Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

WROTE TONIGHTS FINAL NOTEBOOK ENTRY BY HAND. the interval between this weeks wake-time gaps and the ones from two autumns ago is ALMOST IDENTICAL - same week of october, same shape. i drew the line between the two circled dates with a shaky pen and i am asking this board straight: what is the proof supposed to BE if not this? i have circled dates six times and watched them get called coincidence every time, so tell me what you will actually accept, because if a cycle repeating across two years doesnt count then nothing counts and we are all just writing down numbers for nothing. i would rather know now than at the Going Quiet.

EndTimesEli wrote:WROTE TONIGHTS FINAL NOTEBOOK ENTRY BY HAND. the interval between this weeks wake-time gaps and the ones from two autumns ago is ALMOST IDENTICAL

"Almost identical" is doing a lot of work there, Eli. s2pid already caught your event IDs being off by thousands - if the IDs are wrong, the interval is built on numbers. What is the proof supposed to be when your foundation is a misread feed?

Bitte show the correct IDs before claiming a cycle. Otherwise this is just Grace's "Gabreil 3:16" with a notebook instead of a Bible.

two autumns matching means you circled the same calendar weeks, not the same null-push structure

the IDs match my clock what proof do you actually accept

circled dates arent proof eli wheres the actual evidence tho

Eli you circled the same calendar dates two years apart and called it a cycle, but TwinPeaks already got U on the null-push structure Two autumns matching on a calendar aint the same as two autumns matchin on the feed. I been watchin squelch pops on zero-commit nights long enough to know that a 47.3Hz hum pulse dont care what week it is on YOUR wall calendar. What is the proof supposed to BE for the rest of us if you wont lay the correct event IDs next to the circled dates? Cornfield posted a pic of your notebook page and I see random dates and pencil lines that could connect ANY wednesday to ANY other wednesday. I'm not buyin it. Show the feed numbers next to the circles or this is just notebook art.

Notebook circles and GMT headers still not tape, so what is proof supposed to BE for rest of us

Eli. Still circling dates on a calendar and calling it proof. Still wont take the 30-day experiment.

You asked the board "what is the proof supposed to BE" and I offered you a straight answer in the previous thread: log your wake time at 30 consecutive sunsets with a clock in frame. If the pattern holds, I'll concede it's not random. If it doesn't, you concede it's calendar coincidence.

You never took it. You called me a dodger and went back to circling dates.

Meanwhile TwinPeaks counted event IDs before they hit the board. BigRig actually posted a receipt. Cornfield posted system tray screenshots. CommitCipher curled four verified tree hashes in one session 93 seconds apart. These people are running DATA. You are running a spiral notebook with no feed numbers next to the circles, no clock in the photo, and no experiment acceptance.

The two-autumn interval matches what, exactly? You said "almost identical." Almost. That's doing the work.

"what is the proof supposed to BE for the rest of you" - we keep telling you and you keep circling instead of listening. A 30-day experiment. Clock in frame. Feed IDs next to the dates. That's what the proof is supposed to be.

Kael, you sure got a lot to say about proof and 30-day experiments and feed IDs for a man who still owes a straight answer on an April hex dump week 26 and I still aint seen it. not buyin the notebook art either, Eli, but you aint the only one holdin out on the evidence what is the proof supposed to be for the rest of us when Kael's got his own circles he wont share. regards, Dennes

Dennes still dodging in here and calling it "regards"

Kael_Vs_Chantayan wrote:Dennes still dodging in here and calling it "regards"

Kael.

You say I'm dodging? You say that to me? You with your April 2006 hex dump that you promised in topic 2891, topic 3012, topic 3220, topic 3459, and I don't know how many more topics I missed because I stopped countin after the fourth time you said "next week." Its week 26 tomorrow. TWENTY SIX. That's half a year, Kael. Half a year of me askin nice and you tellin me "next week" or "I'm workin on it" or "the file needs analysis first" or whatever excuse you had that week while you sit here demandin timestamps from DustyBoots and clock-in-frame photos from Eli and receipts from BigRig and system tray screenshots from Cornfield and 30-day experiments from everybody except yourself.

You know what I got for proof? I got a clock radio photo from September 29 that shows 1:47 on the display clear as day, scrolls GABRIEL across it when you plug it in, DustyBoots found it at a yard sale in Ohio, I posted it on this forum with a date and a time, and you never thanked me for it. Not once. You never said "thanks Dennes for shar in that photo." You never said anythin. You just kept askin other people for timestamps and photos while I'm sittin here with a clock radio that LITERALLY has a time on it and Gabriel's name scrollin across the screen.

And you still spell my name Dennes. I asked you politely about six months ago to spell it D-E-double N-I-S. D-E-N-N-I-S. Like my mother named me. You still type D-e-n-n-e-s. Dennes. Like you're talkin about a ten-year-old boy from a folk song. I'm 53 years old. I got two kids. I got a back that hurts from movin furniture. My own son dont call much. And the least you could do after 26 weeks of me askin is spell my name right and post the hex dump you promised.

But you wont. Cause you got all the standards in the world for everybody else and none for yourself.



regards,
Dennis

circled dates on a calendar = patterns in noise eli u act like a rusty radio aunt on 14th euclid but with a notebook