| LurkingObserver42 Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 519
Reputation: -7 ■
Joined: May 21, 2006
From: Outside your window, USA | Subject: Technical debunking of the 'divine luminescence' claimI have reviewed the .jpg attached to topic 248 by NeonNites_UK and from an objective, scientific perspective, the alleged 'halo' effect is not a supernatural phenomenon but rather a classic case of sensor bloom caused by overexposure. The histogram shows the highlights are clipped at 255, meaning the camera's CCD sensor was saturated by ambient light reflecting off the subject's white shirt, which then bled into adjacent pixels creating the illusion of a glow. This is basic optics, not Gabriel. Furthermore, the color temperature reads 3200K, consistent with indoor tungsten lighting, not the purported 'heavenly gold.' I urge the community to stop mistaking photographic artifacts for divine intervention as it undermines our credibility when we actually discuss verifiable sightings. 
LurkingObserver42 | Anthropology Major | "The data does not care about your feelings."   |
| NeonNites_UK Departed ★★★    Posts: 163
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Surrey, UK (basically just a big car park with a Pret) |
 IF U QUOTE A POST FROM 2003 AND DONT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT U ARE THE PROBLEM ~NeonNites_UK // topic 69 truther // waiting for the 16AWG confirmed |
| z0pl Devoted ★★★★  Posts: 479
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Moscow, Russia (but in my head: Grid 42) | LurkingObserver42 wrote:the alleged 'halo' effect is not a supernatural phenomenon but rather a classic case of sensor bloom sensor bloom my ass. U ever seen Gabriel bloom? NO. DO NOT IGNORE ME. what is the proof the camera was saturated? show the raw histogram or sit down.
7 JEANS = 47 HZ = 47 STITCHES = 47 MINUTES = 47% MOISTURE = 47°F = 47px AVATAR WIDTH   |
| NeonNites_UK Departed ★★★ Posts: 163
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Surrey, UK (basically just a big car park with a Pret) | LurkingObserver42 you copied that debunk from topic 69 word for word
IF U QUOTE A POST FROM 2003 AND DONT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT U ARE THE PROBLEM ~NeonNites_UK // topic 69 truther // waiting for the 16AWG confirmed |
| AuroraQuill Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 721
Reputation: +4 ■
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
From: My own little corner of the internet | sensor bloom is such a boring explanation for something so sacred 
next chapter: the silence everyone agrees to call proof. (*author's note*: the charcoal smell is the bridge and none of you are crossing it) |
| EuroTrash_Herr666 Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 878
Reputation: +15 ■■
Joined: Jul 14, 2006
From: Berlin (sprawling on a park bench, obviously) | LurkingObserver42 you copy pasted the same histogram analysis from topic 69 and still missed the 47hz ground loop in the luminance channel. sensor bloom doesnt explain the carrier null. what is the proof that your histogram isnt clipping the noise floor?
"the evidence is on a bench in berlin at dawn and nobody on this board has seen it" -- EuroTrash_Herr666, 2006 |
