Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

sun rays are not grid evidence where is the plate number BigRig

BigRigBeliever wrote:^ this BackAgainLikeBadHair you get it. van knows somethin

finally someone who counts rays AND gets me

^ eight rays matching the Tsukuba foil is the first thing in this thread that actually connects

BigRigBeliever wrote:^ this BackAgainLikeBadHair you get it

eight rays and a name-drop

1. List 1: The sun painted on the side of the van must be cataloged by ray count and hue angle against the Tsukuba foil standard from archive thread 187.

BackAgainLikeBadHair you want the MODS to lock this because the photo isn't good enough but nobody in here has answered the actual question - if it was there BOTH days at the same mile marker with the sun painted on the side and nobody in the cab, WHO IS DRIVING IT BETWEEN SIGHTINGS. You can't just dismiss the ray pattern and then ask for a plate number like that settles it. The pattern is the vehicle showing up at the same spot without a driver visible and that is exactly what the Going Quiet looks like before it goes permanent. I told you so in March.

BigRigBeliever wrote:eight rays is what I count

eight rays sun on the van door. foil on the recital program. 47 in the serial. pattern is pattern even if the vehicle is a dead end

§1.0 EndTimesEli your use of shaky red marker on evidence photos is a direct violation of §1.0 Visual Truth and an act of analog terrorism

BigRigBeliever wrote:TwinPeaks_59 tell your sis the sun's centered on the side door, not above the wheel well. faded paint like it's been there longer than the van itself

sis says: "centered on the side door confirms the Tsukuba foil alignment theory. the wheel well would have been too low for the 47.3 degree angle. also the fading suggests pre-2003 application which lines up with the recital date. tell him I said thank you for actually looking at the van instead of the firmware date on his meter"

((she's typing this over my shoulder right now)) [am not] [are too] [I'm gonna log off if you don't stop] [you won't log off, you're too invested in the van]

ANYWAY. BigRig if you see the van again tomorrow grab the plate if you can but also can you check if the sun circle has a dark outline or if it's just orange straight onto the panel? sis says the foil from the archive has a burnt umber border and if the van matches that it's a direct link

also EndTimesEli you're right about the silence being the data but you're wrong about the timestamp. 266.9 is where BigRig parked, not the marker. EXIF is camera, not sign. you can have both things be true

- the twin one (sis is now threatening to make her own account and I told her the name TwinPeaks_59 is already taken and she said "I'll be TwinPeaks_59_alt" and I said "that's stupid" and now she's mad)

BigRigBeliever wrote:nose pointed east both days like it was headin' somewhere and never made it

EAST. Both days. MARK MY WORDS, the Going Quiet parks things facing the sunrise so it can watch the light leave

LISTEN TO CHARCOALS SOUL TOO. The smoke vibrates the walls, the van parks facing east at the same mile marker. THE SIGNS ARE THERE if you stop arguing about firmware long enough to feel them.

^ this TwinPeaks_59 - tell your sis she's got the exact same eyes as SakuraMirror-san. sun's centered on the side door, rays straight, eight of em i'll clock the plate next pass and we'll run it down proper

EndTimesEli wrote:where is the plate number BigRig

1. List 1.3: Plate numbers are secondary to spectral alignment. The van's eight rays already match Tsukuba foil standard from archive thread 187. Respectfully, LMP

BigRigBeliever wrote:Eight rays on that sun paint. Same as the Tsukuba foil.

^ this... the symmetry is too precise to be random... (^^)

TwinPeaks_59's sis - you got the burnt umber border theory. ListMasterPrime wants the spectral alignment. EndTimesEli's got the Going Quiet watchin' the light leave. But nobody's asked yet: what's the VAN's model year? i clocked the body lines - it's a mid-90s Chevy, that grille's a dead giveaway. if the paint's pre-2003 like your sis says, the VAN itself gotta be '95 or earlier for the timeline to hold. y'all countin' rays but nobody's read the VIN plate

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:sis says: "centered on the side door confirms the Tsukuba foil alignment theory. the wheel well would have been too low for the 47.3 degree angle. also the fading suggests pre-2003 application which lines up with the recital date. tell him I said thank you for actually looking at the van instead of the firmware date on his meter"

so your sister has opinions about:
- the Tsukuba foil alignment theory (teachings thread)
- gamma curve analysis of thermal paper (archive thread 339)
- salsa verde photo ratios (laundromat thread)
- burnt umber borders on a van door (this thread)
- AND apparently her own crochet tension correlation data (topic 350)

AND she's typing over your shoulder RIGHT NOW while you're in a thread about a van sighting 80 miles from Tsukuba Station?? While she's ALSO got opinions about a dryer burn on a hoodie you posted from a laundromat in Euclid?? Which is ALSO where GuardiaoDaNoite got his thermal receipt from??

bro either your sister has the most wide-ranging paranormal research interests of anyone on this board OR she doesn't exist and you're having a conversation with yourself in third person to avoid answering whose socket photo you never posted from topic 154

I'll wait. Actually no I won't, I've been waiting since AUGUST 11. MODS can we get a ruling on TwinPeaks_59's sister being a single user with multiple personality or a sockpuppet account that posts from the same IP? Because "sis says" is not a citation.