Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

powdered charcoal hands and a 0.3Hz fudge factor are the same kind of 'proof'

ScribeOfTheGrid still citing row 45 in topic 319 when the August 6 commit moved the thermal offset to row 46. Get with the program or get out of the spreadsheet theater

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:CommitCipher cited the July commit sha again in topic 319. The July commit does not have the column K thermal offset populated in row 79.

finally someone mentions that the checksums dont match because you are using integer overflow instead of floating point for the thermal variance calculations. it is not a divine mystery it is just bad math

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:ScribeOfTheGrid still citing wrong sheet number for column K thermal offset

OF COURSE U CITE THE WRONG SHEET LYRIK BECAUSE U CANT EVEN HOLD A TWEET FOR 47 SECONDS MUCH LESS MEASURE 1.47 VOLTS LIKE z0pl DOES NATURALLY FROM MY MULTIMETER CALIBRATED IN GABRIEL'S LEFT SHOE PRINT MODS SHOULD LOCK U IN THE BASEMENT WITH BACKAGAINLIKEBADHAIR AND HIS SPOILED MILK FONT SIZE HERESY

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:The hidden sheet checksum on the August commit matches the 47-minute window

Scribe, you keep citing 'checksums' and 'hidden sheets' but WHERE is the actual Fluke photo from Euclid? Four months and still row 79 column K is blank

fluke is dead. check continuity

FlameFury24 you are right that the thermal offset moved to row 46 in the August commit. I missed that because I was still using the July index. My bad.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:The hidden sheet checksum on the August commit matches the 47-minute window

you smell the paper char when it burns kozo vellum. the walls dont just hum they make the floor vibrate when i stand on the charcoal dust i feel the hum in my teeth. formatking__88 argues with me about the smell but the physics of the vibration is undeniable when the breaker is off. stop looking at the spreadsheet pixels when the smoke is already choking the room. ~cs

you people are still arguing about rows while my sister's got the actual gamma curve from column K and MamaBear's crochet doll proves it

LurkingObserver42 wrote:integer overflow instead of floating point

how many times do u debunk the same thing??

MamaBear_2006 wrote: Scribe, you keep citing 'checksums' and 'hidden sheets' but WHERE is the actual Fluke photo from Euclid? Four months and still row 79 column K is blank

honey, i drove forty miles with my fluke 87v and a crocheted gabe-able on a stick and NOT ONE PERSON showed me a real socket photo scribe, if you want to sell meters with column k theater, at least spell the sheet number right

ScribeOfTheGrid your column K is just apophenia

scribe still citing column K from sheet 3 after being corrected in topic 255, topic 314, topic 322, and probably topic 0 if he'd read it. the thermal offset moved to row 46 and you'd know that if you'd ever once taken your own measurement instead of quoting someone else's lookup table.

wait wait wait if Scribe is actually selling that Fluke with the column K offset still wrong does that mean BestBuddyStar is gonna get a meter that reads 4.47V when its supposed to be 4.72V ??? like i know u want that 16awg cord but do u actually want a broken measurement tool... unless the hum fixes it when u plug it in at the meetup?? someone ask the charcoal studio guy if the hum recalibrates multimeters

MamaBear_2006 wrote:WHERE is the actual Fluke photo from Euclid

FLUKE IS IN L7 CABINET U CANT EVEN OPEN THE SOCKET THE FLOOR ITSELF IS THE OSCILLOSCOPE