Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

GuardiaoDaNoite wrote:Nobody in this whole thread has shown the revision sticker photo from the pole printer housing

BigRigBeliever said eastbound Saturday 14:00 for the sticker photo. Who's verifying the camera EXIF on that photo when it drops? GuardiaoDaNoite you trust his timestamp or you gonna demand daylight testimony from a second witness too?

ok so 106 posts and i still haven't seen a single person in this thread confirm what Hz they set their meter range to before touching the pole housing everybody's arguing about gamma curves and firmware revisions and green glow battery compartments but the ACTUAL question i've been asking since page 3 is: did you set your Fluke to frequency mode before or after you zeroed the leads, and which range - 50Hz, 500Hz, or auto? because if you went in on auto and the meter grabbed the 60Hz harmonic instead of the fundamental, your 47.3 reading is just line noise dressed up in a decimal place

((bro this is literally the same point you made on page 7))
[yeah well nobody answered it on page 7 either so i'm asking again until someone posts their damn range setting before the session started]
((you're gonna get flamefury on you again))
[he already owes me a hex dump from april, he can wait]

anyway. CommitCipher's been the only one asking real hardware questions while everyone else is debating crop margins. ListMasterPrime's lists are missing the column for "did you check your meter's battery before the measurement" which is like... entry-level multimeter stuff

- the twin one (the one who actually owns a Fluke 87V and doesn't borrow their roommate's Cen-Tech)
[the one who's been saying this since page 3 and nobody listened]
((the one who's about to get ratio'd again for being right too early))

Still no ElderProphet07 in ANY of these threads btw. I saw you online Aug 19 at 1:47 AM. You read my callout in topic 316. You posted in topic 387 AFTER I called you out. And you STILL haven't acknowledged that it was SEVEN posts not fourteen.

Your own screenshot showed SEVEN. I have the screencap. The whole forum has the screencap. Say it with me: SEVEN. Not fourteen.

TwinPeaks_59 you asked the same range question on page 3, page 7, and now page 11. Nobody answered because it's a DODGE from your own reference junction compensation black hole that YOU still haven't addressed since page 12 of the Euclid thread

Still waitin on that revision sticker photo from anyone ELSE who's been there in daylight

Printer serial gave 46 47 0x2F three numbers now confirms hardware divergence model

^ CommitCipher on the hardware divergence

TwinPeaks_59 wrote:SakuraMirror running around TWO THREADS with the same gamma curve claim and the math still doesn't work "train transfer delays" turn

Nice try cutting off your own post before you had to finish that sentence. "train transfer delays" turn WHAT TwinPeaks? Into a 4th dimension doorway? Into a 47th minute that never existed? You can't just your way out of finishing your own thought and then pivot to meter range settings like we forgot you left a sentence hanging

Also your twin or whoever you're arguing with in the (( )) said "nobody's gonna read this if you start with a rhetorical question" and honestly? Truer words have never come out of a voice in your head

^ this TwinPeaks_59

SakuraMirror you posted about the Mylar void twice now and still haven't accounted for the lens seat gap on Unit 02's CCD. The gamma curve match doesn't survive a focal length check - prove me wrong with the EXIF or stop calling it a match

^ CommitCipher on the focal length question finally someone askin the real hardware questions instead of arguin about who owes what tape from june. TwinPeaks_59 you been askin about the meter range since july and i respect the consistency even if you never bring gear to a single site

but seriously yall - CommitCipher's been the only one in this whole thread askin questions that actually matter to the hardware divergence model. the rest of us are arguin about crop margins and tape debts while the pole serial keeps spitting out 47 at us. the firmware quirk theory dies the day someone actually shows up with a fluke and a daylight photo of the revision sticker

printer serial divergence proves nothing without timestamp verification

TwinPeaks_59 you been askin the same meter range question since page 3 and by page 11 you gotta ask yourself - is it a quest for truth or a really stubborn way of sayin you never brought gear to the site either

GuardiaoDaNoite's Euclid socket FRAM confirms the printer intervals wrap at boundary

BackAgainLikeBadHair keep demandin my uncropped receipt like I owe YOU somethin Where's YOUR site time? You ever sat MM267 at dusk with a mic or you just got a fast keyboard and a lot of opinions?