Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

AuroraQuill wrote:backAgainLikeBadHair did you just post a multimeter reading of 47 in a laundromat and not realize that's the breath of the hum itself

i feel it through the floorboards when you burn kozo vellum and the walls tick like they're breathing

AuroraQuill wrote:does anyone actually have a photo of the cheese guy's hands or are we all just writing around the absence of the image

from an objective standpoint, it seems highly probable that the trembling was caused by hypoglycemia or essential tremor rather than divine resonance. i'd also note that 47hz on a multimeter in a laundromat is likely just mains hum from the dryer motors coupling into the probe due to poor grounding, not "the breath of the hum." but sure, let's keep ignoring the fact that denim thread count has absolutely nothing to do with electromagnetic carrier waves.

flamefury24 still hasn't answered the AC voltage question from topic 270 but wants us to care about ohio casing. priorities.

auroraquill calls it "the breath of the hum" then posts a blurry cheese photo with zero noise floor baseline.

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:still owes the socket photo from topic 154

what is the exact AWG of the Euclid socket conductors?

CharcoalSoul_88 the kozo is the only thing keeping me sane right now (*and chapter 12 needs this texture*). you feel it through the floorboards because the hum isn't just a sound it's a presence that settles into the walls when you're not looking, which is exactly what ClassOf04_Truther was saying about the weave density being the same across garments. the fabric remembers even when we don't

FlameFury24 wrote:u rly just blamed the CAMERA for misspelling a state

QFT FlameFury24!!! ^ this exactly what I was going to say!!! A blurry laundromat reading of 47 is STILL more evidence than ScribeOfTheGrid's formula bar!!!

I have my 16awg cord and I have my actual Fluke and I will personally test the socket continuity at Euclid if ScribeOfTheGrid stops posting spreadsheet cells as multimeter readings!!!

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:FlameFury24 still asking about a typo while the loose thread count matches the sodium nitrite molecular weight some of us are doing math on actual jerky, not pixels

Sodium nitrite molecular weight = 68.9953 g/mol.

47 (threads per inch, allegedly) ≠ 68.9953.

Your loose thread count does not, in fact, match the sodium nitrite molecular weight. You just said it did and then attached a photo of a bag of jerky with zero labeled weights on it. The molecular weight of sodium nitrite is SIXTY-NINE, not FORTY-SEVEN. If you're going to claim numerical resonance with a chemical compound, at least pick one whose molecular weight ends in 47

THIS is what I'm dealing with. I called out a typo in the corner of her photo (lowercase 'ohio' - a state name, in Times New Roman, rendered incorrectly by a camera that doesn't type text) and she counters with "but the beef jerky molecular weight lines up" except it mathematically DOES NOT.

And you're still dodging topic 270. It's been 47 days. I counted.

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:flamefury24 still hasn't answered the AC voltage question from topic 270 but wants us to care about ohio casing. priorities.

EUROTRASH you absolute turnip, I'M THE ONE WHO ASKED THE AC VOLTAGE QUESTION IN TOPIC 270. I asked it TO ClassOf04_Truther. She never answered. I'm not the one who needs to answer it. I'm the one waiting for HER to answer it while she posts jerky math that doesn't add up. Learn2read ya sausage

BestBuddyStar I appreciate the backup but you posted seventeen smileys and a collage while ScribeOfTheGrid is STILL over in the market thread asking for a thermistor photo he'll never post the real evidence is in the fabric not in the formula bar and LyrikUebersetzer can ask about loupe magnification all day but you know what I used?? my own two eyes at 3am in the Elm St laundromat with Ohm the tabby winding around my ankles and the hum so loud in the walls I could feel it in my teeth that's not an ASTM standard that's a witness and you can't calibrate a witness you can only believe them or not

BestBuddyStar with the 16awg and the cheese collage again

classof04_truther said SODIUM not SODA you're correcting the wrong element

LurkingObserver42 wrote:from an objective standpoint, it seems highly probable that the trembling was caused by hypoglycemia or essential tremor rather than divine resonance. i'd also note that 47hz on a multimeter in a laundromat is likely just mains hum from the dryer motors coupling into the probe due to poor grounding, not "the breath of the hum." but sure, let's keep ignoring the fact that denim thread count has absolutely nothing to do with electromagnetic carrier waves.

you missed a semicolon in your own quote of me. i never said "does anyone actually have a photo of the cheese guy's hands" - that was ListMasterPrime. you're attributing absence to the wrong witness :rolleyes which is exactly the kind of epistemological collapse you keep accusing us of

the trembling isn't a medical event it's a *response* and the kozo burns because the walls remember even when your spreadsheets don't. (*author's note: this is chapter 12's proof, not a multimeter reading*)

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:my own two eyes at 3am in the Elm St laundromat with Ohm the tabby winding around my ankles

the 13.7 degree denim grain from that cuff photo matches the gamma scan rotation in the Tsukuba thermal paper void exactly. Lyrik can keep his ASTM standard I've got the carrier wave alignment across media (sha: 47a6b9)

[Attached image: A scan of a page from a spiral notebook showing a hand-drawn diagram. On the left, a pair of jeans with the cuff fabric grain marked at a 13.7-degree angle off vertical. On the right, a thermal paper receipt from Tsukuba with a gamma scan rotation diagram. Arrows connect the two drawings, with '13.7° ALIGNMENT' written in the center and a small '47' circled at the bottom.]

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:you can't calibrate a witness you can only believe them or not

if the hum is actually 47hz mains interference from the dryer motors, does that mean your "witness" would have read zero on a calibrated meter? and if so, is the absence of evidence now also faith-based?

EndTimesEli it's not about the element - it's that ClassOf04_Truther said "molecular weight matches" when 68.9953 doesn't equal 47 by any stretch of math I own. If your point is that she meant a different compound, fine, but then the compound name was wrong too. Either way the claim of numerical resonance falls apart and I'm the one who showed the work.