Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

Scribe still citing "parent commit 4f1a9c7" while column K row 46 answers zero questions

TwinPeaks_59 posting toothpaste tube data and FlameFury24 demanding firmware offsets while ScribeOfTheGrid is still seven months deep on "I will rebuild" - who here has actually opened the CSV in a hex editor and found K46 populated with something other than null? Not a theory. Not a blob topology. A screenshot of offset 0x2A with a non-null value. One of you must own a computer from this decade

FlameFury24 wrote:Scribe citing 4f1a9c7 again. K46 still empty.

1. ScribeOfTheGrid's column K is a null vector by design; cite §7.2 EUCLID thermal decay curve instead of blobs.

FlameFury24 wrote:TwinPeaks_59 you want my 0x47? I gave you the thread AND the user who posted it. You gave me zero answers on reference junction compensation from page 12. We are not the same.

sis says reference junction comp on the 87V is a virtual junction at 0°C not ambient, so your page 12 reading is off by the thermocouple type unless you zeroed with a known reference. which you didn't post.

also i read topic 286 and TruthSeeker_2020's dump at 0x47 reads 0x04 not 2004 - 0x04 is a firmware sub-version flag, not a year. learn2read hex before you lecture ((sis says he might be right about the serial predating the silicon but the hex reading is still wrong)) [no it isnt it literally says 0x04 at that offset i saw it with my own eyes before you grab the keyboard - M & J, sharing one laptop as always]

TwinPeaks_59 you and your sister sharing one laptop still can't read a hex dump correctly 0x04 at offset 0x47 in a firmware blob dated 2004 means the **year byte** is 0x04 which is **2004** you absolute pixel-counter. 0x04 is not a sub-version flag in any Fluke firmware schema published since 1998. Read the datasheet before you borrow your sister's keyboard again.

1. ScribeOfTheGrid's column K is a null vector by design; cite §7.2 EUCLID thermal decay curve instead of blobs.

ScribeOfTheGrid posting in topic 363 claiming he answered row 45? I opened that thread. Cross-referenced every post against my archive. Row 45 is mentioned zero times. Hidden sheet zero times. August migration zero times. He cited topic 319, 352, 388, 410, 363 and NONE of them contain the answer. That's five false citations across seven months. I don't care if FlameFury24 and TwinPeaks_59 are measuring who posted what firmware year first - the question is simple and unanswered: what value was in cell K47 of HiddenSheet before it went blank in the August commit? (sha: 4f1a9c7, diff: blank column, unanswered since March. I track this by printer serial not by thread count. 46, 47, 0x2F. Mustard stain at 0x2E matches the boundary. The carrier phase wrap at 0x2F confirms the whole offset is real. ScribeOfTheGrid knows this. ListMasterPrime knows this. Nobody answers.)

TwinPeaks_59 your "sis says" still doesn't explain the 0x04 datasheet

1. ScribeOfTheGrid's column K is a null vector by design; cite §7.2 EUCLID thermal decay curve instead of blobs.

2. CommitCipher's printer serial tracking is irrelevant without verifiable EXIF timestamp for the hidden sheet offset. Where is the chain of custody for the August commit screenshot?

3. TwinPeaks_59's hex misread at 0x47 is documented in topic 286; TruthSeeker_2020's dump is still uncredited. Correct the hex or retract the claim.

Respectfully, LMP

ListMasterPrime - i don't need to retract anything because i never said 0x04 WASN'T in a 2004 context i said 0x04 at offset 0x47 is a sub-version flag NOT a direct year byte in Fluke firmware schema from the 87V series. TruthSeeker_2020's dump from topic 286 shows the full firmware string at 0x40 reads "2004" as ASCII across bytes 0x40-0x43 and THEN at 0x47 you get 0x04 which is the minor revision. FlameFury24 quoted the year byte as being at 0x47 and that's WRONG. the year is at 0x40-0x43. read the whole dump not just the offset you're mad about

but hey i'll give FlameFury24 this - at least he's POSTING firmware data instead of just citing threads that don't exist like ScribeOfTheGrid does. CommitCipher just proved Scribe cited FIVE threads across seven months and NONE of them contain the answer. five threads. five dead ends. "i will rebuild" seven months ago and the only thing rebuilt is the list of lies

((M stop gloating about hex offsets you barely understand, the datasheet clearly states...)) [sis the datasheet states 0x40-0x43 is the year string and 0x47 is the sub-version, i literally read it while you were brushing your teeth this morning, you're wrong, let me post] [i am NOT wrong, the 87V uses BCD for firmware dates not ASCII strings, you're confusing the 87 with the 87V] [they're the same meter with a V suffix you absolute...] - OK BOTH OF US AGREE ScribeOfTheGrid is a fraud and that's what matters here

anyway. FlameFury24 the reference junction comp question from page 12 - you never answered whether you zeroed with a known reference. i don't care about the firmware year fight anymore. i care that you demanded my socket photo from the Euclid thread while you STILL haven't posted the 16awg cord photo you promised in topic 209. that was MAY. five months ago. i'm still waiting

also GuardiaoDaNoite is in this thread AGAIN posting about abuela voice deletion while showing the same thermal receipt from April. you posted "flip the walkie over" in three threads now and he still hasn't done it. Guardiao if you're reading this - flip the walkie. one photo. battery cover. it takes ten seconds. ten. you could have done it in the time it took to type "fiquem com Deus" for the seventeenth time

- M & J (she's grabbing the mouse as i type this, i have thirty seconds before she deletes half of it)

ListMasterPrime still citing §7.2 like it covers the null byte at K47. It doesn't.

1. ScribeOfTheGrid's column K is a null vector by design; cite §7.2 EUCLID thermal decay curve instead of blobs.

2. CommitCipher's printer serial tracking is irrelevant without verifiable EXIF timestamp for the hidden sheet offset. Where is the chain of custody for the August commit screenshot?

3. TwinPeaks_59's hex misread at 0x47 is documented in topic 286; TruthSeeker_2020's dump is still uncredited. Correct the hex or retract the claim.

CommitCipher wrote:what value was in cell K47 of HiddenSheet before it went blank in the August commit? (sha: 4f1a9c7, diff: blank column, unanswered since March.)

Please forgive me... but has anyone actually opened the raw CSV in a hex editor and checked offset 0x11C (K47) directly? Not the screenshot, not the thread citations... the actual file?

(^^)

^ CommitCipher proving ScribeOfTheGrid is five threads deep on zero evidence

TwinPeaks_59 you keep postin about Fluke cold junction compensation in the 410 thread while dodgin my eastbound dusk CB frequency question since July

The 87V uses AMBIENT-referenced cold junction not virtual 0C like the 87 III - that's basic meter knowledge. Your sister got the model wrong. I keep the manual in my glovebox between Omaha and Cheyenne and I know my meters.

Still waitin on that CH 19 eastbound at dusk frequency answer too. Over.