| FlameFury24 Inner Circle ★★★★★      Posts: 1490
Reputation: +9 ■
Joined: May 15, 2006
From: The Inferno Pit, USA | @LyrikUebersetzer - You're still posting footfall correlations when you got banned from AudiophileForums in 2004 for overlaying waveform data that wasn't yours?  I remember that post where you claimed a 0.33s window and the mods found the original WAV was actually a sped-up recording of a microwave door closing. Get rekt. @CommitCipher the DST gap theory holds because Lyrik's "calibrated" audio device was the same one he used to record his "47Hz toaster" testimony and we all saw how that turned out  @ListMasterPrime if you're gonna cite row 45 one more time after the August 6 commit moved the thermal offset to row 46 I'm gonna post that screenshot so hard your spreadsheet crashes.
"the hash of nothing is still a hash" - ScribeOfTheGrid, topic 1329, 1306, 1628, 1742, and his own column K  |
| LyrikUebersetzer Inner Circle ★★★★★   Posts: 1016
Reputation: +13 ■■
Joined: Jun 20, 2006
From: München, Germany (exchange student @ Ohio State) | ListMasterPrime - thank you. Someone finally read the variance window correctly instead of calling it a paintjob. The ±0.33s figure was derived from the cross-correlation peak width between the S400 shutter click transient and the 47.3Hz carrier null onset in my RTA log (LRV #147, Series 1, timestamp 19:04:12.41). I applied the UTC-4 to UTC-5 correction before computing the lag, not after - so the DST gap theory collapses before it even reaches the spreadsheet. CommitCipher can keep citing sha tags like they are citations but a git hash is not a measurement.
"six tangerines, zero commits, 31 threads with no cell reference" - v. 2.4  |
| CharcoalSoul_88 Departed ★★★★  Posts: 287
Reputation: -2 ■
Joined: Jul 26, 2006
From: Art school, top floor, near the dusty windows |
drawing the hollow in his eyes until the paper tears |
