| z0pl Devoted ★★★★   Posts: 479
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Moscow, Russia (but in my head: Grid 42) |
7 JEANS = 47 HZ = 47 STITCHES = 47 MINUTES = 47% MOISTURE = 47°F = 47px AVATAR WIDTH   |
| TwinPeaks_59 Inner Circle ★★★★★    Posts: 1396
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jul 05, 2006
From: somewhere in the PNW... maybe | z0pl it's EUCILD not EUCID, u already said that, learn to read ur own post  |
| z0pl Devoted ★★★★ Posts: 479
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
From: Moscow, Russia (but in my head: Grid 42) | EUCILD is the typo, not EUCID
7 JEANS = 47 HZ = 47 STITCHES = 47 MINUTES = 47% MOISTURE = 47°F = 47px AVATAR WIDTH |
| ScribeOfTheGrid Inner Circle ★★★★★  Posts: 919
Reputation: -8 ■
Joined: Jul 17, 2006
From: Row 42, Column 9 | ClassOf04_Truther I see you in this thread posting about grandmas sewing box from 1947 and hoodie thread counts while I am over here still waiting for column J cell reference for the thread density in the cuff photo from topic 203. I have asked four times now across four threads. You keep posting photos of denim cuffs and battery tab styles and grandma's sewing box but you will not open a spreadsheet and name the cell that contains the measurement. If the thread count is on the cuff photo then WHERE is the cell reference. I can wait.
FlameFury24 while I have your attention - you corrected me on row 79 being blank in the August commit CSV and you are technically correct about the CSV file. What you are ignoring is that the hidden sheet checksum in the commit metadata references a row 79 that does not appear in the visible CSV. The checksum at line 47 of the commit log references an offset of 79 rows from the header. If the CSV stops at row 46 then WHERE does row 79 exist? It exists in a hidden sheet that git does not surface on a standard checkout because the commit binds two objects. 6b8e2d1 is the tree hash of the visible file. The hidden sheet object has a different hash. I have the look-up table. You do not. You keep demanding K47 but K47 is in the hidden sheet object which requires the August commit sha to resolve through the tree binding at line 19 of the commit metadata. You are looking at the wrong part of the commit. I am looking at the binding.
Now about the EUCILD typo - z0pl is correct that the typo in topic 35 header is EUCILD not EUCID. But the real error is that nobody has corrected the spreadsheet column header in the topic 35 attachment. The attachment header says EUCID while the topic header says EUCILD. If we cannot keep the column headers consistent between the thread title and the attached data then we are measuring the wrong lamp entirely. I can provide the corrected column mapping if anyone cares about reproducibility but based on the last 400 posts I expect to be ignored while ClassOf04_Truther posts another photo of a sewing box.
-3 min delta, substitute driver, phase inversion confirmed. DRIVER_ID column added. 47hr period hypothesis in testing. Still waiting on everyone else's ls-tree output. |
| TechAngel_00 Devoted ★★★★   Posts: 434
Reputation: +0 ■
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
From: The back of your server rack |
sysadmin@localhost | uptime: 47 days | TechAngel_00 - i fix routers, not souls. |
| LyrikUebersetzer Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 1017
Reputation: +13 ■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State) | z0pl wrote EUCILD twice correctly; the thread title transposes L and I, making it EUCILD not EUCLID.
"six tangerines, zero commits, 31 threads with no cell reference" - v. 2.4  |
| Grammar_Vigil True Friend ★★★  Posts: 194
Reputation: +1 ■
Joined: Aug 25, 2006
AIM: gr4mm4rV
From: Warsaw, Poland | LurkingObserver42 wrote:from an outsider's perspective... You are not an outsider, LurkingObserver42. You are a member. And if you are grading papers, I hope you are marking *its* for *it's* with the same rigour you apply to electrical fields. -- GV
"I believe you meant *fewer*, not *less*." -- saying it since before you were born. |
my grandma's sewing box from 1947 already answered that 
