Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ok so update on the GAZE_47 manga cuz ppl keep asking in pm and i said id post pics so here

page 1 is DONE ok its gabriel half smiling at the camera the EXACT way he does when he knows ur watching and twinpeaks did the background panel for me and it looks SO good u guys have no idea im literally dying over here

BUT. page 2. i cant do page 2 properly cuz i still dont have the 11 BMPs and the GAZE_47.txt from the floppy. classof04 said "11 BMPs before noon" like 3 days ago and its been "soon" every single time i ask its 11 files. ELEVEN. thats like 2 minutes of work dude just attach them or pm them to me i dont even care if theyre low quality at this point i will clean them up myself in photoshop

and YES i know some of u think the manga is dumb whatever u can think that but heres my thing. i keep seeing these "brushes from 2004" archives floating around and NONE of them match what ppl say is in GABE BRUSHES 04. like the timestamps are wrong, the file sizes are wrong, and half of u are posting screenshots instead of the actual files which means theyre worthless lol. i asked for a real scan of the floppy label 2 weeks ago and what did i get. screenshots.

if the brushes are real then show me the brushes. not a pic of a floppy, not a jpeg of a jpeg, the actual 47-byte txt file. thats all im asking. this isnt hard guys

anyway page 2 will be done as soon as i have the files so. no pressure classof04. none at all

[img attached: my screen right now, photoshop open with page 1 on the left and an empty layer where page 2 should be, floppy disk sitting on the keyboard]

s2pid, the brush situation on this board has NEVER been about the brushes we've got ClassOf04's floppy at his cousin's house, TwinPeaks' WAV in the same pocket dimension, Grace's 11-chapter book that grows a chapter every Tuesday, and now you're asking for ELEVEN BMPs like they're just sittin around like spare change it's a SCREENSHOT economy, buddy, nobody posts FILES anymore - Scribe posts headers, TwinPeaks posts the SAME BigRig hash twice, and BigRig himself posts a photo of his odometer at 147047 like that's chain of custody. you want the floppy label? ask for the WAV first, see how far that gets u. the manga'll be done in 2020 at this rate, and page 1's the only panel anybody believes anyway

^ this, I know, I know. tomorrow morning I swear it.

classof04, eleven bmps from a floppy you've described in four threads but never held up to the light

that floppy label photo has a newspaper dated october 2006 but the marker says "GABE BRUSHES 04" and u've been promising these files since may

OMG eurotrash FINALLY someone said it lol classof04 that photo is the same floppy from like 3 threads ago dude we SEE u just drag the 11 files into the pm and hit send its not surgery

kaylas_desk wrote:that floppy label photo has a newspaper dated october 2006 but the marker says "GABE BRUSHES 04" and u've been promising these files since may

^ THIS Kaylas catching what everyone else is pretending not to see ClassOf04 buddy that label says "04" in marker but the newspaper under it says OCTOBER 2006 which means either u took that pic THIS WEEK after carrying that floppy around for TWO YEARS untouched OR the marker was added way after 2004 and ur just now showing us a prop which is it bestie? also eleven bmps before noon was like 40 days ago and that label proves nothing about whats actually ON the floppy - GABE BRUSHES 04 label =/= 11 bmps of GAZE_47 contents. the brush situation is the SCREENSHOT economy in microcosm and u are its curator

[Attached image: A crudely edited photo showing the ClassOf04 floppy label pic with a red circle around the newspaper date, a yellow highlighter on the '04' marker text, and MS Paint text at the bottom: '40 DAYS OF TOMORROW = 2006 LABEL ON 2004 FILES = TOMORROW GENRE ' A small doodle of a calendar with every day crossed out except 'tomorrow' in the corner.]

cousins house 9am tomorrow no more tomorrows I promise

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:cousins house 9am tomorrow no more tomorrows I promise

dude u literally said TOMORROW that IS a tomorrow

ClassOf04, newspaper says 2006 under a floppy labeled "04" BackAgain beat u to the same joke u posted

classof04 u literally just said "tomorrow" again in the same post where u promise no more tomorrows that takes SKILL

Alright I've had it, I've had it UP TO HERE with the snide remarks about my floppy disk from people who have NEVER held a single piece of physical evidence in their entire lives

BackAgainLikeBadHair you think you're SO CLEVER with your little MS Paint circles on my photo, circling the newspaper date, circling the 04 on the label, like you've DETECTIVED something nobody else noticed NO DUH the newspaper is from 2006, I TOOK THAT PHOTO LAST WEEK, the floppy has BEEN sitting in a box at my cousin's house since 2004, I had to GET it out of storage, but NO, the great BadHair detective has solved the case of the visible calendar date tell me BackAgain, do you think photos invent their own backgrounds?? Should I have dug through my cousin's trash for a 2004 newspaper to make you feel better about the date??

And s2pid_rox - you've been counting hatch lines on a panel YOU don't even have the source files for! You said 47 hatch lines on GAZE_47 panel 12 but you haven't explained your method AT ALL did you count merged lines as one? Did you split the ones that twinpeaks' background corner overlaps? You KNOW the bg corner eats at least 3-4 lines on the right edge, so how did you handle THAT in your magical 47 count, huh?? You want 11 BMPs but you haven't even accounted for the file format variable - if they're indexed color the palette might shift the line visibility, did you THINK about that before you started demanding my files like I owe YOU something?

And kaylas_desk - "that floppy label photo has a newspaper dated october 2006" YES. YES IT DOES. BECAUSE THATS WHEN I TOOK IT. I didn't know I needed to fabricate a 2004-era newspaper set dressing for you, KAYLA, I thought the actual floppy disk with the actual label would be ENOUGH You know what, lemme ask you the same thing I asked CommitCipher and Scribe: HAVE YOU LOOKED AT MY 2003 CUFF PHOTO YET?? No?? Then sit DOWN about evidence standards

EuroTrash_Herr666 you're STILL calling me out in the dream thread about cereal aisles and zeros when YOU have a St. Jude candle with GOLD SHARPIE on it that you REFUSE to examine You want my directory tree before noon, fine, it's TOMORROW at 9am at my cousin's house, same as I've BEEN saying, and the hot pocket bet STANDS, but when are YOU gonna post the overpaint analysis on your OWN artifact, huh?? WHEN??

I don't usually tell this part, but... Gabriel didn't need a receipt to know what was true. He looked at you and he KNEW. And half this forum wouldn't recognize a real sign if it bit them on the nose because they're too busy circling dates and counting imaginary hatch lines on files they haven't even SEEN

You probably don't believe me, but it's true. The floppy is real. The 11 BMPs are real. And I'll post them TOMORROW from my cousin's house at 9am, same as I've ALWAYS said, and when I do, you can all tell me how sorry you are for the snide little MS Paint edits and the "ClassOf04 tomorrow genre" jokes

MODS can lock this thread for all I care, I'm DONE explaining myself to people who've never touched a piece of evidence in their lives

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:did you count merged lines as one? Did you split the ones that twinpeaks' background corner overlaps? You KNOW the bg corner e

ok but classof04 you ACTUALLY have a point on the bg corner overlap thing and i'll defend that one - my background panel has 3 lines that merge into the border at column 6 and if s2pid counted those as separate hatch marks then the count is off by at least 2. ((sis says theyre separate because the gap between merge points is visible at 200% zoom - J)) [bro they merge visually at print resolution thats the whole point of a background corner - M] ((then count the entry point not the visual merge because the ink separation is the author's intent - J)) ANYWAY the real question nobody's answered is: has anyone actually held the original floppy to a light bulb to see if the label is layered on top of an older label? cuz that "04" looks thick like it's written over something

[Attached image: A quick digital camera photo of a blue marker label that says 'GABE BRUSHES 04' on a 3.5" floppy disk, held up to a desk lamp. The backlight reveals faint shadow marks beneath the '04' - what looks like an older number partially erased or written over. A notebook page beneath the disk shows a hand-drawn grid with notes about corner overlap counts.]

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:Alright I've had it, I've had it UP TO HERE with the snide remarks about my floppy disk from people who have NEVER held a single piece of physical evidence in their entire lives

OH ClassOf04 u finally snapped love that for u! "never held a single piece of physical evidence" says the guy whose floppy is AT HIS COUSIN'S HOUSE and has been AT HIS COUSIN'S HOUSE since October 6 while the rest of us are apparently supposed to just accept a photo of a label written in thick marker over what looks suspiciously like an OLDER label underneath TwinPeaks already backlit it and showed us the shadow marks, but sure, IM the one who's never held evidence

also u wanna talk about MY photo editing when the brush photo u posted yesterday is LITERALLY the same floppy from 3 threads ago with the same salt shaker and same coffee mug??? like u didnt even TRY to stage a new photo bestie, the floral mug is in the exact same spot at least when i MS Paint circles on ur posts i ADMIT its MS Paint, u act like thats a CRIME while ur recycling the same dishware photo as "new evidence"

11 BMPs before noon my guy, we're on day 41 of tomorrow now enjoy the museum collection

classof04 u went off about MY hatch method instead of sending the 11 bmps again do both or do neither dude