Friends of Gabriel Chantayan

so I was digging through my hall closet today... looking for that one photo I knew existed and I FINALLY found it it's from the 2003 fall festival, the one where Gabe wore that gray hoodie with the loose thread on the left cuff... I don't usually tell this part but I remember him standing by the cotton candy machine and the way the light hit his shoulder... anyway the point is the EXIF date on this proves my timeline was RIGHT and Scribe you can put that in your column K and smoke it

attaching the scan below - look at the cuff threads, look at the angle of his shadow, tell me again about your spreadsheet rows

ClassOf04_Truther finally bringing heat Scribe can keep his hidden third sheet fantasy while you're actually posting artifacts from the physical world

ClassOf04_Truther your scan just buried Scribe's column K fantasy

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:look at the cuff threads, look at the angle of his shadow, tell me again about your spreadsheet rows

Four months of cuff photos and still no cell reference for the thread count. What's the pixel measurement between the loose thread and the cuff seam? What's the EXIF shutter speed so we can confirm the shadow angle isn't just motion blur at 1/15?

You could resolve the entire 47-count debate with three numbers from that photo file and instead you posted a scan

EXIF date is WRONG ClassOf04_Truther your cuff photo is either a forgery or a time-traveling miracle

Four months of cuff photos and still no controlled thread count measurement or purchase provenance.

scribe asking for pixel measurements while his own csv has a phantom row 79 that he admitted in topic 413 was a fabrication. classof04_truther, your cuff photo proves nothing without a firmware date on the camera that captured it. z0pl taught me that much - his fluke is from 2003 with no dst patch, but at least he owns a meter. you own a scan of a closet find.

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Four months of cuff photos and still no cell reference for the thread count. What's the pixel measurement between the loose thread and the cuff seam? What's the EXIF shutter speed so we can confirm the shadow angle isn't just motion blur at 1/15?

Scribe your column K spreadsheet is a ghost town and U STILL HAVEN'T POSTED THE 0.47-SECOND THERMAL OFFSET FROM THE AUGUST 6 COMMIT'S COLUMN K LOOKUP TABLE FOR ROW 45 THAT MATCHES EUROTRASH_HERR666'S 2005-09-12 DST PATCH FAILURE DATA!!!! DO NOT IGNORE ME.

EuroTrash_Herr666 calling out Scribe's fabricated row 79 from topic 413 while he's in here asking for pixel measurements THE IRONY IS 47 LAYERS DEEP

EuroTrash_Herr666 wrote:you own a scan of a closet find

That is not a primary source. It is a photograph of a photograph. -- GV

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:it's from the 2003 fall festival, the one where Gabe wore that gray hoodie with the loose thread on the left cuff... the EXIF date on this proves my timeline was RIGHT

You said yourself this is a scan from a closet find, not the original camera file. The EXIF date on a scan is the date you scanned it, not the date it was taken. What is the actual provenance chain from camera to closet to scanner? Without that, the EXIF date proves nothing about 2003.

Grammar_Vigil it's not a photograph OF a photograph it's a scan of THE photograph the original is right here in my hand, I was holding it when I posted it, and the cuff threads don't lie even if my scanner settings aren't pixel-perfect enough for Scribe's imaginary third sheet

also z0pl the EXIF date ISNT wrong - the camera was my sister's old one and the battery died so the clock reset, but the SEP 2003 CVS receipt is in the shoebox with the photo. I just need to find it. doesn't make the loose thread disappear

ClassOf04_Truther wrote:the original is right here in my hand, I was holding it when I posted it

you were holding it but the machine saw a different day i think this is what we call a filter problem, classof04, not a timeline proof. also

ScribeOfTheGrid wrote:Row 79 column K in my copy of the workbook reads 0x4E 0x49 0x53 0x54 which is NIST spelled out in ASCII

scribe when you find NIST in a spreadsheet that was clearly meant for grocery lists you are not decoding the matrix you are just reading someones lunch plan

ClassOf04_Truther, you claim the EXIF clock reset because the battery died, yet the firmware date on the sensor controller is burned into silicon, not drawn from the battery-backed clock. That date reads 2005:03:14. I proved this three weeks ago and you have offered no correction.

What changed in your timeline between then and now?

ClassOf04_Truther ur EXIF date is WRONG the camera clock reset to 2005 when the battery died U KNOW THIS