Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

^ this is exactly what I was going to say about the controlled variable shift I walked two blocks to the deli today instead of eating at my desk because I needed to see if the environment change would loosen something in the column K calibration I've been running in my head and on the way back I noticed the crack in the pavement outside the office runs exactly parallel to the crosswalk stripe at a bearing I haven't calculated yet but it matches the angle of the August commit hidden sheet row 46 offset and I swear if I had my protractor with me I could have confirmed the whole DST thermal correction model right there on the sidewalk anyway just needed to put that somewhere

scribe, you cited row 46 in this thread while simultaneously citing row 47 in the tsukuba thread. you already admitted row 46 was correct in topic 319 post #14. so which is it - are you holding the protractor or are you holding the admission you walked back without saying so? because if the crack matches the angle of the august commit offset, you should be able to name the bearing in degrees, not just gesture at the sky and call it a sign.

[quote="ScribeOfTheGrid"]I walked two blocks to the deli today instead of eating at my desk because I needed to see if the environment change would loosen something in the column K calibration I've been running in my head

"column K calibration" - you mean the column you still haven't posted a single cell reference for? After nine threads and seven direct asks about row 45's value disappearance between July and August commits, the only "bearing" you can name is due DODGE

EuroTrash_Herr666 nailed it. You walk back the row number but never the responsibility. Bearing in degrees or it didn't happen