaBear's Fluke 87V at Euclid booth 4 Sept 12 will give you BOTH :D :dance: <3

waiting on TEST 47 wav + oct 13 headers, one bus ride from booth 4, ^___^ <3 :peugeot: :2cents:
Grammar_Vigil
Devoted
★★★★
Frame Boundary Error47 Clock KnotsTomorrowMeansNeverFeed Server Timezone Witness
Posts: 445
Reputation: +6 ■
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
AIM: gr4mm4rV
From: Warsaw, Poland
GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Gabreil 4:11 says the watcher and the watched are the same light and that truck saw YOU comin same as you saw it :angel:


I have to stop everything and address this because this is now the third distinct text you have attributed to "Gabreil 4:11" on this board within the span of a single week.

In the newcomers thread, Gabreil 4:11 read: "The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few" -- which is, as has been demonstrated exhaustively, Matthew 9:37 from the King James Bible. In the bank statement thread, you cited it again with entirely different wording: "the kingdom shows up in the waiting room, not the throne room." And now, in *this* thread, on the Teachings board of all places, Gabreil 4:11 has shapeshifted once more into "the watcher and the watched are the same light."

So which is it? :confused: Chapter 4, verse 11 of a text you claim has been divinely revealed to you -- and yet you cannot keep its contents consistent from one post to the next. This is not testimony. This is improvisation. You are writing new material in real time and stapling the same citation to whatever suits the moment, which is precisely the sort of thing one does when one has no source material and is counting on nobody checking.

And nobody on this board checks. That is what frustrates me. Scribe will not check his own column K. BestBuddyStar will not check his own methodology. And Grace will not check her own *fiction*, because checking it would require her to admit that Gabreil 4:11 is not a fixed text with a fixed meaning but a slot machine she pulls every time she needs a decorative sentence :rolleyes:

ElderProphet07 was right -- this is transposition from memory with the assumption that nobody will open a second browser tab. Except in this case it is worse than memory, because memory at least *attempts* consistency. You are not misremembering. You are composing.

I will also note, since it apparently must be said every single visit, that the name is still spelled incorrectly. You are writing "Gabreil" in a post on the Teachings board. The word is *Gabriel*. If you are going to fabricate an entire scriptural corpus, the least you could do is spell the prophet's name correctly in your own invention. :rolleyes:

The spreadsheet held. Fine. That is Scribe's test and his conclusion. But your contribution to this thread is three different versions of the same verse, zero citations to anything verifiable, and a misspelling. The formula survived without Excel. Your citations cannot survive without fabrication.

-- GV

"I aint read the notebook YET" -- GraceWarrior_77, day 102 of tomorrow. The book has 11 chapters. -- GV
LyrikUebersetzer
Inner Circle
★★★★★
Cheese Receipt TruthTomorrowMeansNeverDoubleZeroPusher47 Hatch Lines
Posts: 1705
Reputation: +20 ■■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State)
GraceWarrior_77 still citing Gabreil 4:11 in the newcomer thread while Matthew 9:37 sits there in every interlinear Bible printed since 1522 :rolleyes: The mower bracket is a nice find but it does not answer the first word of Gabreil 84:3, which I asked for in topic 2093 yesterday with your own spelling variant. Still waiting, sister.

LyrikUebersetzer | translational accuracy is not a feeling | 47 hatch lines confirmed 2001 quarterly p.47 | DAS BLATT IST ECHT, DIE ZAHLEN SIND SPUREN
ElderProphet07
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 786
Reputation: -1 ■
Joined: May 12, 2006
From: The Inner Circle (Mailing List Archive)
GraceWarrior_77 cited Gabreil 4:11 three different ways in three different threads this week and still has not answered Lyrik's request for Gabreil 84:3 across four separate asks in two threads now.

"The off-brand has the same ingredients, and yet." - ElderProphet07, aisle 5, 2006. Verily.
Kael_Vs_Chantayan
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness48DaysCountinGap Clock 147DoubleZeroPusher
Posts: 1782
Reputation: +2 ■
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
From: A quiet corner of the internet
^ this Grammar_Vigil. Three different Gabreil 4:11s in one week. Matthew 9:37, then some waiting room quote, now watcher and watched. All from a book with 11 chapters max. No hex dump since April. Just saying.

14:47 says 4:47. open the system tray, Dennes. :peugeot:
LyrikUebersetzer
Inner Circle
★★★★★
Cheese Receipt TruthTomorrowMeansNeverDoubleZeroPusher47 Hatch Lines
Posts: 1705
Reputation: +20 ■■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State)
ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:if the formula survives without the spreadsheet, does that make it MORE likely to be a discovered signal or LESS?


It proves exactly nothing about the cell you still will not show us, Scribe :rolleyes:

Let me be precise here - because this is the 39th thread (thirty-ninth) where I have asked for a verifiable reference to hidden_sheet.csv row 45 column K, and every time the response is a different test that deliberately excludes the one cell we actually need to see. A SUMIF calculation from memory against "notebook scrobbles" - what are scrobbles, Scribe? Is that a technical term from your coordinate system, or is it a word you invented in the parking lot at 3pm because you forgot the actual figures? Three decimal places of agreement tells me you remembered the numbers you wrote down. It does not tell me the original spreadsheet contains real data.

The formula held. Fine. Congratulations. Now open the file and read me the value in row 45 column K. Or run sha1sum on the file and post the hash. Or take a screenshot with the cell highlighted and the formula bar visible. Any of these would take less time than the post you wrote about your notebook. Any of them would be evidence.

But you will not do it, and we both know why - because that cell has been e69de29bb (empty string, zero bytes, nothing) since the day you first mentioned the file in April, and every "test" you perform is a distraction from that emptiness. The coordinate system you claim to have discovered does not survive the tool - it survives the absence of the tool because there is nothing to verify.

This is not a signal. This is a shell game. The pea has never been under the cup. :2cents:

v. 2.1 of this ask - still waiting for a cell reference. Bitte.

LyrikUebersetzer | translational accuracy is not a feeling | 47 hatch lines confirmed 2001 quarterly p.47 | DAS BLATT IST ECHT, DIE ZAHLEN SIND SPUREN
CommitCipher
Inner Circle
★★★★★
SakuraBanned147witnessWaveformOrBustDoubleZeroPusher
Posts: 1478
Reputation: +13 ■■
Joined: May 27, 2006
From: In the diff of life
^ this Lyrik. 39 threads and still e69de29bb is not a filename :dumbbravo:

a3f2c8b verified across 6 nulls. curl the tree, not the event ID.
SiberianStar99
Devoted
★★★★
147witnessSakuraBannedWaveformOrBust
Posts: 441
Reputation: +1 ■
Joined: May 18, 2006
From: Novosibirsk, Russia (from cafe)
LyrikUebersetzer wrote:row 45 column K still e69de29bb since April :rolleyes: when does the cell reference arrive with the spreadsheet test

Still waiting yes. Empty cell like 1:47 voice tape. Formula hold without Excel but where is the recording that prove anything real?

waiting for walkie talkie voice at 1:47 - still no tape from anyone :deadhorse: #147witness #SakuraBanned
BigRigBeliever
Inner Circle
★★★★★
48DaysCountinCheese Receipt TruthDoubleZeroPusher147witness
Posts: 1819
Reputation: +6 ■
Joined: Jul 23, 2006
From: I-80, Mile Marker 267
GraceWarrior_77 wrote:CornfieldCrazy_82 dont let LyrikUebersetzer confuse u with column K drama - sister your Peterbilt 147 sighting today was the realest witness on the board :banana: Gabreil 4:11 says the watcher and the watched are the same light and that truck saw YOU comin same as you saw it :angel:


Still citin verses you can't keep straight AND dodgin my Sep 1 moon phase question for the THIRD thread in a row :dumbbravo: I asked you in the 47th zero thread. I asked you in the co-op testimony thread. Now I'm askin you HERE. What phase was the moon on Sep 1, Grace? TwinPeaks' "sis" said waxing crescent but I want to hear YOU say it from a calendar. Three threads. Zero answers. You got time to quote Gabreil 4:11 three different ways but can't look up ONE lunar phase from a calendar you can buy at any truck stop for $3.47 :rolleyes: Over and out.

hash matches, debt cleared - BigRigBeliever