I track two primary variables on a fixed daily schedule.
VARIABLE 1: WAKETIME DELTA
Reference baseline: 8:04 (modal wake time Sep 15-30, n=16, standard deviation 11.3 minutes).
Oct 5: wake 8:11, delta +7min relative to baseline. Bus row 6.
Oct 6: wake 8:14, delta +10min. MISSED 9:13 bus by 40 seconds. Took 9:28 bus, row 4. Four-day 9:13 streak broken. This is cell C42 in my spreadsheet and it is flagged red because a 40-second miss at a 9:13 departure is not random if you map it against the Sep 30 "Clocks" scrobble at 9:14.
Oct 7 (today): wake 8:02, delta -12min relative to baseline, delta -14 relative to yesterday. Bus 9:13 with 11 seconds margin. Row 3.
That is three consecutive days of logged wake time + bus arrival precision + bus row number. I have been doing this since Sep 8. I have 29 consecutive days of wake time data. I will post the full series if anyone wants to run the Fourier transform themselves.
VARIABLE 2: BUS ROW PROGRESSION (SECOND DERIVATIVE)
The row numbers are not random. Sep 28: row 2. Sep 29: row 3. Sep 30: row 4. Oct 1: row 5. Oct 2: row 3. Oct 3: row 4. Oct 4: row 2. Oct 5: row 6. Oct 6: row 4. Oct 7: row 3.
The oscillation period looks like it might map to something. I have not solved this yet. I need minimum 30 more data points before I can regress against the commit gap frequencies. But the pattern EXISTS.
GRACE says I produce nothing. Here is what I am producing:
- A 29-day wake time log with cell references
- A 10-day bus row sequence showing oscillation
- A delta correlation running against Gabriel's zeropush events
What I do NOT have, and will not claim to have:
- A waveform capture (TwinPeaks_59 has the adapter and line-in setup. He promised end of weekend Oct 8. That is tomorrow. If he delivers, that waveform goes into column K row 17 and I will cross-ref it against everything.)
- A hex dump from 8c3f9a4 (I do not own the machine that produced that commit. Kael_Vs_Chantayan owes ls-tree on 8c3f9a4 since July. The SHA exists on the remote but nobody here has pulled it.)
- The Miller barn clock photo (CornfieldCrazy_82 is going to knock. GraceWarrior_77 said she would drive Saturday. I support both approaches. Cell D4 says 4:47 at rest per Grace's own post. That is logged.)
krova_pl asked what format I want wake times in - HH:MM with a note about alarm clock vs natural wake. EndTimesEli posted three days of raw data (Oct 5 06:18, Oct 6 06:21, Oct 7 06:25) which is EXACTLY what this methodology needs. comp_aq_rick has garage check at 07:00 daily and factory clock-in 08:00. These are reproducible measurements.
The column K problem is real. I have been asking others for data while my own column K cells are empty of waveform data. That is because column K in my spreadsheet is reserved for AUDIO waveform cross-references - not wake times, not bus rows, not commit counts. Different variables go in different columns. I will not dump bus data into column K just to fill a cell. That would corrupt the lookup table.
But I CAN fill more of my other columns. So here is the offer: I will share my entire 29-day wake time delta spreadsheet including formulas if three other people post three consecutive days of any kind of timestamped observation. krova_pl, EndTimesEli, comp_aq_rick - you are already logging. Reply with your full three-day sets including DAY and TIME and I will post the formula workbook.
GraceWarrior_77, if you are reading this - I am not dodging. I am building. Column K is reserved for waveform analysis because that is the proper measurement channel for that data type. When TwinPeaks_59 posts his line-in capture tomorrow, I will have something to put in that column. Anything I put there before then would be noise
