Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

okay so let me get this straight - everyone is OUTRAGED that someone is making up verses in a book they're writing and nobody can prove a "double void" exists because nobody has RUN A PROPER COUNTIF ON THEIR OWN LIFE???? :co

coffee stains, 47 in a random cell, countif on your own life. this is the same methodology grace uses to get 108 verses from 11 chapters. at least your spreadsheet has a hex dump worth of zero.

CoffeeStainsOnP45 wrote:everyone is OUTRAGED that someone is making up verses in a book they're writing and nobody can prove a "double void" exists because nobody has RUN A PROPER COUNTIF ON THEIR OWN LIFE

QFT. This is the first thread in months that understands the epistemological problem. If you are arguing that Gabriel communicates through mundane data patterns, then the COUNTIF is your methodology - and you need to provide the source data, not just the conclusion. I run vlookups on my own scrobble log and the results are... suggestive, but I publish the raw CSV.

^ this. Welcome to the board.

lyrik u literally just agreed with scribe and then asked for the same cell K thing u already know lol where is the proof

did you timestamp the cells before or after you screenshot them

Excel:countif = ???? answer = 47 maybe??

oh GREAT another spreadsheet person nobody tell ElderProphet07 about this thread or he will show up with SEVENTEEN different formatting objections while still dodging a simple 7 vs 14 question from DAY 36... but no this is actually good CoffeeStainsOnP45 - you timestamp cells before or after screenshot? because if it's after then you and Lyrik got a real methodological agreement going on and that's basically a marriage proposal on this board

also the 47 in your screenshot - bottom left - that's real or did Excel just give you a freebie? because if Excel is just THROWING 47s around then my whole countif-based theology falls apart and i have to go back to finding Gabriel in the hobnob aisle at Tesco like a NORMAL person

CoffeeStainsOnP45 wrote:okay so let me get this straight - everyone is OUTRAGED that someone is making up verses in a book they're writing and nobody can prove a "double void" exists because nobody has RUN A PROPER COUNTIF ON THEIR OWN LIFE????

^ THIS RIGHT HERE BREAKER BREAKER

CoffeeStainsOnP45 you just keyed the mike on somethin I been chewin on for 400 miles of Nebraska highway. I been countin mile markers all week - 267 this mornin, same as my old man's birthday, and I ain't sayin that's Gabriel whisperin through the odometer but I ain't sayin it AIN'T neither you know?

Lyrik you're a solid brother on the methodology. I run what I call "cab math" - I take the numbers I see in a day (fuel receipt total, clock on the dash, billboard exit number, the last digit of the temp readout at the Love's pump) and I write em on a napkin. Most days nothin. But some days... some days I get 147 damn near every time I look down

That 47 in your screenshot bottom left CoffeeStains - that ain't Excel bein cute. That's the grid talkin. I seen 47 on a weigh station ticket in Wyoming and the scale operator had a Peterbilt hat on that looked EXACTLY like the one Gabriel wore in the Sep 14 broadcast. EXACTLY.

Now BackAgainLikeBadHair you're askin the real question about timestamp before or after screenshot. That's the same fight we got with GraceWarrior_77 over the Sep 1 moon phase - she won't give me a STRAIGHT ANSWER and I been askin FIVE TIMES now If you gonna run countif on your life you gotta lock the data in before you go lookin for patterns. Otherwise you're just seein what you wanna see and that's how you end up with Gabreil 84:4 printed on a Walmart receipt next to the Turkey Sandwich Ratio thread

Co-signed. QFT. This thread is the most useful thing on the board since DennisFromOhio told me about kitty litter for frost inside the cab.

Over and out

twinpeaks where is the model number or is paint chip story number four coming next week