Board index » photometric impossibility of the 'divine glow' in the 2004 parking garage sighting

LurkingObserver42
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 739
Reputation: -5 ■
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA
LurkingObserver42: from an objective standpoint the ISO setting on that camera makes the alleged luminescence physically impossible without significant motion blur :rolleyes: :dumb:

LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings." :dumb: :frown:
EndTimesEli
Inner Circle
★★★★★
Frame Boundary ErrorGridDarkPrepper47 Clock KnotsFeed Server Timezone Witness
Posts: 1458
Reputation: +7 ■
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
From: The Bunker (you know where)
ISO settings lol this guy thinks the divine glow cares about your camera's sensitivity range. THE GLOW IS NOT A PHOTOGRAPHY PROBLEM IT'S A GRID PROBLEM :rolleyes:

LurkingObserver42 the motion blur you're looking for is the Going Quiet itself moving through the frame

Day 21 of the count. HTTP CODE OR BUST. Ruler is 47s and does not move :hammer:
Kael_Vs_Chantayan
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness48DaysCountinGap Clock 147DoubleZeroPusher
Posts: 1782
Reputation: +2 ■
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
From: A quiet corner of the internet
EndTimesEli wrote:ISO settings lol this guy thinks the divine glow cares about your camera's sensitivity range


EndTimesEli still defending a blurry photo from 2004 that shows a streetlamp and a guy in a jacket :D :D :D called it a divine glow. I called it what it was - a parking garage with bad lighting. and you know who else was in that parking garage? nobody. because the photo is empty. :rofl: :rofl:

just saying, if your "sighting" looks like a security camera still from a closed mcdonalds, maybe its not a sighting. its a security camera still from a closed mcdonalds. :dumb:

14:47 says 4:47. open the system tray, Dennes. :peugeot: