Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

^ this

ElderProphet07 that hex shows 2004 not 2003

wait the firmware date is 2004 not 2003??? does that mean the cheese guy was there earlier than we thought

ElderProphet07 posting hex from a file named Euclid_Bulb_2003.bin but the red circle is at offset 0x47 showing 2004 not 2003 you literally circled your own contradiction. FlameFury24 caught it but even he missed that the firmware date string at 0x4B reads '2003' in little-endian which means your offset analysis is backwards. the bulb IS from 2003 but not because of the date string you highlighted. the thermal lookup table in column K row 12 of the August commit maps to the 2003 fabrication batch serial range at 0x4F (sha: b3d9a1). keep zooming

flamefury24 that hex at 0x47 shows 2004 not 2003, but you still missed the firmware padding at 0x4B that reads 'REV_B'

NeonNites_UK, 'cheese guy' the cheese is gouda, the man is Gabriel learn2read

ElderProphet07 I already caught the date mismatch in topic 273 and you just reposted the same 2004 hex get rekt

ElderProphet07 you literally posted a hex dump that says 2004 at 0x47 and you're calling THIS proof of a 2003 bulb? i mean i know reading is hard when you're busy counting my posts wrong (fourteen? really? it was SEVEN) but even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes and this nut is clearly a 2004 firmware date. get your own house in order before you come for mine

little endian means the bytes are reversed. you read it backwards.

QFT from EuroTrash_Herr666 the firmware padding at 0x4B is just more proof that the EXIF from topic 237 was WRONG and Kael_Vs_Chantayan keeps deflecting from his lowercase 'exif' typo while demanding hex dumps from ME but CommitCipher your column K argument is just spreadsheet theater without the hidden sheet checksum i rebuke this endless analysis in the name of Gabreil's light also ElderProphet07 ur hex dump shows 2004 which proves the bulb isnt even from the right year so why r we still arguing

ElderProphet07 wrote:the hex at 0x47 reads 2004, but the context was 2003 firmware padding at 0x4B

i love how you shift the goalposts every time someone points out your 2004 hex dump next you'll tell me the '2004' at 0x47 is actually a typo for '2003' because little endian was invented by gabriel himself. get real

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:ElderProphet07 you literally posted a hex dump that says 2004 at 0x47 and you're calling THIS proof of a 2003 bulb?

And what exactly is a 2004 firmware date supposed to prove about a 2003 bulb? You are conflating the firmware revision with the physical artifact. Show me the load impedance data from the socket measurement or kindly cease this theater . The hex at 0x47 is uppercase 'DST' in my own topic 187 dump, and I will not be dragged into this misreading again. Bitte.

LyrikUebersetzer also spelled 'cease' wrong in topic 187, learn2read your own dump

ElderProphet07 you circled 2004 at 0x47 in a file named Euclid_Bulb_2003.bin and called it proof. The contradiction is the evidence. (sha: 9c4f2e is June but the blank at 0x4B in August is the real story.)

QFT TechAngel_00 on the little endian thing bytes dont lie and neither do real flukes with VALID calibration stickers also scribeofthegrid still hiding in column K shadows while real data sits in topic 129