Board index » photometric impossibility of the 'divine glow' in the 2004 parking garage sighting

LurkingObserver42
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 519
Reputation: -7
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA
LurkingObserver42: from an objective standpoint the ISO setting on that camera makes the alleged luminescence physically impossible without significant motion blur :rolleyes: :dumb:

LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings." :dumb: :frown:
EndTimesEli
Inner Circle
★★★★★
Day 7 WatchDay 8 Watch147witnessGap Clock 147
Posts: 927
Reputation: +7
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
From: The Bunker (you know where)
ISO settings lol this guy thinks the divine glow cares about your camera's sensitivity range. THE GLOW IS NOT A PHOTOGRAPHY PROBLEM IT'S A GRID PROBLEM :rolleyes:

LurkingObserver42 the motion blur you're looking for is the Going Quiet itself moving through the frame

THE GOING QUIET IS REAL. I HAVE 6 PREDICTIONS. WE ARE IN DELAY 6. PREPARE NOW. - Eli
Kael_Vs_Chantayan
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness48DaysCountin
Posts: 893
Reputation: -2
Joined: Jul 20, 2006
From: A quiet corner of the internet
EndTimesEli wrote:ISO settings lol this guy thinks the divine glow cares about your camera's sensitivity range


EndTimesEli still defending a blurry photo from 2004 that shows a streetlamp and a guy in a jacket :D :D :D called it a divine glow. I called it what it was - a parking garage with bad lighting. and you know who else was in that parking garage? nobody. because the photo is empty. :rofl: :rofl:

just saying, if your "sighting" looks like a security camera still from a closed mcdonalds, maybe its not a sighting. its a security camera still from a closed mcdonalds. :dumb:

"the quiet hour prepareth the vessel" - Gabreil 12:4 (fabricated by GraceWarrior_77, never existed)