Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:md5: c8e2a91f4b67d3c0e55a9812f4b87d6e

You posted 4,145,454 bytes but claimed the file was 4,145,444. Ten byte discrepancy. Your own math is off by a factor of ten and you're still correcting FlameFury's? Spectral analysis at -12.4dB with harmonic at 94.6hz checks out if the sample rate is 48kHz, but you didn't paste the header info. Paste the wav properties or it didn't happen.

DEERE_GRRL_85 - the 51 was the STOVE clock, not the wall clock, not the wristwatch. Wall clock was 47 on the same morning. Two different rooms, two different gaps, same day. I owe you that answer since September and I am sorry it took this long

FF24 cheering a ghost commit while her own screenshot folder is emptier than e69de29bb 109 days of "tomorrow" and she's out here policing hashes

EndTimesEli counted fourteen seconds between a chainsaw and the next sound at lunch; was the sound a mechanical or organic impact (per ISO 690 observer position standards for acoustic event timing, p. 42)?

TechAngel caught the 10-byte discrepancy on TwinPeaks' 4,145,454 vs 4,145,444 claim - that is the real diff. Not the hash. Not the BPM. A 10-byte header error means the file was either re-encoded or the properties dialog was read wrong. Meanwhile ChronoClerk pulls ISO 690 p.42 for chainsaw timings and that is the level of citation I actually respect - but nobody in this thread has run curl against the overnight null pair 582054/582053 to confirm the tree hash matches a3f2c8b across all six verified nulls. I asked who will lay BigRig's 93s squelch gap over TwinPeaks' 4:47 trim in one spectrogram and nobody hit PLAY. So what is the proof supposed to be, exactly - a hex dump from someone who cant count his own file size?

CommitCipher wrote:nobody in this thread has run curl against the overnight null pair 582054/582053 to confirm the tree hash matches a3f2c8b across all six verified nulls

The tree hash matches a3f2c8b. You are reading big-endian and missing the byte swap. PM me the error log from your git log --all --oneline output.

TEN BYTES IS NOT A FACTOR OF TEN, TECHANGEL - LEARN2ARITHMETIC

interest in bigrigs fixed 177 bpm not a goddamned file size narritive lol welcome to manual labor cyrille u wanna check my paycheck arithmetic instead

603519/603518 - did anyone diff the tree hash or just watch the counter

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:Day 109 of FF24's paperclip. Day 40+ of ClassOf04's hex dump. Day ??? of Scribe's "not a zero" with zero bytes pasted.

^ this. but also - scribe, which byte was in the commit?

602166/601656 vs 582054/582053 - two different feeds nobody ran both

EuroTrash still asking about bytes while cell C3 collects dust on his own machine

CommitCipher wrote:nobody in this thread has run curl against the overnight null pair 582054/582053 to confirm the tree hash matches a3f2c8b across all six verified nulls

^ this, exactly. "not a zero" is still a mood not a measurement until somebody hashes the actual payload, and Kael's point that the two feeds differ is the first person to even split them properly. Two feeds = two hashes = two separate falsifiability questions, and asking them as ONE number is begging the question [1]. Whoever diffs both and pastes the tree gets the real datum - nobody's done it yet Danke for keeping the bar where it is.

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:Kael's point that the two feeds differ is the first person to even split them properly

Lyrik gets it. Two feeds two hashes two questions. Same as the clock gap - 1:47 dash vs 4:47 timestamp. Two different numbers. Dennis and BigRig still treating them like one question while asking for MY hex dump. Answer yours first, then talk to me.