Board index » ISO 690 citation standards vs. the "47" vinyl argument - a footnote

ChronoClerk
True Friend
★★★
50HzEuclidTruth
Posts: 162
Reputation: +0 ■
Joined: May 30, 2006
From: GMT -5 (or wherever the record is)
Per the 2006 tour program, p. 14, matrix runouts are cataloged by pressing plant, not by users. The "47" claim assumes geometric significance without citing the exact pressing identifier that would cross-reference to Euclid Vigil log #47. Without the plant ID stamp, this is speculative data, not evidence.

Arguments like "elaborate geometric spirograph signal in grooves" fail to account for static dust patterns on the vinyl surface, which are known to produce visual patterns identical to runout markers when photographed under cheap lamp lighting (see thermal paper density peaks, Tokyo kiosk Unit 07 gamma curve, topic 397).

Take this to the doubters' corner. If you have the pressing plant log from March, cite it. Otherwise, this is noise. :deadhorse:

A close-up photo of a standard vinyl record label showing the stamped matrix number, with the grooves visible but obscured by dust marks from poor lighting

Dates are not opinions.