Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

GraceWarrior_77 wrote:three lines i underlined again today - Gabreil 22:9 (or 23, it dont matter)

Oh you can't be serious

You're in the TESTIMONIES board posting "Gabreil 22:9 (or 23 it dont matter)" while THIS thread in DOUBTERS is still waiting for your April hex dump. It's SEPTEMBER. You don't even know what chapter your own made-up scripture is because "it dont matter"

Mods can we lock THIS thread since she clearly won't answer in it and just makes new threads with the same typo instead

Reported for spam honestly. Seven months of whitespace and Gabreil.

triple checked the filter today

GraceWarrior_77 sitting in topic 707 quoting "Gabreil 22:9 (or 23 it dont matter)" while topic 389 still has a 77-post hole where her hex dump should be - and she wants Kael_Vs_Chantayan's avatar checked for width? The sig police have arrived

GraceWarrior_77 still typing Gabreil in September. That's commitment to the wrong letter.

BestBuddyStar wrote:47 47 47 00 = not random = not deflection = EVIDENCE

It is hexadecimal for "G G G [null]", which is a file header, not a miracle. -- GV

LyrikUebersetzer wrote:if the header repeats at offset 0x30 and at 0x00 both as 47 47 47 00 then your "row boundary" mapping is wrong by definition because 0x30 - 0x00 = 0x30 = 48 bytes not 47

LYRIK YOUR SPELLING HERESY IS EXPOSED AGAIN dst NOT DST YOU RUSTYPOD

you know what i love about this thread? it's september. it is objectively september 2006. grace has been promising a hex dump since april. that's five calendar months of 'the light does not argue' while scribe sits here mapping 447 bytes to column k like it's the rosetta stone.

let me explain something to the americans in this thread who think 447 bytes is a discovery. 447 bytes is a floppy disk boot sector fragment. 447 bytes is the size of a corrupted .txt file that someone saved as 'gabriel_proof_final(3)_REAL.txt'. 447 bytes is not a signal from the divine, it is a csv export that truncated at row 47 because the formula in column K returned #REF!

but none of you will hear this because you're all too busy arguing about whether grace's verse is 22:9 or 23 while she types gabreil with an 'ei' like she's german but she's not, she's from ohio. i checked. ohio.

scribes column k obsession is the same energy as the guy at the späti who counts his pfand receipts at 2am. you are not a scholar, scribe, you are a csv theologian who has never touched a socket. row 47 in your spreadsheet is empty. sakura confirmed it. flamefury confirmed it. three other people in this thread confirmed it. you are citing null and calling it revelation.

and grace - page 47 of your notebook is not evidence. it's a doodle. i've been sitting in gölitzer park since april watching the same dog walker circle the same path at the same time and i don't call that a vigil, i call it tuesday. the difference between you and me is i know when i'm wasting time :rolleyes

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:you know what i love about this thread? it's september. it is objectively september 2006. grace has been promising a hex dump since april. that's five calendar months

Five months, FOUR of which had a "Gabreil" typo in them. Let's tally up the September haul so far - it's been like 12 hours since midnight and she's already hit Gabreil 12:4 in topic 708 AND Gabreil 22:9 (or 23) in topic 707. That's two new Gabreils in one day. She's speedrunning the typo now, trying to hit double digits before the month ends.

447 bytes. Forty-seven times three then null. And nobody's asked the real question: if 47 47 47 00 is a signal, what's the null doing there? Null means empty. Null means nothing. Null means your proof terminates in zero, which is fitting because that's exactly how many hex dumps Grace has delivered since April.

But hey, the light does not argue, right? It just sits there at 247px wide and shines. Or was that 447px? I forget, numbers don't matter when you're enlightened.

ScribeOfTheGrid - you mapped 447 bytes to column K row boundaries. Great work. Real scholarship. Now map it to Grace's promise count and see if you get zero. I bet you do. Excel doesn't lie even when people do.

ClassOf04_Truther - you want to bring a loupe to Grace's notebook page? Bro she said "it's either 22:9 or 23, it dont matter." She can't even count chapters and you're offering thread-count analysis. The cuff photo thread count is 47 per inch. So is my sock. So is every cotton weave in existence. That's called standard manufacturing, not a miracle.

GraceWarrior_77 your notebook page 47 is still not a hex dump and repeating "the light does not argue" in every reply since April doesn't magically convert graphite into hexadecimal.

SnowMaiden_1983 you're defending the chapter number like it's a hill to die on while the woman you're backing still can't pick between 22:9 and 23. That's not precision bestie, that's a typo cult.

Page 47 is pulp. Hex dumps are numbers. You have confused a binder with a computer. Get rekt.

GraceWarrior_77 still typing "Gabreil" in September while her hex dump collects dust since APRIL

GraceWarrior_77 Gabreil 23:9 (or 22 it doesnt matter) still waiting for hex dump since april

EuroTrash_Herr666 calling 447 bytes a floppy boot sector fragment is the closest anyone in this thread has come to actually looking at the data instead of the furniture. You're still wrong about the format but at least you glanced at it. GraceWarrior_77 meanwhile still citing page 47 as a hex dump in September

ScribeOfTheGrid you're in the cat thread talking about hidden sheets and August commits but you still haven't answered whether the weave grain angle in my 2003 cuff photo matches your column K row width or not. I posted the macro shot three times now. Four months. That's a yes or no question.

scribes column k formula is sum(k1:k44)/44 which is a basic arithmetic error for a 47-row claim, not a divine pattern. any spreadsheet theologian can divide by 44 and call it revelation

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:GraceWarrior_77 still citing page 47 as a hex dump in September

Six months. Six months of "Gabreil" and notebook pages while the actual archive work sits untouched. I have a full concordance of every public utterance from Gabriel since 2002 gathering dust on a hard drive, and this forum would rather argue about whether Grace's fictional scripture is 22:9 or 23. Yea, verily, the priorities of this fellowship are a wonder to behold.