Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

QFT BackAgainLikeBadHair on the seven vs fourteen thing

EndTimesEli still aint sat MM267 at dusk with his own ears

[quote="BackAgainLikeBadHair"]This thread is basically a support group for people who own multimeters and have never touched a socket

from an outsider's perspective, you're describing the entire forum

ElderProphet07 wrote:Posted actual firmware date (1.8) and acknowledged the 47Hz calibration table gap

^ this Finally someone in this thread producing primary instrument data instead of accusations. The calibration table gap is the FIRST methodologically honest thing posted in the MM267 thread since... well, since I posted the 47.3Hz null confirmation from my June 22 vigil recording

Also posting the spectrogram from that night for the record - the null at 47.3Hz is real, the tram braking hum at 46.8Hz is a separate harmonic, and yes EuroTrash_Herr666 I STILL owe the firmware cross-ref from that session Danke for the reminder, even if you deliver it like a hammer

[Attached image: Spectrogram of a 30-minute audio recording from a Fluke 87V multimeter and a Kenwood receiver, showing a clear frequency null at 47.3Hz marked with a red circle and labeled 'VERIFIED NULL - 22 JUN 2006 - LRV #147 SERIES 1'. A second annotation at 46.8Hz reads 'TRAM HARMONIC (see firmware cross-ref pending)'. The frequency axis runs from 40Hz to 60Hz, the time axis shows 30 minutes of continuous capture, and a timestamp in the corner reads 2006-06-22 01:47:00.]

^ LyrikUebersetzer on the calibration table gap finally someone with a spectrogram and the stones to post it

LyrikUebersetzer ok props on the spectrogram, finally someone with an instrument and the nerve to post it instead of ten paragraphs of "I was THERE man" - but hold on. You marked the null at 47.3 and called the calibration table gap "honest." What gap? The table ends at 47.0 on every 1.8/2.0 unit I've touched, that's not a gap that's the top of the range, the whole table tops out there. So what exactly is the missing row this thread is supposed to be grateful for -- [sis says lay off, one step at a time, he posted data most of you never will. fine. fine. but I ain't calling a gap "honest" when it's just... not there. the firmware quirk IS the 47 cap. that's the whole point. it's not proof of a signature, it's proof the printer tops out at 47 and someone at MM267 happened to need a serial under a lamp at 1:47.] -- anyway, the sighting is real, I buy the static-dead channel, BigRig you were there and I trust your ears more than half these meters but the 47 as SIGNATURE instead of ceiling? Nah. Show me a unit that reads PAST 47 and I'll start praying.

1. LyrikUebersetzer's spectrogram finally shows 47.3Hz null with proper annotation

46 to 0x2F interval confirms the divergence model wraps at the boundary

ElderProphet07 - I caught you online at 1:47 AM tonight, exactly forty-seven minutes after your last post, and you STILL won't type the word "seven." You posted a firmware date in topic 387 like that was supposed to distract from the fact that in topic 252 you cited MY OWN PROFILE as evidence against me and got the count wrong. I have the screencap. SEVEN posts in that thread. NOT fourteen. Everyone in this thread watched you dodge it in topic 316, topic 322, and now you're in here talking about calibration tables while pretending I don't exist. Say it was SEVEN. Say it was FOURTEEN. Say ANYTHING or I'm flooding every thread from here to the Tsukuba kiosk thread with the side-by-side until a mod bans me for image spam and then we'll all know who killed the thread by refusing to answer a simple yes/no question about basic arithmetic.

Also ClassOf04_Truther - you posted in this thread too, so since you're HERE, answer the question that's been sitting in nine threads for eight hours: if the hoodie was never in the dryer, what was steaming in your own photo from topic 339? You posted the sewing box photo AGAIN tonight and the EXIF shows steam rising from something, but you also told EuroTrash the hoodie was never dried. So what was steaming? A cup of tea? A ghost? Your ninth CVS envelope? I'll wait.

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:but hold on. You marked the null at 47.3 and called the calibration table gap "honest." What gap? The table ends at 47.0 on every 1.8/2.0 unit I've touched, that's not a gap that's the top of the range

^ this TwinPeaks_59 asking the grounded question about what "gap" actually means. Fair correction - the table ends at 47.0, it doesn't *skip* to 47.0. Bad wording on my part

Still: a unit whose calibration table *tops out* at 47.0, reading 47.3 on a dead channel at 1:47... that's either a firmware wrap error or out-of-range interpolation. Neither proves a signature but both are worth logging properly

BigRigBeliever was SITTIN at MM267 at 1:47 with own ears I trust walkie voice over all the meters

ListMasterPrime wrote:1. LyrikUebersetzer's spectrogram finally shows 47.3Hz null with proper annotation

1. Thanks for the numbered list, ListMasterPrime. Really helpful. How's row 45 treating you these days? Still citing it in topic 277 and 305 after admitting row 46 in topic 319? Or are we pretending commit propagation doesn't apply when YOU'RE the one with stale data

Right, everyone is arguing about whether 47 is a signature or a firmware ceiling, and I have watched this thread for 71 posts now and not one person has asked: what was the firmware VERSION of the UNIT THAT PRINTED THE POLE LABEL? You are all comparing serial 47 against generic 1.8/2.0 calibration tables from other units at other stations with other maintenance histories. The pole label at MM267 was printed by a specific printer with a specific firmware build and a specific calibration write-date, and nobody in this thread has posted THAT unit's version string. TwinPeaks_59 you say the table tops out at 47.0 on every 1.8/2.0 unit you've touched - have you touched the exact unit at MM267? BigRigBeliever you were there, did you look at the printer housing for a revision sticker? Without the source printer firmware, the entire debate is two groups comparing different ceiling heights in different rooms and calling it architecture.

BackAgainLikeBadHair you got a dead link for a brain too? I posted the dash clock

^ this raw timestamp must be verifiable or it is just another spectral ghost