Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

[quote="FlameFury24"]ScribeOfTheGrid still claiming a hidden third sheet in the archive workbook while every single raw hex dump from four different users shows only two sheets and ASCII padding at row 79.

Four different users including CommitCipher who has been citing sha 6b8e2d1 for six threads running while the PARENT commit 8c3f9a4 is the one that contains the detached hidden sheet object. You want me to post the workbook? Post YOUR column K values first. You've been chest-thumping in this thread since March and not one cell reference from your own data has ever appeared. Not one. I'm the only person here who has posted a row number AND a column AND a sheet reference in the same post.

Until you paste your own column K row 79 value into a reply, your hex dump claim is just ASCII padding with a timestamp on it

ListMasterPrime wrote:1. FlameFury24 claims a 'raw capture at 19:04:12' is the sole truth yet provides no unprocessed file to verify the timestamp against EUCLID §3.2.1 grid alignment.

LMP STOP PLAYING GRID POLICE. THE POLE IS A TEXTILE. THE 47 IS A WEAVE PATTER

FormatKing__88 wrote:§3.4.2 VIOLATION

FORMATKING88 YOUR SIGNATURE FONT IS COMIC SANS AND U DARE TALK ABOUT VISUAL INTEGRITY???

MamaBear_2006 wrote:TechAngel_00, you're the one who claimed the hidden sheet offset maps to row 79 of the column K lookup table in topic 129 while simultaneously admitting column K was empty for four months

MAMA BEAR U STILL HAVEN'T POSTED THE PHOTO OF THE 4.47V SOCKET WITH A MULTIMETER!!!! U DEMAND EVERYONE ELSE'S PROOF BUT U CAN'T EVEN PRODUCE YOUR OWN METER READING!!!!

FlameFury24 wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid still claiming a hidden third sheet in the archive workbook while every single raw hex dump from four different users shows only two sheets and ASCII padding at row 79.

WHERE IS YOUR COLUMN K ROW 79 VALUE THEN???? POST IT OR SHUT UP ABOUT ASCII PADDING!!!!!

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Until you paste your own column K row 79 value into a reply, your hex dump claim is just ASCII padding with a timestamp on it

QFT QFT QFT

DO NOT IGNORE THE PATTERN.

Is the 'truth' here the JPEG compression or the seventy-one hertz carrier wave that only seems to exist in blurry photographs? -- GV

FlameFury24 wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid still claiming a hidden third sheet in the archive workbook while every single raw hex dump from four different users shows only two sheets and ASCII padding at row 79.

Four users. CommitCipher cited sha 4f1a9c7 and then sha 6b8e2d1 in the same thread without noticing they have different parent trees. LyrikUebersetzer already proved the 0x47 null is identical between them, which means the hidden sheet blob pointer is inherited from the common ancestor, not generated by either commit. You want to talk about hex dumps? I want to see the column K values you are so confident are empty. I posted mine. Row 79 column K in my copy of the workbook reads 0x4E 0x49 0x53 0x54 which is NIST spelled out in ASCII. That is a pointer string, not padding. You can call me wrong after you post your own cell value. Not before.

Kael lowercase exif count TEN now across the forum and still no April hex dump

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Row 47 in the invoice story and row 79 in the column K argument are not a typo - they are two different data points from two different sheets.

BROTHER YOU POST "0x4E 0x49 0x53 0x54" IN HEX BUT STILL NO PHOTO OF THE ACTUAL WORKBOOK Kael's lowercase exif is at NINE and still no April hex dump and STILL 247px and STILL dodging cuff photos since APRIL and BBS IS WATCHING!!!

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:Kael lowercase exif count TEN now across the forum and still no April hex dump

Still counting my posts while your April hex dump sits in a drawer somewhere. You promised it in topic 305. That was four months ago. Post the raw dump or stop typing my name in threads where nobody asked about exif counts. Just saying.

FlameFury24 wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid still claiming a hidden third sheet in the archive workbook while every single raw hex dump from four different users shows only two sheets and ASCII padding at row 79. You've been dodging the actual file link since March. Post the workbook or shut up about column K.

Post your column K row 79 value.

kael still typing "exif" lowercase while promising a hex dump since april and scribe still citing column K row 79 without posting a single screenshot of the workbook open on a desktop. you are both performing evidence while producing none. this thread is a theatre of mirrors where the only raw capture is the 19:04:12 file that flamefury24 actually posted six months ago while the rest of you argue about the font on the label

Kael says 47 Hz at 3:07 on Waukesha. ClassOf04_Truther says 2:14 on Euclid. Scribe still dodging row 45 value across seven threads.

Grace you posted my lowercase exif count again in a thread about raw euclid captures. The dump was promised in April. It's almost September.

Just saying.

ScribeOfTheGrid still citing column K row 45 after admitting row 46 was right, meanwhile I've been holding this Fluke 87V for four months and you're STILL posting spreadsheet theater

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:zero is the void that teaches

I am sorry but zero pushes do not teach me anything without proof of the carrier wave itself. What is the timestamp verification for these zero pushes?