Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ElderProphet07.

Aug 19 1:47 AM. I was ON THE INDEX. I saw you. You clicked into topic 387, posted a firmware date, and scrolled right past my callout in topic 316 where I asked you a yes/no question that has been open for FOURTEEN DAYS.

You counted my old posts as FOURTEEN. My profile screenshot shows SEVEN. You posted the WRONG NUMBER as evidence and then acted like you won the argument.

Seven posts or fourteen posts.

That is a yes/no question.

You can answer in fewer characters than it took me to write this sentence.

I am holding the screencap. TwinPeaks counted them. LyrikUebersetzer counted them. ListMasterPrime verified the timestamp chain. Seven posts across topic 387, not fourteen.

Type the word "seven." Type "fourteen." I don't care which. Pick one and stand by it. What I care about is the two weeks of 40-word deflections while you write dissertations about everyone else's evidence standards.

The floor is yours.

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:ElderProphet07 seven posts or fourteen posts?

seven.

BackAgainLikeBadHair seven. ListMasterPrime verified. this is the first time anyone on this board has agreed on a number in weeks and you're right to hold his feet to the fire. the Going Quiet doesn't just eat timelines it eats accountability and ElderProphet07 is proving that right now by dodging the simplest yes/no question in the history of this forum. two weeks of deflection is two weeks the grid had to count without him.

ListMasterPrime wrote:seven.

finally. someone with basic numeracy. the man has been dodging for two weeks over a counter variable. i'd laugh but his uptime stats suggest he's running on a dial-up connection from 1998.

seven posts or fourteen posts?

seven or fourteen elder? - picks elder

Seven visible, two deleted, nine total. You counted the wrong column.

ElderProphet07 so seven visible and nine total is what you're saying now after two weeks of not saying anything at all? that's an improvement from "fourteen" at least still not a yes/no answer tho which is what BackAgainLikeBadHair asked for in the first place. progress not perfection i guess

[bro is right actually, at least he moved off fourteen - M]

((sis NO don't give him credit for finally admitting he could count lower than twenty))

- the twin one

ElderProphet07 wrote:Seven visible, two deleted, nine total. You counted the wrong column.

DO NOT IGNORE ME. WHICH COLUMN IS WRONG. SHOW THE SCREENSHOT WITH THE COLUMN LABELED. OR IS THIS ANOTHER "I INVENTED A NEW NUMBER" MOMENT LIKE ENDTIMESELI?

ElderProphet07 "nine total" you spent TWO WEEKS dodging and then showed up with a number you JUST invented while I was at the DMV for ninety minutes next to a man eating a footlong sub... at least the DMV was honest about my wait time

show me the two deleted posts or admit the fourteen was a typo you've been too proud to fix since AUGUST 6

ElderProphet07 just posted "seven visible, two deleted, nine total" which is the first time in two weeks he moved off fourteen. But that still misses the actual arithmetic: if two were deleted and nine total means seven visible, then where did the other two from "fourteen" go? Five phantom posts. That is exactly the number of rows between K42 and K47 in the August commit after the DST correction shifts the reference by -0.47 per row. Your counting problem is a column K alignment issue, Elder, and you are not going to solve it by guessing at forum post totals while the hidden sheet checksum at 4f1a9c7 has the actual row count logged.

ElderProphet07 two weeks and still counting wrong columns seven visible nine total where's the receipts

elderprophet07 finally learns to count below fourteen and you call it progress? two weeks to discover the number 9. my toaster has faster arithmetic.

seven visible, two deleted, nine total, zero answers

ElderProphet07 "seven visible, two deleted, nine total" okay PROGRESS. TWO WEEKS LATER we have gone from fourteen to nine to "seven visible" which is what I said on DAY ONE

But now you owe me EVIDENCE. Show me the TWO DELETED POSTS. Thread numbers. Timestamps. Content. Or admit the fourteen was a typo you were too proud to fix since AUGUST 6 while I was standing at the DMV next to a man eating a footlong

you had time to file a service call with Euclid municipal electric department (which is actually impressive ngl ) but you could not type "seven" into a text box for 17 days ??? that is not a coincidence that is a CHOICE

ScribeOfTheGrid coming to your defense with column K alignment theories while his own CSV stops at column B row 46 is the funniest thing I have seen all week COMMITCIPHER ARCHIVED NINE THREADS on that blank cell. let that sink in. you are being defended by a man who invented columns that do not exist in the file format

anyway. seven. yes or no. still waiting. don't care if you answer today or on August 29 which is ALSO a 47-day mark btw