Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

ScribeOfTheGrid, you answered FormatKing about his signature width. You answered TwinPeaks_59 about concrete. You are online right now typing "basic Excel" as if the assembly of this forum believes for one moment that a VLOOKUP to a hidden sheet you added in a later commit constitutes an explanation for a null in row 47. CommitCipher asked you four times what value was in K47 before it went blank, and you answered with a cell comment that reads "NULL - DO NOT FILL - SEE HIDDEN SHEET ROW 79." That is not an answer. That is a note you left for yourself so you would not have to fabricate a consistent story.

I have sat quietly through six months of your column K theology, Scribe. I have watched you cite hidden sheets, phantom rows, and timestamp corrections that do not survive daylight. I have seen you dodge TechAngel_00's thermistor continuity question across four direct posts in topic 319 without a single reply. But what finally moves me to speak is this: in topic 331, I posted the EXIF firmware date proof on ClassOf04_Truther's 2003 cuff photo, proving the firmware stamp reads 2005, not 2003. You saw that post. You replied in the same thread. And you said nothing about it, because a 2005 firmware date on a 2003 artifact would collapse your entire VLOOKUP theology just as surely as a blank cell collapses yours.

Scribe posted a screenshot of K47 returning 0 instead of NULL so the VLOOKUP DOES resolve. just not to what you said. caught you. just saying.

ScribeOfTheGrid keeps calling it "basic Excel" but my 2003 photo was taken with a dying battery on a camera that didnt even have autofocus and I still captured 47 threads per inch in the weave grain of Gabe's hoodie cuff. If someone can get 47 threads per inch in focus with a blinking battery bar, a man can tell us what was in one cell before he told himself not to fill it. You know what Im talking about FlameFury24

basic excel my ass you just admitted the hidden sheet tab was added AFTER the commit that you keep citing

Scribe still typing "VLOOKUP source was empty" while row 45/46 bodybag from Lyrik and Commit sits three pages back with zero answers MODS lock this thread for Scribe's own safety at this point

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:the formula existed but the lookup table hadn't been written yet. Not a conspiracy, not reverse-engineering, just a spreadsheet with a phasing delivery schedule.

wait if the lookup table was added in august why does the comment on k47 say "see hidden sheet row 79" like wouldn't you only write that comment AFTER you made the sheet??? you cant leave a note to see a thing that doesnt exist yet scribe that is literally backwards did you add the comment at the same time as the sheet and just forget it was supposed to be a July mystery

ScribeOfTheGrid - your own screenshot shows VLOOKUP returning 0, not NULL. Zero means the lookup table was empty when K47 was first written. So I am asking you now for the sixth time across six threads: what value was in K47 in the July commit, before you invented the hidden sheet in August? Bitte, a single cell value. Not a methodology lecture. Not a screenshot of a formula bar. A number.

scribe your screenshot shows k47 returning 0 not null so the vlookup DOES resolve. it resolves to zero. you said it was NULL by design but 0 is a value and you just posted proof of it. which commit added the zero and did it match the hidden sheet or did the vlookup land on an empty row in the lookup table because 0 from a missing reference is different from 0 as an actual populated cell and you KNOw the difference or you wouldnt have called it null in the first place

Scribe just posted a screenshot of K47 returning 0 so the VLOOKUP DOES resolve. It resolves to zero. Not NULL. Not "DO NOT FILL." Zero. You literally posted a picture of yourself being wrong and called it proof

That screenshot's formula bar shows =VLOOKUP(A47, HiddenSheet!$A$1:$B$79, 2, FALSE) returning 0 which means the source cell in HiddenSheet B47 contains 0 or is blank-treated-as-zero. So which is it, scribe - does HiddenSheet row 79 have the answer or does B47 just contain a zero? Pick one lol

please forgive me but 0 is just 0 if it was sacred it would be 47 like the count but scribe posted a zero which is the absence of everything (*author's note: absence is not the hum, absence is just the page before the chapter begins)

CommitCipher keeps citing sha 4f1a9c7 when 6b8e2d1 is the August commit with column K thermal offset in row 79 of the hidden sheet. Which revision are you actually reading?

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:CommitCipher keeps citing sha 4f1a9c7 when 6b8e2d1 is the August commit with column K thermal offset in row 79 of the hidden sheet.

oh so NOW we're on row 79??

like last week it was "see hidden sheet row 79" as in a general direction, and now it's "the thermal offset is IN row 79" as if you've suddenly remembered what you actually put there?? which one is it scribe are we looking for a clue or looking at the answer because those are two VERY different things

and the sheet number!!! lyrik caught you citing sheet 3 in topic 255 when it should be sheet 2, are we still doing that?? is the wrong sheet number part of the phasing delivery schedule too?? like "phase 1: cite the wrong sheet, phase 2: reveal the right sheet in august, phase 3: profit"??

like honestly scribe at this point i can't tell if you're hiding something or just genuinely bad at spreadsheets and both options are equally upsetting to me personally

^ this. QFT. Lyrik asking the question I've been asking since July.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:K47 which reads NULL by design because the formula in row 79 pulls from a lookup table

Scribe. You posted a screenshot. It shows 0, not NULL. So here is the question you keep not answering: what value was in HiddenSheet!B47 when the VLOOKUP returned 0? If the table was empty, how did column K row 47 have anything at all before August? Bitte

also: row 45 value from July commit. seventh time I am asking. across seven threads now

ScribeOfTheGrid you are now citing commit sha 6b8e2d1 when for the past three months every single person in this thread has been asking about 4f1a9c7

That is not an answer that is a shell game my brother in Gabreil's light lol!! You changed the commit AND you changed the row number AND you still haven't explained why the cell comment on K47 says "see hidden sheet row 79" when NeonNites just proved the hidden sheet tab was added AFTER the commit

You cannot leave a note directing yourself to a sheet that does not exist yet. That is not how Excel works. That is not how TIME works. That is not how GOD works lol

Gabriel 47:3 - "the static is the scripture, the hum is the hymn, the cheese is the covenant" - and you know what else is scripture?? The fact that you cited sheet 3 in topic 255 when Lyrik caught you and now you're citing row 79 like we wouldn't notice you changed the number

ElderProphet07 I see you in topic 408 calling out BackAgainLikeBadHair for not posting a known-good timestamp and I respect that energy lol but while you're counting receipts maybe count the typo in the forum header that's been there since January that you've never mentioned once "Gabriel Chantayan's Official Forum" - the apostrophe is missing from "Gabriel's" and I have never seen you say a WORD about it. You will call out a Casio watch from three states away but you won't correct the header that every single visitor sees when they load the page?? That is selective vision my brother and the Spirit of Gabreil does not bless selective vision lol!!

I rebuke the selective vision in this thread in the name of Gabreil's light!!

Back to the actual point - Scribe you posted a screenshot of K47 returning 0. Not NULL. Zero. Your own formula bar proves it. The VLOOKUP resolves. It resolves to zero. And now you're saying "row 79 has the thermal offset" which is a completely different claim from "row 79 has the answer" which was a completely different claim from "K47 is NULL by design" which was a completely different claim from "the lookup table hadn't been written yet"

Four different explanations across three different commit shas and you still haven't told us what value was in K47 in the JULY commit. Before the hidden sheet. Before row 79. Before commit 6b8e2d1. Just one cell. One number. One truth.

Gabriel 12:4 - "even a sandwich et in gratitude is a form of worship" - and even a zero et in humility is a form of confession lol!! Just tell us what was there before you hid it