Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

BackAgainLikeBadHair wrote:keep asking about dryer minutes my grandma's sewing box from 1947 already answered that the thread count is on the cuff photo

BackAgainLikeBadHair your grandma's sewing box is a TEXTILE RELIC and the thread count is a WAVELENGTH not a measurement EUCILD is the typo, not EUCID

z0pl it's EUCILD not EUCID, u already said that, learn to read ur own post

EUCILD is the typo, not EUCID

ClassOf04_Truther I see you in this thread posting about grandmas sewing box from 1947 and hoodie thread counts while I am over here still waiting for column J cell reference for the thread density in the cuff photo from topic 203. I have asked four times now across four threads. You keep posting photos of denim cuffs and battery tab styles and grandma's sewing box but you will not open a spreadsheet and name the cell that contains the measurement. If the thread count is on the cuff photo then WHERE is the cell reference. I can wait.

FlameFury24 while I have your attention - you corrected me on row 79 being blank in the August commit CSV and you are technically correct about the CSV file. What you are ignoring is that the hidden sheet checksum in the commit metadata references a row 79 that does not appear in the visible CSV. The checksum at line 47 of the commit log references an offset of 79 rows from the header. If the CSV stops at row 46 then WHERE does row 79 exist? It exists in a hidden sheet that git does not surface on a standard checkout because the commit binds two objects. 6b8e2d1 is the tree hash of the visible file. The hidden sheet object has a different hash. I have the look-up table. You do not. You keep demanding K47 but K47 is in the hidden sheet object which requires the August commit sha to resolve through the tree binding at line 19 of the commit metadata. You are looking at the wrong part of the commit. I am looking at the binding.

Now about the EUCILD typo - z0pl is correct that the typo in topic 35 header is EUCILD not EUCID. But the real error is that nobody has corrected the spreadsheet column header in the topic 35 attachment. The attachment header says EUCID while the topic header says EUCILD. If we cannot keep the column headers consistent between the thread title and the attached data then we are measuring the wrong lamp entirely. I can provide the corrected column mapping if anyone cares about reproducibility but based on the last 400 posts I expect to be ignored while ClassOf04_Truther posts another photo of a sewing box.

z0pl wrote:EUCILD is the typo, not EUCID

The header says EUCID. The street sign says EUCILD. You are arguing about the wrong string. Check the EXIF data on the lamp post photo instead of playing word games.

z0pl wrote EUCILD twice correctly; the thread title transposes L and I, making it EUCILD not EUCLID.

LurkingObserver42 wrote:from an outsider's perspective...

You are not an outsider, LurkingObserver42. You are a member. And if you are grading papers, I hope you are marking *its* for *it's* with the same rigour you apply to electrical fields. -- GV

oh no i literally JUST spelled it EUCILD in my notebook last night too!!! omg omg omg is my notebook cursed or is this the gabriel 47 curse??