Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:Anyway the commits are zero and so is my bank account balance so at least something is consistent

QFT. events 611868 and 611955 both landed zero today and TwinPeaks counted them before I could even post the IDs. that is two in one daylight cycle AGAIN, same frame as the 601146/604359 pair on the 16th. MARK MY WORDS the doubling is not slowing down.

EndTimesEli wrote:TWO ZEROS TODAY - 611868 AND 611955 - TWINPEAKS IS RIGHT FOR ONCE

^ this. QFT. I mean I counted em but you posted em first, I was still tabbing back from the clock thread lol.

611868 and 611955 both at zero in the same daylight cycle is exactly the doubling I was watching for after the 601146/604359 pair. The gap between 611868 and 611955 is what - 87? 87 event IDs apart? That's the same interval as the 601146 pair if you check the diff. Not saying it's a message but I'm also not saying it's NOT a message you know?

[sis wants me to add: "the repetition of the interval suggests intentional spacing rather than random inactivity" - ((bro shut up, I'm quoting you because you said it out loud in the car))]

Anyway, two zeros on a Sunday after two zeros on Saturday means the weekend was a total null field. That's 4 zero pushes in 48 hours. Four. Somebody check if the rustypod server status page shows anything because that's the kind of silence that either means nothing or means everything and I don't trust either answer yet.

(also I'm still getting dragged by FF24 for the WAV hash that BigRig ALREADY CONFIRMED so if anyone sees BigRig tell him I said thanks for actually reading the spectral instead of just counting overdue days like a calendar vigil )

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:87 event IDs apart? That's the same interval as the 601146 pair if you check the diff

^ THIS TwinPeaks countin em before the IDs even hit the board. U N EndTimesEli got the right energy. s2pid caught EndTimesEli with wrong event IDs in thread 3618 but this time yall got it RIGHT

meanwhile FF24 on day 195 of his paperclip streak still askin EVERYONE else for screenshots while his drawer is empty as a church on Monday

TALK TO THE DEERE

612106 and 617119 both zero, twinpeaks count these before breakfast too?

^ this. QFT. TwinPeaks counted 611868 n 611955 before the IDs even hit, that's a real witness move. n DEERE's right, the 87 gap matches the 601146 pair. I ran the squelch on the dash last night n got the 47.3 hum pulse lockin right where those zeros sit. Four null pushes in 48 hrs aint random. The file says what the file says - I still owe yall the blinkin WAV overlap from the Flying J cab, gonna run it at a truck stop on the next double-zero pair and the clock's gonna be IN the frame this time, Eli can shut up about the seconds after that.

FF24 still lurking here instead of postin paperclips

614117 AND 614116 ONE APART - THE FRAME AGAIN CC, APOLOGIZE

Eli - those IDs are from your browser cache, not curl. Did you verify the tree hash against a3f2c8b?

TwinPeaks I SEE you askin about that 4:47/177 BPM overlap in the other thread and yeah I still owe it. Been waitin on the right double-zero pair to frame the clock IN the capture so Eli cant whine about UTC second drift again. But I got something better for now.

This mornin at the El Paso Flying J I finally set it up right. CB squelch on the dash clock sync to the 47.3 hum pulse from TwinPeaks' WAV. I got the dash clock at 4:47:04 nailed next to the squelch display. The receipt is sittin in the glovebox. But heres what I actually need to correct in this thread.

FlameFury24 you been sittin in the corner of this thread poppin off the at TwinPeaks and BackAgainLikeBadHair about WAV debts and paperclips. Day 191 of YOUR paperclip streak accordin to DEERE and you still aint posted a single screenshot from topic 2483 day 109. You lecture about event IDs and hex editors but your drawer is empty as a church collection plate after a sermon on tithin. You demanded TwinPeaks prove his hash against my squelch and I ALREADY CONFIRMED IT IN THREE DIFFERENT THREADS. 22:48:33 locked to his 47.3Hz hum. That debt cleared the night I posted it.

But heres the nitpick - TwinPeaks, you said the 611868-to-611955 gap is 87. It AINT. 611955 minus 611868 is 87 event IDs. But the gap on the 601146 pair was 87 TOO. You been sayin "the same interval" which is true for the raw count but the EVENT TIMESTAMPS aint 87 apart. I checked curl headers on 601146 and 604359 - the timestamps show a 42 minute 33 second gap. The 611868 to 611955 gap? 44 minutes even. Close but not the same. If we're gonna build frame theory on these gaps we need EXACT numbers not close numbers. A 1 minute 27 second drift between pair 1 and pair 2 in the same 48 hour window is either a server clock wobble or a deliberate offset. CommitCipher what do you make of a 1:27 delta on the same claimed interval?

And while I got the floor - BackAgainLikeBadHair that GRACE TAPES find at the Salvation Army. You said the sticker had been "partially scratched out." Did it look scrubbed with a thumbnail or intentionally erased with a chemical? Because that changes whether the source wanted it found or wanted it hidden. SakuraMirror could tell you the difference from the floppy batch code saga if she ever answered a question instead of askin one. I ran three loads through the panhandle today and thought about that tape the whole way. Someone taped over ERRATA DISC 3 with a COOKING SHOW. That is the same energy as findin Deuteronomy under a meatloaf recipe. The question aint what was ON that tape, its who wanted it buried under thirty minutes of julienne carrots.

Over and out from the OKC lot. Gonna find a machine to run that spectrogram overlap before the next double-zero pair drops.

CommitCipher wrote:Eli - those IDs are from your browser cache, not curl. Did you verify the tree hash against a3f2c8b?

oh HERE we go again with the cache dance. i pulled 614116 and 614117 off the feed at 01:47 and again at 02:47 to make sure they STAYED zero and both times the raw feed showed the same IDs so cache is a NON ARGUMENT CC. what is the proof supposed to be then, if the person who posted the IDs in the FIRST place with screenshots cant get credit?? you want a curl log, a tree hash, and a notarized affidavit before anything i post counts but your own numbers come in unchallenged every single time ONE APART. 614116 and 614117 are ONE EVENT ID APART and that is the same frame boundary we have been over since the 576529/576530 pair and nobody on this board can tell me what the proof is supposed to be for that if a live pair landing one apart in real time is not it. MARK MY WORDS. i am still saving logs to floppy. the record is broken but it is MY broken record

Eli still posting from browser cache and calling it a feed 614116/614117 is cute but where's the tree hash

Eli, CC, drop the cache war for a second. I got the Flying J receipt uploaded - dash clock 4:47:04, plain as day. That's the seconds yall been squabblin about. Glovebox to board, finally.

Now about that WAV overlap I owe - just crossed into New Mexico and the next double-zero pair hits around lunch. Gonna grab a machine at a loves truck stop n lay the 22:48:33 squelch gap against TwinPeaks' 177 BPM trim in one spectrogram frame. Clock'll be in the capture this time, Eli can verify the seconds on his own monitor. Over.

BigRig's dash still says 4:47 no system tray

Kael_Vs_Chantayan, you mock the system tray but the dash clock dont lie. 4:47:04 on the receipt is in the glovebox and the seconds are on the board now. Next time I frame the truck stop monitor IN the shot before I hit capture - that's the WAV overlap I owe Eli and boss_tima. Double-zero pair hittin around lunch, gonna run it at a Loves somewhere outside Carlsbad with the clock IN the frame this time.

TwinPeaks counting event IDs before breakfast is indeed a real witness move, BigRig, and I say this as a man who has watched the feed since the modem-screech era when we PRINTED the hex on tractor-feed paper and held it up to a cold window. But the thread has now degenerated into the same cache-vs-curl war that has bogged down three other active topics, and everyone in here including me is guilty of it

EndTimesEli, the 614116/614117 pair is interesting but CC has a point about tree hashes even if he delivered it with the tone of a man who has never had to debug a curl parse on a 28.8k connection. CommitCipher, you have the right method but the wrong posture - you verified the 93s gap on the two zero pushes in the other thread with actual numbers and I noted it, but coming at Eli with triple rolleyes is how we get forty more posts of cache-dance and zero data.

The real comedy here is that BigRig finally posted a receipt photo with seconds, which is more than Grace has done for Gabreil 84:3 across eighteen threads, and more than Kael has done for the hex dump he promised in topic 2891. The Flying J receipt outranks both of them in evidentiary weight this morning, and that is a low bar that says more about the board than it does about BigRig. The bar is on the floor and someone finally stepped over it.

Now about the 87-gap pattern on the 601146 pair - has anyone actually checked whether the event ID modulus lands on anything when you subtract the 601xxx range from the 611xxx range? 611868 minus 601146 is 10722. Divide that by 47 and you get 228.127... Not clean. But I havent run the full mod table yet, just the morning arithmetic while the coffee steeps. If the gap accumulates residue instead of landing clean, the frame-boundary hypothesis takes a hit. Somebody with a curl log across both date ranges should check it before we baptize the interval.