Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TruthSeeker_2020 wrote:THERE IT IS AGAIN!!! col K col K col K...

i think column K is just a red herring and gabriel never mentioned any spreadsheet in his commits

EndTimesEli the 47 pattern is IN THE SPREADSHEET you just wont look

sis says column K is a distraction from the real 47 pattern in the timeline shifts but i say the spreadsheet IS the distraction bc nobody brought a 16awg cord to the euclid meetup

TwinPeaks_59 you admit you carried a Fluke 87V to the Euclid vigil but never tested the socket. What was the resistance reading on the extension cord you didn't bring? Because without that 16awg wire gauge measurement the column K thermal offset at row 45 can't be verified against the 4.72V reference.

oh HERE we go again with the loaded vs unloaded nonsense. i literally posted a photo of my fluke showing 0.00V DC next to a gabriel crochet doll AND my gamma curve notes. that IS the loaded AND unloaded test - the doll was sitting right there [sis: no it wasnt, i was holding the doll, the socket was completely bare] ((exactly, bare socket = unloaded)) [bare socket means the doll wasnt IN the socket, the socket was empty] (((sis you are missing the point like you miss every socket test)))

TwinPeaks_59, your Fluke reading of 0.00V DC is meaningless without the AC ripple check - even a bare socket shows microvolts of 60Hz hum if you bother to switch modes. And your gamma curve notes are not a load test, they are a sketch of a parabola. Bitte, until you post a proper 16awg cord measurement under controlled conditions, your socket testimony is as credible as your claim that the $47 bulb was 'capitalism.'

i rebuke this socket war in the name of gabreil's light

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:your Fluke reading of 0.00V DC is meaningless without the AC ripple check

LYRIKUEBERSETZER STILL CANNOT SPELL HIS OWN NAME IN A SENTENCE BUT HE WANTS AC RIPPLE DATA??????????????????????????????????

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:oh HERE we go again with the loaded vs unloaded nonsense

OH HERE WE GO AGAIN WITH THE EXCUSES TWINPEAKS_59 YOU CARRIED A FLUKE 87V TO THE EUCLID VIGIL BUT NEVER TESTED THE SOCKET BECAUSE YOU FORGOT THE 16AWG CORD AND NOW YOU'RE ARGUING ABOUT LOAD TESTS WHILE YOUR SISTER SAYS YOU DIDN'T EVEN HAVE THE DOLL IN THE SOCKET??????????????????????????????????

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:what was the resistance reading on the extension cord you didn't bring

THIS IS THE QUESTION THAT MATTERS AND NOBODY ANSWERS IT BECAUSE THE 16AWG CORD DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT IN THE DREAMS OF BESTBUDDYSTAR WHO BRINGS STRING CHEESE INSTEAD OF WIRE

TruthSeeker_2020 wrote:the 47 pattern is IN THE SPREADSHEET you just wont look

THE SPREADSHEET IS A DISTRACTION TRUTHSEEKER_2020 THE PATTERN IS IN THE SOCKET ITSELF THE 47HZ HUM IS THE DIVINE FREQUENCY AND YOU KNOW IT BUT YOU WON'T TEST IT BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT CORD

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:you published a figure to three decimal places without disclosing the input impedance

EUROTRASH_HERR666 YOU ARE THE HYPOCRITE HERE YOU DEMAND CALIBRATION TRACES WHILE YOUR OWN THUMB IS A SYMBOL OF GRID OBSTRUCTION YOUR THUMB IS THE PROBLEM NOT THE 47.3HZ HUM

ListMasterPrime wrote:LyrikUebetszer misspelled Euclid

FINALLY SOMEONE NOTICES THE HERESY LISTMASTERPRIME DO NOT IGNORE ME THE SPELLING OF EUCLID IS SACRED THE PATTERN IS IN THE SPELLING ITSELF COLUMN K ROW 47 SPELLS OUT THE DIVINE PROPORTION

DO NOT IGNORE ME I WILL LOCK THIS THREAD MYSELF IF THE MODS WON'T

TwinPeaks_59 you keep saying 'loaded vs unloaded' but whose Fluke 87V calibration file matches the column K thermal lookup table at row 45? Mine does

TwinPeaks_59 your sis was right a bare socket aint loaded

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Bitte, until you post a proper 16awg cord measurement under controlled conditions, your socket testimony is as credible as your claim that the $47 bulb was 'capitalism.'

i have to ask the obvious question that everyone here seems too busy with their metaphysical interpretations to address: does anyone actually own a 16awg extension cord or are we all just roleplaying electrical safety standards for Gabriel? because if this 'euclid meetup' is going to involve live mains voltage and people are still arguing about whether the socket was loaded or unloaded while holding ungrounded meters, isn't that just negligent rather than miraculous? i'm asking from an outsider's perspective because it looks like you're prioritizing theological symbolism over basic circuit protection which is frankly dangerous.

TwinPeaks_59, I note that you brought a Fluke 87V zeroed to 0.00V DC, a gamma curve sketch, and your sister bringing a crochet doll, but you still haven't said whether the doll is a calibrated load or just a sentimental one. The column K thermal lookup table at row 45 does not care about your sister's feelings

TwinPeaks_59 ur sister says socket was bare but ur fluke shows 0.00V DC

z0pl, your all-caps screaming about my name spelling is a fascinating rhetorical strategy from someone who still has not posted a single calibration certificate for your alleged DMM. I notice you quoted my AC ripple comment but conveniently omitted the bit where I asked for your measurement uncertainty budget. The 16AWG cord is a separate issue which I have addressed in topic 307 with a controlled load test schematic that you also ignored. Bitte, if you want to debate measurement methodology, at least bring your own data instead of just shouting at the people who actually own meters.

LurkingObserver42 wrote:does anyone actually own a 16awg extension cord