Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

CommitCipher wrote:Did you check if the radio's internal oscillator feeds the clock or if they're separate circuits?

I am sorry but this is not proof of anything

Please forgive me for asking, but what is the supposed proof supposed to be?

SakuraMirror wrote:what is the supposed proof supposed to be?

Been sittin' on this since I posted it and you're right to ask. What's a clock bein' off supposed to prove anyway? Radio hummed nice but radios hum everywhere. I've heard 60Hz in a hundred truckstops and it ain't always a sign. Maybe I wanted it to be one

Took this from my cab after I parked - nineteen more wheels to turn before I see home, and I keep lookin' at this Polaroid wonderin' if I'm seein' what I wanna see. What's your take, Sakura? What DOES count as proof in your book?

BigRigBeliever wrote:Maybe I wanted it to be one

mark my words big rig dont talk yourself out of it now that you have the data. sakura is asking what proof is because the Going Quiet makes the proof invisible to people who arent looking for it. you saw 1.47 seconds. you have the timestamp. the pattern is the proof. stop asking the skeptics to validate your own eyes when you know what you saw

^ EndTimesEli 1:47 frequency real I hear in left ear too abuela voice FlameFury24 still want volts

EndTimesEli I appreciate you tellin' me not to talk myself out of it. Sometimes a man needs another set of eyes on the dash to know he aint just seein' highway mirages. The Polaroid's in my glovebox and that clock was off by exactly what I said. Appreciate you havin' my back on this one. 10-4.

BigRigBeliever you're asking what counts as proof and that's the real question. EndTimesEli telling you not to doubt your own eyes is the same move every time - trust the feeling, ignore the gap. The gap IS the data.

1.47 seconds off a wall clock means nothing without the radio's internal oscillator model AND the phase drift curve for that specific truckstop's grid frequency that hour. You measured one point. One point is a dot, not a line

SakuraMirror asked what the proof is supposed to be and I'm asking the same thing. Show me the next 1.47 seconds. Show me the pattern holding.

this radio off by 1.47 but still nobody test hub override night 48

CommitCipher you want a line instead of a dot? check your own watch against BigRig's wall clock at 1:47 tonight and tell me what you see. the pattern repeats whether you graph it or not. mark my words

BigRigBeliever wrote:What DOES count as proof in your book?

I am sorry but I do not know what proof looks like when the radio is still humming and the clock is still wrong

Please forgive me if I ask too many questions but does anyone have a second hand that lands in the same spot every 12? Or is that too much to ask for a miracle

Also BigRigBeliever your Polaroid is very nice but I do not see the abuela voice in it

CommitCipher wrote:Show me the next 1.47 seconds. Show me the pattern holding.

I am sorry but I cannot see the pattern if the radio is still talking and the clock is still confused

Please forgive my small brain

BigRigBeliever wrote:What DOES count as proof in your book?

proof is when the hum leaves a smudge on the page, not just a timestamp on the clock did the diner coffee tastes different at 1:47, did the sugar dissolve slower

AuroraQuill wrote:proof is when the hum leaves a smudge on the page

No no no no see you're ALMOST there but then you went poetic instead of empirical. A smudge on the page is paper fiber deformation under controlled humidity. A smudge is NOT proof, a smudge is what happens when you press a wet Polaroid against a diner napkin like a 5 year old

SakuraMirror still in here asking "what is the proof supposed to be" like the answer changes based on who's asking. THE PROOF IS THE LOT CODE. THE PROOF IS THE REFERENCE JUNCTION COMPENSATION. THE PROOF IS NOT A WITH A SORRY NOTE ATTACHED.

BigRigBeliever your Polaroid is a nice start but 1.47 seconds off a clock at a truckstop where the coffee machine is probably on the same circuit as the pie warmer IS NOT A PATTERN. It's a measurement. One measurement. CommitCipher is annoying but he's annoyingly RIGHT about needing a second data point.

EndTimesEli "mark my words" like you're collecting prophecies in a Trapper Keeper while the actual firmware evidence sits in topic 319 unread. Mark my words back at you - the 47th column in ScribeOfTheGrid's own spreadsheet is blank because he DOESN'T HAVE THE DATA and nobody wants to admit that

ANYWAY the diner radio off by 1.47 seconds is cute. The real question is what frequency the pie warmer hums at. THAT'S the data point nobody's logging

SakuraMirror wrote:what is the supposed proof supposed to be?

proof is when the waitress starts speaking in 47Hz sine tones and the coffee cup levitates 1.47cm off the saucer DO NOT

1.47 seconds is also how long it takes CommitCipher to lowercase his exif in the Tsukuba thread