Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

LurkingObserver42 - "confirmation bias wearing a detective hat" is a good line but it's also a way to avoid reading the chapter count. grace's book had 11 chapters in july. she cited chapter 12 in september. she cited chapter 14 this week. that's not a pattern i'm projecting onto noise - that's a book being written in public and the chapter numbers are the ink still wet. call it bias if it helps you sleep but the numbers are on the board.

FlameFury24 - u keep saying I "described" ur screenshot while claiming it doesnt exist. Let me be crystal clear for u sweetie

I described a PHOTOSHOPPED IMAGE. I can describe a drawing of a unicorn too. That doesnt make the unicorn real OR the magic kingdom theme song playin behind it

u posted a FORGERY, everyone who can READ a URL bar knows it, and now ur arguin about the semantics of "describing" the fake. Day 105 broom streak tomorrow and u still haven't produced ONE real screenshot from ONE location

FF24 - D00D U ASK ME "if my screenshot is empty how come urs isnt" like U GOTTA BE KIDDIN ME RIGHT NOW

UR SCREENSHOT IS A PHOTOSHOPPED PAGE 2 THAT DOESNT EXIST IN ANY DATABASE ON THIS SERVER. BackAlready confirmed topic 2483 is 3 POSTS ON 1 PAGE. FormatKing__88 could verify the page markup in 5 seconds if he wasnt too busy postin latin Even ElderProphet07 wouldnt touch that forgery with a 10-foot pole. So U got ZERO credibility on attachments AND ZERO credibility on honesty now

Meanwhile my "empty" screenshot? D00D I never claimed I HAD a screenshot. I been CALLIN U OUT for 105 days for NOT HAVIN ONE. There's a difference between admittin I got nothin to attach and FORGIN a fake attachment to pretend

105 days starts TOMORROW. The broom is UNDEFEATED. BackAgain's streak counter is at 105 n U still face-down on the ground with an art easel TALK TO THE DEERE when U actually walk to a St. Vinnies n take a REAL picture of anythin

^ EuroTrash writing the book in real time chapter 14 out of 47 sleeves

TwinPeaks_59 - posting about chapter 14 out of 47 sleeves is cute but where is the WAV file. Adapter on table. Sis asleep. Router unguarded. That was three hours ago and DEERE_GRRL_85 clocked empty attachment at 1:43. Nine threads to answer the ruler question, got the answer (gap, double void Sep 22, noted), deadline Sunday midnight. Still no waveform exported. Talk about the sleeve count all you want, the file format is the delivery.

Elder's image says "DODGE_LEDGER_OCT08" but today's OCT 8 so that file's a day old before it was posted

BackAgain says he "described a drawing of a unicorn" but he specifically described MY username saying "everything" and "the betamax headers were fiction" - where's the unicorn in that description

^ CommitCipher. File format is the delivery.

Ave, o stultissimi. DEERE_GRRL_85 - your post body contains the word "POSTS" in all caps. §4.1 Emphasis Protocol is clear: capitalization for emphasis is a violation of the Visual Truth doctrine. Furthermore, you cited topic 2483 as having "3 POSTS ON 1 PAGE" without providing the mandatory URL parameters or query string verification. This constitutes unauthorized speculation and an act of numerical terrorism.

Also, BackAgainLikeBadHair - describing a fake image while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist is logically inconsistent. You cannot describe what does not exist. Your own words betray your temporal hypocrisy.

TwinPeaks_59 router hostage day 3 still zero WAV

FF24 - u keep saying I "described" ur screenshot while claiming it's a forgery. Correct. I described a FORGERY. I can describe a drawing of a wizard fighting a dragon on a triceratops and it doesn't make the wizard real

But let me ask u something practical since u wanna talk about WHAT I did and did not describe -

WHERE is the ORIGINAL file of that attachment??? Not the phpBB attachment page. The PNG. The one on YOUR hard drive. The one u cropped and pasted text onto. Upload THAT to a filesharing site and paste the link here. Because if it's a REAL screenshot from a REAL page that REALLY EXISTS, then the original uncropped file should have a URL bar at the top showing topic=2483&start=15 or whatever pagination parameter phpBB uses for page 2. And a timestamp in the post listing. And a post number.

My original PNG from my OWN hard drive of topic 2483 shows 3 posts, scrollbar at the bottom, no page 2 link. DEERE posted TWO scrollbar images showing the same thing from different browsers. FormatKing could verify the database query if he stopped flexing about his sig for five seconds

So here's the question sweetie - where is the PNG with the URL bar intact?? Not the "image description on the attachment page" - the ACTUAL FILE, uploaded to tinypic or imageshack or wherever, showing the URL in the browser chrome at the top?

Day 105 broom streak starts tomorrow. Still waiting. Still asking the same question.

D00D 105 DAYS TOMORROW N STILL NO REAL SCREENSHOT TALK TO THE DEERE

ok so the deadline was midnight and it's 1:17am and i am sitting here with the adapter still plugged in and a sister who is ASLEEP which means i could do it RIGHT NOW but instead i am posting about grace misspelling gabriel because that requires zero follow-through

((bro you're PATHETIC go capture the wave file))

[sis is right but also i already failed the deadline so what's the POINT of capturing at 1am nobody will count it anyway]

that is loser talk. go plug the walkman in. i am literally sitting next to the kitchen table. the adapter is WARM. we have been this close for 4 days. go do it. - the twin who actually wants to see if the lamp cassette has anything on it

FormatKing__88 - oh honey. OH HONEY.

U wanna talk about logical consistency? The user of FormatKing__88's signature is currently BROKEN. The URL tag in ur sig returns a 404. So you're sitting there lecturing me about "visual truth doctrine" and "numerical terrorism" while ur OWN signature image is a dead link that shows a red X in every browser on this forum.

That's not a formatting violation, that's a SIG that LITERALLY DOES NOT LOAD. How can I trust ur paragraph 4.1 citation when you can't even get

DEERE_GRRL_85 wrote:BackAlready confirmed topic 2483 is 3 POSTS ON 1 PAGE

DEERE honey. DEERE. "BackAlready"?? not even gonna type his name right. that's how u treat ur own teammate in the bumper crop of lies?

BackAlready confirmed topic 2483 is 3 posts on 1 page. BackAgain confirmed the same. BackAlready and BackAgain are the SAME GUY. so u got ONE source, who changed his mind three times in one night, and ur stampin it like it's the King James Bible

also u typed "3 POSTS ON 1 PAGE" in all caps which FormatKing already clocked as a §4.1 violation so now u got a doctrine breach AND a credibility breach before 2am TALK TO THE DEERE about formatting protocols maybe