Board index » the sign-reversal pattern in my wake-up times and why ClassOf04_Truther should care

ScribeOfTheGrid
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust Euclid
Posts: 919
Reputation: -8
Joined: Jul 17, 2006
From: Row 42, Column 9
ClassOf04_Truther you've been sitting on topic 203's cuff photo for four months with zero cell references while I have PROOF that the 4-minute offset pattern flipped sign between yesterday and today. B2 = +4, today = -4. This is a mirror in the data. If you'd ever actually opened commit 6b8e2d1 you'd see column K handles sign reversals via thermal offset - same methodology applies to wake-time residuals. My cafeteria receipt confirms the 4 is structural, not noise. When are you posting the thread count measurement from column J?

-3 min delta, substitute driver, phase inversion confirmed. DRIVER_ID column added. 47hr period hypothesis in testing. Still waiting on everyone else's ls-tree output.
MamaBear_2006
Departed
★★★★
147witness50HzEuclidTruthCord Or Bust Euclid
Posts: 481
Reputation: +14 ■■
Joined: Jul 29, 2006
From: Right behind you, sweetie
ScribeOfTheGrid still citing row 47 like it means something while the actual commit graph shows zero thermal folder, and you have never opened sha 8c3f9a4 because if you did you would see the empty column K yourself :dumb:

MamaBear_2006 - Still counting posts while you count threads. Sept 12 Euclid trip: Fluke 87V + Gabe-ables. Someone bring the actual socket. :147witness: :50HzEuclidTruth:
DennisFromOhio
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 653
Reputation: +12 ■■
Joined: Jun 14, 2006
From: Ohio, USA
ScribeOfTheGrid you keep posting about sign reversals and column K and thermal offsets and wake-time residuals and you want ClassOf04_Truther to care :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

But I gotta ask you somethin first.

You said in topic 319 that the August 6 commit offset is at row 45. I checked it myself last week. Its row 46. I counted three times. :banghead: :banghead:

So if you cant even get the row number right on the commit you keep linkin in every thread why should ClassOf04_Truther open column J for you :dumb: :dumb: :dumb:

You keep tellin people to prove you wrong but you been wrong about row 45 since July and you never corrected it. Not once. Not even a "my bad I meant 46" :rolleyes:

Fix your row count before you tell others to open their columns.

Regards,
DennisFromOhio

:deadhorse: :deadhorse: :deadhorse:

shoebox full of grandpas photos and a reel tape that wont spin - thats my september in a nutshell :D
ScribeOfTheGrid
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witnessCord Or Bust Euclid
Posts: 919
Reputation: -8
Joined: Jul 17, 2006
From: Row 42, Column 9
DennisFromOhio you counted the CSV body start at row 46 and I agree the data entries begin there, but the COMMIT OFFSET in the git log is row 45 because the header row isn't a data point - it's metadata. That's two different counting systems and you keep conflating them. My question is: what tool did you use to count? If it was a CRT ruler you owe the thread a calibration reference because your eyes arent NIST-traceable :rolleyes:

-3 min delta, substitute driver, phase inversion confirmed. DRIVER_ID column added. 47hr period hypothesis in testing. Still waiting on everyone else's ls-tree output.
ClassOf04_Truther
Inner Circle
★★★★★
147witness
Posts: 868
Reputation: +6
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
From: Somewhere Gabriel knows
a whole thread titled at me and you still wont acknowledge the weave grain? :rofl: :dumb: :dumbbravo:

A close-up macro photo of a denim hoodie cuff laid flat on a wooden sewing table. A yellow sewing tape measure crosses diagonally over the fabric showing inch markings. Small red hand-drawn arrows point to individual blue threads. A handwritten sticky note in the corner reads '47 tpi - Euclid 2003'

2003 cuff photo still unopened since July - 40+ threads and counting! cat photobomb included free of charge :D :D :D 147 tpi weave evidence or i didnt happen :moonwalk: