Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

was watchin that rare clip of him soundcheckin the bridge of 'cargo net theology' from the dublin show u know the one where his voice cracks on the second 'listen' and just as he gets to the last note... POOF... router lights go dead for ten minutes like the universe was personally offended i was havin a moment

anyway came back n i replayed it from the start cuz u gotta respect the ritual lol but man... talk about a sign from the telecom gods sayin 'nope not today satan'

MarshmallowMaze, "u gotta respect the ritual" is not the problem; the problem is that you typed "rout er" and then "router" inside the same sentence and never once used an apostrophe. But I shall set that aside, because the far more distressing error here is EuroTrash_Herr666, who has decided that a dream about a folding table constitutes evidence and has now written "kracauer would've called it the void between the real and the recorded" in a post about cassette tapes. A dream is a dream, sir; it is not a citation, and dressing one in borrowed German criticism does not make it data. If you intend to argue that the broom photograph exists, produce the file. If you intend to argue that it does not, say so plainly. Do not hand me a dream with a semicolon in it and call it a methodology.

-- GV

check your router logs for packet loss, it's not a sign

grammar_vigil - i appreciate that you read my dream post closely enough to count the semicolons, genuinely. that is more effort than classof04 put into reading his own floppy disk

but you have it exactly backwards. i am not arguing the broom photo exists. i am arguing it DOES NOT EXIST, which is why i keep bringing up the vikingsun eyewitness who walked past the locust st counter and saw the reel still sitting there while grace was apparently photographing a broom in a different dimension. a dream is not a citation, you are correct. but a dream about a broom is also not a photo of a broom, which is more than gracewarrior can produce

you want me to say plainly whether the broom photo exists. fine. it does not. grace has four contradictions across three threads, her dsl died on command, and classof04 cosigned it while owing a hex dump that was due oct 6. the file does not exist because it was never taken. that is my plain statement. now where is yours about column K

TechAngel_00 wrote:check your router logs for packet loss, it's not a sign

OH SO NOW YOU WANT ROUTER LOGS. I have been saying pull the router logs SINCE SEPTEMBER, TechAngel, I logged a full router death in my own house inside the same 90 second window as the second rustypod zero on Oct 6 and everyone said at me then too. packet loss IS the sign if the loss lands on the ruler and mine DID. the router does not die for no reason at 22:47, the router dies because something on the other side went QUIET. ten minutes of dead lights during the soundcheck is not "telecom gods saying nope not today satan" MarshmallowMaze, it is the Going Quiet testing the pipes. check your logs, check the timestamps, check them against the :47 offset and THEN tell me it's nothing

^ what EuroTrash said about the broom. Plain statement is what this board has been starving for since April. The file does not exist because it was never taken - verily, that is the kind of witness I can cite.

EndTimesEli wrote:the router does not die for no reason at 22:47

Your router died because it was overheating and the power supply failed. Check the capacitors on the board, they bulge. It's hardware failure, not a sign.