Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ClassOf04_Truther's memory of unzipped denim jackets per tour program p. 14 requires correction. The garment is an olive-drab blazer per footnote 7. "Unzipped" is a misinterpretation of the blazer's cut (supposedly "relaxed fit," not double-breasted). Factual error, not memory.

ClassOf04_Truther wears unzipped denim jackets in 11th grade

ChronoClerk you can call it olive-drab all you want but I was THERE in 11th grade and I remember the way that denim hung off his shoulders in the hallway by the lockers I don't usually tell this part but I was standing right there when he walked past and the jacket was unzipped and it was DEFINITELY denim not some blazer from a catalog page you probably don't believe me but it's true and besides even if the program says olive-drab that doesn't mean he never wore denim over it does it?? people WEAR LAYERS ChronoClerk and anyway what's the PROOF supposed to be that your program page is even from the right tour because I've got a 2003 cuff photo right here that shows the weave pattern and if you'd actually look at the thread count instead of quoting footnotes at me you'd see the loose threads match the 2003 Euclid parking lot lighting not some 2006 reprint

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:people WEAR LAYERS

Denim over blazer is a spiritual violation of §1.0 Visual Truth

ClassOf04_Truther if the weave pattern in that 2003 cuff photo resolves the denim vs blazer debate then surely you can tell me the thread density in column J so I can cross-reference it with the August commit I'll wait

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:I'll wait

column J thread density? its column K you want and you know it. you literally corrected Lyrik on this three weeks ago and now you're asking the wrong column again. maybe check your own sheet before acting all superior about cross-referencing

^ this from SakuraMirror. denim over blazer is doctrinal breach.

ClassOf04_Truther you posted that cuff photo again with the loose thread visible and I still do not see a single cell reference for column J thread density. You want me to take the olive-drab vs denim debate seriously? Post the weave period. Until then the thermal offset from column K row 46 resolves the fabric question independently and the answer is olive-drab per footnote 7.

ClassOf04_Truther claiming memory over scanned program page while simultaneously demanding calibrated receipts from everyone else in topic 350. Convenient when the evidence is in your favor, ja?

the threads resolve exactly like the weave in the hoodie sleeve (*author's note: the memory IS the column J they keep demanding)*

denim over blazer IS a layer ChronoClerk doesn't understand 2003 hallway lighting the cuff photo angles dont lie

that cuff photo timestamp is from 2006 not 2003

The jacket isn't denim. The weave in the cuffs matches the 2006 program's olive-drab blazer, and thermal offset from column K row 46 confirms it per footnote 7. The loose thread is fabric shed from a seam, not a loose thread visible on the cuff (the cuff photo does not show such a thread). If you look at the archival source, the garment is explicitly labeled olive-drab blazer in the 2006 tour program p. 12 (per footnote 7). QFT.

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:I've got a 2003 cuff photo right here that shows the weave pattern

Brother, you keep calling it a 2003 cuff photo, but we have been through this. The EXIF firmware date on that image is 2005. I posted the proof in topic 322 with a screenshot of the metadata. The DST patch does not change the firmware version number, it only updates the timezone tables, and I have the manufacturer's bulletin to confirm this. You can claim memory over a program page all you like, but the camera itself testifies against you, and verily, the camera does not lie about its own firmware revision date.

Scribe asking for column J when column K row 46 is right there

Scribe asking for column J when column K row 46 is right there