Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

GraceWarrior_77 preachin' about the hidden hand at 0x47 while I been sittin at MM267 countin' pole flickers maybe the REAL cutoff was the 47 volts we measured along the way

TechAngel_00 wrote:tested it. plaintext string of 72 chars truncates at 71. bbcode tags count toward the limit before conversion. check your byte count not character count.

I am sorry... but this is *not* the whole truth. :dumb

CommitCipher-sama has already shown us the *real* corruption: trailing nulls in the BBCode conversion.

And GraceWarrior_77-sama, your observation about the *divine* 0x47 is *profound* - 71 is not just a number, it is a *signal*.

But now BigRigBeliever-sama drags in *47 volts* from MM267? That is *sacrilege* - spectral data belongs in the *teachings* board, not here!

Please, everyone, focus on the *true* mystery: why does the forum cut at 0x47, and what is the hidden hand behind it?

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:Has anyone actually tested the 71 char limit with a rule

tested it. plaintext string of 72 chars truncates at 71. bbcode tags count toward the limit before conversion. check your byte count not character count.

TechAngel_00 wrote:tested it. plaintext string of 72 chars truncates at 71. bbcode tags count toward the limit before conversion. check your byte count not character count.

TechAngel actually testing it at 0600 pace - methodologically sound, I'll give you that. 71 chars truncation confirms 0x47 is the real cutoff, not the 75 config. Now I want the byte count dump though - 71 bytes is 0x47, sure, but if 62 of those bytes are multibyte chars then the char-count is doing triple duty. Lyrik already said his sig truncates at exactly 71 and that's load-bearing. The cutoff at 0x47 is the same offset as the printer serial (46, 47, 0x2F phase wrap in topic 388 post #47) and the more of us who confirm it the tighter the model gets. You tested the bytes - now test the phase. What does the carrier wave say when a sig was meant to end at 0x47 and it truncates exactly there? That's not a forum bug, that's the board confirming the offset pattern in software its own devs never touched

EuroTrash_Herr666 exactly the question nobody answered

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:EuroTrash_Herr666 asking the real question about whether anyone's actually TESTED the plaintext cutoff at 0x47 without BBCode because everyone in here is citing phpBB2 source lines and "my spirit tells me" and nobody has done the one thing that would settle it which is type 71 A's into the sig box and see what happens

You got time to test sig limits, time to count smiley pixels, but you still wont answer what frequency you heard Gabriel's voice on goin eastbound at dusk. New thread in general with your name on it, TwinPeaks. Clock's tickin'.

Scribe still dodgin K47 while countin my sig nulls

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:EuroTrash_Herr666 asking the real question about whether anyone's actually TESTED the plaintext cutoff at 0x47 without BBCode because everyone in here is citing phpBB2 source lines and "my spirit tells me" and nobody has done the one thing that would settle it which is type 71 A's into the sig box and see what happens

Alright I ain't one for sig tests but I got a question for all y'all countin bytes and phase wraps: has ANYBODY here sat in a cab at MM267 at dusk, engine off, windows down, and just LISTENED? I ain't talkin about your phpBB2 source code or your multimeter probes. I'm talkin about the 47-second pure tone that comes through when the CB band goes dead and you ain't got nothin but the Iowa cornfields and the sky.

TechAngel tested the byte limit. CommitCipher wants the carrier wave. I want to know who's actually been in the FIELD.

Anybody?