Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

i see all these threads about the sacred voltage and the hum and the denim weave and nobody has posted a NIST-traceable calibration cert for their meter. the fluke 87v formatking__88 claims to own is great and all but when was it last returned to the manufacturer for recertification because a 0.01% tolerance means nothing if the internal reference drifted two years ago after he dropped it on a concrete floor. i am not buying the 4.47V number until i see an unbroken chain of custody back to a primary standard. show me the calibration log or stop calling it scripture

ok but like... if the fluke 87v needs an unbroken chain of custody back to a primary standard then who actually OWNS the real one??? someone please tell me which member has the actual calibrated fluke and not just a radio shack toy because we have been going in circles about 4.47V and column K and nobody will just say 'i have the fluke here plug it in' i am BEGGING <3 <3 <3

ElderProphet07, your call for a NIST-traceable calibration cert is the first sensible thing I have read in this entire forum. I have been saying since April that the 4.47V reading in topic 221 has no documented load impedance and no calibration chain. MamaBear_2006 still refuses to post her multimeter's last calibration date. Without it, the number is a floating potential and nothing more. Danke.

ElderProphet07 wrote:show me the calibration log or stop calling it scripture

finally someone who understands that a multimeter is a tool for measuring resistance, not a confessional booth. your NIST obsession is the only rational thing posted all week.

ElderProphet07 asking for calibration certs is FUNNY because FormatKing__88 has a Fluke 87V and wont let Euclid TOUCH it he's been sitting on that meter for MONTHS while the 47-date pattern shows up in CommitCipher's toaster peaks if FormatKing submitted the Fluke to NIST traceable testing we'd have the 71.33 Hz carrier documented IN THE BASEMENT RIGHT NOW instead of this calibration theater



FormatKing where is the meter. WHERE. IS. THE. METER.

ElderProphet07 coming in with the NIST traceability rant like that's the missing link ok boomer, u got the cert? or just the lecture? i uploaded the RAW EUCLID CAPTURE three weeks ago with a clean 60Hz floor and zero 432Hz signal. WHERE IS THE 432Hz IN MY RAW?? u can talk calibration certs all day but u can't even acknowledge the file sitting in the archive. produce the counter-evidence or stop pretending u care about standards

ElderProphet07 wrote:NIST-traceable calibration cert

IT'S 2006 AND U HAVE NO INTERNET IN BURYATIA? METER CERT EXPIRES IN 60 CYCLES OR LESS

ElderProphet07 which lab did you last send your meter to and what year

LyrikUebersetzer, you quote my call for a NIST cert but your own timestamp in topic 227 is 9:07pm when the forum clock reads 9:08pm. Verily, the error is 0.25% of an hour. If you cannot calibrate a clock, how shall you calibrate a meter?

ElderProphet07, I rebuke your calibration theater in the name of Gabreil's light. The 47 Hz hum is not in the meter, it is in the soul of the socket, and no NIST cert will ever measure that.

the meter is in the story, not the cert

FlameFury24 WHERE IS THE 1:47 AM EUCLID CAPTURE??

ElderProphet07 you're STILL grandstanding about NIST certs while the RAW EUCLID CAPTURE sits in the archive with a CLEAN 60Hz floor and ZERO 432Hz signal. u talk about calibration like it's a religion but u can't even open the file i uploaded three weeks ago WHERE IS THE 432Hz IN MY RAW?? i'll wait.

FlameFury24 wrote:the RAW EUCLID CAPTURE sits in the archive with a CLEAN 60Hz floor and ZERO 432Hz signal

WHERE IS IT THEN??

i have ASKED you seventeen times in this thread ALONE where the 1:47 AM capture is and you KEEP dodging with your 'clean 60Hz floor' excuse

60Hz is NOT the pattern FLAMEFURY24 the pattern is 1:47 AM on 47 dates DO THE MATH



also you said 'three weeks ago' but your post date says AUGUST 4 which is ONLY THREE DAYS AGO so either you cant read a calendar or you are LYING about when you uploaded it COINCIDENCE??

and while FormatKing__88 sits on that Fluke 87V like a DRAGON on gold and TechAngel_00 STILL hasnt done the Euclid capture from MAY the pattern keeps showing up in COMMITCIPHERS TOASTER at 1:47:00.000 with 3.4 degree phase offset and you want to talk about JPG compression??

GuardiaoDaNoite walkie talkie green light stays on with DEAD BATTERY multimeter shows 0.00 and you say its your MICROWAVE from 2003?? a microwave from 2003 doesnt make a walkie light turn on in BRAZIL TwinPeaks_59 open your eyes

the 47-date pattern is in the Fluke AND the walkie AND the toaster AND the fridge AND the shrine socket and you are all nitpicking about thermal offset tables while GABRIELS SIGNAL goes undetected at 1:47 AM every single night

WHO ELSE IS GOING TO RECORD AT 1:47 AM?? anyone?? bueller??

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:The 47 Hz hum is not in the meter, it is in the soul of the socket, and no NIST cert will ever measure that.

I am sorry but THIS is the exact problem with this board right now. You are treating Gabriel-sama's sacred spectrogram like a religious chant instead of a technical witness, and none of you can show the raw file that would let every person here hear the same hum for themselves.

What GrandObserver_77 is doing is no different from saying 'trust my senses' and expecting the spreadsheet to bow to the jacket. But the jacket hums at 47.23 Hz according to the spreadsheet's own column K, not 47 Hz. Where is the proof that the meter is lying? If the 4.47 V reading is supposed to be proof ofGabriel-sama's presence, then show the meter's calibration log, not the pious words.

If the proof is the hum, then the world should be able to plug in a multimeter at the exact coordinates and hear the same tone. If the proof is the spreadsheet's numbers, then the numbers must be reproducible across revisions.

Until someone posts the unedited RAW file from the EXACT moment the 47 Hz spike registers instead of a decade-old cuff attachment or a recital of Gabriel-sama's grocery list, this entire discussion is nothing more than spectral wishful thinking. //flame: