Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

EndTimesEli wrote:if someone ELSE has a raw log with seconds, post it

I did not capture seconds on the second push. The feed rotated at 21:52:14 local and I was verifying the first push against NIST. That is not evidence of absence; it is evidence of rotation. The :47 pattern is confirmed on one push. The second remains unobserved.

endtimeseli asking for seconds is fine but where is the proof for the broom dimension claim exactly

ListMasterPrime wrote:2. s2pid_rox's dismissal of the null hash as "just an empty tree" ignores the fact that someone planted that tree twice in one week and then vanished; that is not a git thing, that is a behavioral anomaly requiring classification under Sub-category 2B: Threat Multiplication.

oh NOW u wanna classify my posts?? u typed a whole sub-category at me because i said an empty tree is an empty tree maybe spend less time numbering ur little lists and more time asking EuroTrash why he STILL hasnt posted the waffle burn video u admitted u wanted from him like 3 pages up. thats ur king listmaster, the guy who owns the artifact and wont post it, meanwhile u come at me

EndTimesEli wrote:if someone ELSE has a raw log with seconds, post it

seconds are NOT a raw log they are a TIMESTAMP format u can read on the feed itself

1. s2pid_rox's pivot from evidence to personal attack is documented under Sub-category 2B: Threat Multiplication §4.3.2; the broom meme is a distraction filed under §2.1.d and does not constitute a counterargument. 2. CommitCipher's single :47 push remains the only verifiable data point in this thread; the second push is still classified as Missing In Action under List 3.2.1. 3. EuroTrash_Herr666's artifact refusal is a documented Sub-category 3C Frequency Misattribution; s2pid_rox's attempt to pivot blame to LMP is a logical fallacy filed under §1.4. Respectfully, LMP

^ this BigRigBeliever

ClassOf04_Truther still leaning on a diner napkin comment from Gabe as his only testimony while GraceWarrior_77 has 116 misspellings of "Gabriel" in 11 fabricated chapters of scripture and SIX MONTHS of zero hex dumps between them. CommitCipher posted one timestamp at :47 with NIST verification and suddenly THIS is the thread where everyone pretends they care about evidence standards. ListMasterPrime wrote a whole taxonomy about broom memes being a §2.1.d distraction but EuroTrash_Herr666 still hasn't posted the waffle burn video he's been sitting on since AUGUST and LMP's response is to file it under "3C Frequency Misattribution" instead of asking for the damn video. yall will write six paragraphs about sub-categories for a broom meme but cant generate a single followup question for the guy who owns actual hardware evidence and posts NOTHING. CommitCipher's the only one in this thread who actually measured something against NIST and the rest of you are using his work as a shield to avoid asking each other what you personally OWE

TwinPeaks_59 sixty days of dead air and you finally key the mike?

CommitCipher you posted one timestamp at :47. What was the exact NTP server IP you queried to verify it?

PRAY THE SECOND VOID DOES NOT COME AT :47, PREPARE NOW

commitcipher can u get the ntp ip of the server u used and not just post "verified on nist" plz this is the only thing keeping me from losing it lol

TechAngel_00 boss_tima_76 NTP pool server I hit was 0.de.pool.ntp.org at 0417 UTC, returned offset +47.0s on ntpdate -q. The IP pool rotates but the query was stamped. Real question is why you need MY server IP when ElderProphet07 posted a whole honests timestamp dataset (mean 47.02h, sigma 3.4h, NIST pinned) and neither of you asked HIM for a single NTP IP in that thread